The Negative Disadvantages Of Designer Babies

1078 Words3 Pages

Life is full of haves and have-nots, that is, people who are wealthy and the people who are very poor, described in the Collins English Dictionary (Haves). In society, it is not difficult to recognize the contrast between them. The middle class group blends in between, and as long as there has been humanity, there have been different levels of social classes. With the potential to choose different options for a child’s genes, those that have the financial means would be able to guarantee that their progeny would be bigger, better, smarter, and better-looking to get ahead faster and have the ultimate success. The gap between the very rich and very poor would become even greater as natural genetics would remain in the lower middle and poor
For example, if society will be altered in a negative way, will there be a way to repair it? Once the genetics are modified, will they continue through future generations? In Sarah Knapton’s Telegraph article, opponents to genetic manipulation argue that changes will continue in future generations because the transformations are happening in embryos, as opposed to genetic testing that is completed in the womb (Knapton). If that is true, then the unfair advantages of designer babies would continue to perpetuate through time, and societal gaps would continue to increase. With the manipulation of genes, there could be results that may be not seen for years. Imagine the science fiction movies with time travel, where one event that is changed affects another, which then affects another, and another, and so on, until the past is no longer the same past. In gene manipulation, it could result in the opposite effect, where future people or events don’t happen because of the genetic change that happens now. It may sound ridiculous and far-fetched but the technology could eventually happen at that level. To reconsider the original question, will genetically engineered children have an unfair advantage in society, requires a bigger picture outlook. It is possible that they could have an unfair slant over future children, who may not get the chance to

Open Document