The National Park Service (NPS)

958 Words2 Pages

The National Park Service (NPS) is an organization that manages all of the national parks in the United States.
Currently, the US federal government has proposed legislation that would result in significant budget cuts to the NPS. To many people, the NPS is a very essential element to the United States government. Others disagree, saying that the NPS is not as important as some make it out to be. What they don’t know is that the national monuments in the United States tell America’s story. This makes it hard to put an official “price tag” on national monuments. If the federal government cuts funding to the NPS, many precious national parks, such as Yellowstone National Park and Grand Canyon would be ripped of their beauty and turned into wastelands. …show more content…

Many programs that the NPS runs are associated with teaching. Kids are able to get a better understanding of nature and how it works. Bilmes and Loomis state, “the public cares a lot about programs that the National Park Service runs, such as teaching kids about nature, developing teacher curriculum materials, and interpreting historical events.” Because of the NPS, many people are getting to learn more about national parks and how they originated. If the US federal government cuts funding to the NPS, they would be tearing people apart from the education they desire. The federal government would be depriving kids of their right to learn about nature and its history. If the United States’ government were to keep funding the NPS, more people would learn about nature and become more educated. Many people would learn from national monuments because most of the national monuments run by NPS contain “historic or scientific interest” (Steinmetz 32). Because many of these monuments contain historical or scientific artifacts, many people can take something educational away from them. When the federal government cuts the funding of the NPA, they are cutting down the opportunities for education. Without funding, most, if not all, of the historical and scientific monuments will no longer be around, and people will not get to learn from them. …show more content…

They argue that only national parks provide environmental protection. Although this may be true, there would not be any national parks if it weren't for the NPA. The NPA runs all of the nation’s national parks, so if the federal government doesn’t provide funding to them, then the environmental protection provided by national parks will soon fade away. If there is not any funding to the NPA, there is no funding for national parks. Others may also add that there are other ways to learn about nature than from national parks. Even though this is possible, learning from primary examples is very helpful to become better educated. Many people will get to see how landforms were made and get to experience it in person. For people to receive the best learning experience possible, it must be a priority for the federal government to fund the NPA. With that being said, the NPA provides an exceptional outlook on where America should head. If the government wants to head in the right direction with better educational opportunities and better environmental protection, then investing in the NPA is a must. America’s future relies heavily on the National Park

Open Document