The Myth of Prometheus in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

2900 Words6 Pages

Knowledge is a distinctively human virtue. After all, if not for the want of human

beings to learn of and master our habitat, would we not still be counted among the

beasts? For all of the good that knowledge brings to us, however, knowledge can just

as easily bring pain. We discover new types of medicine to extend our lives, but that is

balanced by our awareness of our mortality. We find new advances in technology with

which to bring convenience into our lives, but those advances are countered by the

resulting pollutions that are poisoning our world. These conflicting aspects of

knowledge and its consequences were first discussed thousands of years ago by the

ancient Greeks. The Titan Prometheus bestowed upon mankind the gift of knowledge,

but that gift came with a price. In Frankenstein: or, A Modern Prometheus, Mary

Shelley brings the ideas of Prometheus into the early 19th century by co-opting three of

the central themes of the Prometheus myth—the themes of knowledge with

consequence, the underlying sexism within the story of Pandora, and the use of

lightning as a means of representing knowledge.

A brief discussion of the myth of Prometheus is warranted. There are two major

myths involving Prometheus—those of Prometheus pyrophorus, who brings fire from

the lightning bolt of Zeus to benefit mankind, and that of Prometheus plasticator, who

creates man out of clay. These two major themes involving Prometheus at first seem

disparate but upon close examination fit together quite well. Prometheus is both the

creator and benefactor of man. Eventually, “[b]y about the second or third century A.D.,

the two elements where fused together, so that the fire stolen by Prometheus was also

the...

... middle of paper ...

...ic

Integrity. 8.3 (2006): 257-270. Academic Search Premire. Web. 17 Nov. 2008.

Shelley, Mary . Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. Mary Shelley: Frankenstein.

Ed. Johanna M. Smith. 2nd ed. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism.

Boston: Bedford-St. Martin’s P, 2000. 19-189. Print.

Shattuck, Roger. Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography. New York:

St. Martin’s P, 1996. Print.

Smith, C.U.M. “A Strand of Vermicelli: Dr. Darwin’s Part in the Creation of

Frankenstein’s Monster.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 32.1 (2007): 45-53.

Academic Search Premire. Web. 17 Nov. 2008.

Smith, Johanna M. “’Cooped Up’ with ‘Sad Trash’: Domesticity and the Sciences in

Frankenstein.” Mary Shelley: Frankenstein. Ed. Johanna M. Smith. 2nd ed.

Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin’s P, 2000.

313-333. Print.

Open Document