Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
No child left behind act explained
Controversy of standardized testing
Controversy of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: No child left behind act explained
High-stakes testing has spread a wave of opposition amid society. Fifteen-year old Kiana Hernandez was a student that decided to take matters into her own hands. She proclaimed, “I’m sorry. I’m not going to take the test today,” to her English teacher after finding out that the test was supposed to be used as part of her teacher’s evaluation (Rizga, 38). Nowadays, students are being constantly bombarded with tests that are more harmful than beneficial. Studies imply that state testing programs, “have resulted in increased student anxiety, increased stress, lowered motivation, increased focus on test preparation, and increased job stress and lowered job satisfaction for teachers” (Segool et al., 490). Standardized testing is not an efficient …show more content…
The NCLB was passed by Congress in 2001 and later signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002 (“No Child Left Behind Act.” 1). It regulated public education in elementary and secondary schools and sought to “improve student performance, hold schools accountable for student progress, and provide assistance and options for students in failing schools” (“No Child Left Behind Act.” 1). President Barack Obama’s RTT is a series of competitive grants that have been awarded to states willing to embrace the administration's favored policies to improve public schools (Lyndsey, 3). Lyndsey established, “Race to the Top has been controversial among teachers unions, which have argued that federal tax dollars should be spent equally among school districts instead of creating ‘winners and losers.’” (3). Instead of forming a sense of fairness among schools, Race to the Top has placed labels on schools. Furthermore, the Common Core State Standards are a set of uniform expectations for American students in English language arts and mathematics (“Common Core” 1). The standards – assigned to students in kindergarten through 12th grade – are designed to prepare students for college and the workforce (“Common Core” 1). Many claim that these standards allow the federal state and territorial governments to control school systems (“Common Core” 1). If they hadn’t already, most states had planned to implement Common Core State Standards in the 2014-2015 school years. While these acts were supposed to improve the educational system, they failed to deal with the real matters at
It is 1917. You are a young American man who has enlisted in the armed forces, but before you are shipped off to France, you have to take what is known as an Army Alpha Test. Your scores will be compared to more than a million others and the results will determine whether you are placed in an officer training program or simply thrust onto the battlefield. High stakes were placed on this test 93 years ago; high stakes are placed on tests modeled after them today. The standardized achievement tests commonly used in schools today evolved from the Army Alphas developed by the American Psychological Association. This is precisely the problem. Standardized tests are old and outdated, and the harm they cause to America’s education system by far out-weighs the benefits. These tests were intended to monitor and offer ways to improve how public schools function, but instead they have impaired the natural learning ability of students and imposed upon the judgment of experienced educators. Although a means to evaluate the progress of public schools in necessary, it is also necessary to develop more modern and effective ways of doing so. Standardized testing mandated by the federal and state governments has a negative effect on the education of America’s youth.
Imagine walking into school on day one of the Transitional Colorado Assessment Program, or better known as TCAP. You are rushed to your proctor’s room. This is just day one of the six long grueling test days. The school board is counting on you to score high enough to reflect positively on your school district. Each session will last up to sixty minutes with just enough time for most students to finish. There are usually three sessions per day. For most students, this process is one which is dreaded with each coming year. TCAP results are scored by advanced, proficient, partially proficient, or unsatisfactory (Time4Learning). The TCAP tests students from 3rd through 10th grade. This test happens the same time each year. There are four different tests that constitute the TCAP: reading, writing, math, and for the 5th, 8th, and 10th grades science.
Standardized testing requires students to study for something that is supposed to show how much students have learned over their years of school when they should be devoting their time into class they are currently taking at school. A test that is supposed to display how much a student has learned over their years attending school should not affect what college you go to. A person could be really smart and have all “A’s” every year, but he has test anxiety and scores very low on the standardized test. Therefore, he will not be able to get accepted by the major Universities due to his low scores.
In “Standardized testing undermines teaching,” the author, Diane Ravitch, reviewed a book she authored, The death and life of the great American school system: how testing and choice are undermining education. This review highlights various cons of Standardized testing on the students and educators. She states that standardized testing and the use of incentives to motivate students and educators have failed to meet the set goals. Although the author was at the forefront of advocating for this system, she is now opposed to it and sceptical of the use of incentives to motivate teachers. She also reviews the role of charter schools in perpetuating classism. She states that standard tests and the use of...
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
Standardized testing is a down fall to many students but also an opportunity for many others. Standardized testing has its pros and its cons. It can be the make it or break it factor into getting into colleges you are hoping to attend or the scholarships you want to earn. Some people may have their opinions about the test, whether they hate it or not but the fact is that it’s here to stay.
tests were primarily employed as measures of student achievement that could be reported to parents, and as a means of noting state and district trends (Moon 2) . Teachers paid little attention to these tests, which in turn had little impact on curriculum. However, in the continuing quest for better schools and high achieving students, testing has become a central focus of policy and practice. Standardized tests are tests that attempt to present unbiased material under the same, predetermined conditions and with consistent scoring and interpretation so that students have equal opportunities to give correct answers and receive an accurate assessment. The idea is that these similarities allow the highest degree of certainty in comparing result...
Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.
The NCLB Act is now envisioned to be a solution to this ongoing argument; this act guarantees extra funding for schools in low-income areas and for all American children to receive equal education (“The No Child”, 1). As expected, the government anticipates positive results and feedbacks from all public schools in the nation, before actually giving those schools more money as a reward. In this case, the government expects every school in this country to regulate a new standardized test for students (Popham, 14). This new standardized test will be used by the government to rate schools, whether the school is ‘failing’ or not, based on their students’ performances on this test.
A. In recent years, the State of Tennessee has changed standardized testing, in many ways that are not benefical to students or teachers.
One of the biggest topics in the educational world is standardized tests. All fifty states have their own standards following the common core curriculum. There are many positives and negatives that go with the standardized tests. A standardized test is any type of “examination that's administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner” (Popham, 1999). These standardized tests are either aptitude tests or achievement tests. Schools use achievement tests to compare students.
The impact I have seen is not a positive one and there is a sumptuous amount of supporting evidence that suggests these test do more harm than good. The affects of these tests stretch to every member of a community whether they realize it or not. These tests put pressure on students to do their best, make teachers teach to the test instead of what is best fitted for their individual students, affect local real estate based on the scores the surrounding schools receive, which in turn affects the opportunity of low-income families, are not accommodating to those with disabilities or ones that are not proficient in English (Spring, J., 2000). The list goes on and on about the wide range of influence these tests have, and not in a good way. This is why this subject is very serious to me for I believe these tests will eventually change school as we know it, eliminating any creative thinking or individuality in student’s work. This paper will discuss in-depth the affects of high-stakes testing on local communities versus what they are intended to be used
Standardized test are tests given to all test-takers under the same conditions. They are perceived to be a more fair form of judgment to students applying for a higher level of education rather than assessment that use different questions or different conditions of students according to their socioeconomic status, race among other considerations. They are designed in such a way that the questions, scoring procedures, interpretations and their conditions for administering are administered in the best manner they could provide.
The author addresses paper and pencil tests with no special accommodations, and analyses trends throughout past decades. He also writes of the new era of standardized testing and accountability. Stiggins suggests that while standardized testing may be useful and effective in some aspects, most are not used correctly and that the high-stakes put intense pressure on teachers, making it difficult to actually complete their job which is to teach students new skills. They simply spend their time reviewing already learned skills to ensure good scores on exams.
Standardized testing is a simple definition is an assessment. The definition of assessment is a grouped examination of skills and talents about students. When society say the tests will be standardized, this means the certain group and type of students will all take the same test and be counted and investigated the same way. According to Joe when the test scores come in they are compared to students in their school and also schools worldwide to see how they did and compared to other students with the same grade. The standardized test requires everyone taking the test to answer the same question or something very similar to it, so it is fair. Every student is scored in a reliable way then it makes it possible to compare how students do.