More handpicked essays just for you.
Multitasking can make you lose focus byplina tugend
Multitasking can make you lose focus byplina tugend
Christine Rosen summary on the myth of multitasking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “The Myth of Multitasking”, Christine Rosen argues that multitasking has become the normal way of doing things for many people and there are many side effects from multitasking. Many people believe that multitasking is a skill, but multitasking is in fact just dangerous. Multitasking has changed today’s society because more people are texting and driving, distracted for longer periods of time, cannot retrieve information, and attention spans are weaker. If more people took their time and paid attention to how they complete a task the first time then things could get done quicker instead of trying to do too many things at one time. In conclusion, multitasking is based on how much a person pays attention while doing a task and in today’s society is it harder for people to pay attention for long periods of time. …show more content…
Certainly, today’s society has gotten out of hand with the way that tasks are done and how long it takes to do them.
I personally believe that Rosen’s article does have many great points in them because of the research she has put in and the great statistics that are provided. One point that I found interesting was that multitasking is bad for your health and can cause you to have short term memory loss if you do it constantly. I also like the fact that the article is broken up into three different parts so that you can get real life examples, effects on the brain, and why paying attention is important. It makes the article easier to understand it and it actually taught me a few things that I didn’t know about multitasking so that was also great. Altogether, this article has its great points and evidence, but I would like to know a little more background about
multitasking. My opinion of the article is mostly good thoughts because I liked how Rosen added the points from 1740 to 2007. The opinions have definitely changed over time and the more people that researched the topic finds new information every day and it adds to the article in a major way. I would also like to add that I wanted to know more information about how multitasking affects the whole body not just the brain. Although, the brain research is conducted very well and has great facts about what multitasking does to your brain. The paying attention piece in the article is my favorite because I never knew that there are many differences with attention. In addition, I do agree that new technology coming out people will depend on it more. One thing that I disliked about the article was with multitasking and the economy. I feel as though the economy would lose production whether people had interruptions or not because disasters and other accidents happen and sometimes things cannot get done at the time that is wanted by the employer. Additionally, I did not like Rosen blaming technology for multitasking because I feel like multitasking has been around longer than advanced technology has been out. For the most part, the article was good and even with the dislikes that I pointed out it still flowed very well and was very interesting to read. I do have a few questions left for the author and was wondering if she would have added it to her article. For example, what is the main cause of people to start multitasking? She talked about how texting and driving, watching television, checking e-mails, and listening to music were distractions, but I would like to know the real reason with research on why people think that doing something faster will help them in the long run. My second question is would you consider yourself as a multitasker? Rosen uses doctors, professors, and many others for her article, but I feel like it would have added more to the article if she provided details on whether or not she multitasks herself. My final question is if you could use research from dates later than used in your article, would you?
As human beings, it is becoming more of a second nature to us to multi-task. As the world is technologically advancing more and more every day, there are becoming more distractions. Social-media is flourishing, reality TV show ratings are going up, and humans even unintentionally check their phones every two minutes. In this day of age, multi-tasking is proving to promote inefficiency rather than productivity.
In the article, “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend centralizes around the negative effects of multitasking. She shows that often with multitasking, people tend to lose focus, lack work quality, have an increase in stress, and in the end she gives a solution to all these problems. Tugend conveys her points by using understandable language, a clear division of subjects, and many reliable sources, making her article cogent.
Students may easily lose their attention and concentration with easy access to such incredibly rich store of information. With such new technologies as television, internet and social networks, people nowadays tend to multitask more often as they have easy access to a large amount of information. However, such easy access may sometimes be a distraction. Study “Your Brain on Computers” reports that heavy multitaskers perform up to 20% worse on most tests compared to performance of light multitaskers. Working efficiency of people, who multitask, is claimed to be significantly lower. The same is with concentration. (Crovitz 353) As a result, they are not engaged in working process. Students tend to be easily distr...
In the chapter “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” from The New Brain, written by Richard Restak, Restak makes some very good points on his view of multitasking and modern technology. He argues that multitasking is very inefficient and that our modern technology is making our minds weaker. Multitasking and modern technology is causing people to care too much what other people think of them, to not be able to focus on one topic, and to not be able to think for themselves.
In the article,“Multitasking is actually kind of a problem for kids and adults” by Hayley Tsukayama the author went into detail about how parents and their children view their personal media habits. One of the ways that the parents and children viewed their media habits as was feeling the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately. “More than 1,200 parents and teens surveyed, 48 percent of parents and 72 percent of teens said they felt the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately, almost guaranteeing distractions throughout the day” (Tsukayama). This article can be connected to “The Epidemic of Media Multitasking While Learning” both of the articles discussed the different factors of media multitasking among individuals. The article from The Washington Post website gave great insight on multitasking and rather it is bad for students when it comes to learning. I believe that the issue being discussed is very relevant because if students are easily distracted by technology while in their learning environment it results in them not learning
On May 3, 2013, The New York Times had posted an article discussing the poor effects that can happen to the brain if you are multitasking and being interrupted. There have been claims from numerous Universities suggesting that multitasking can deaden our brain. Sullivan and Thompson give us the insinuated results that if one wishes to accomplish two or more tasks at once, they will not reach the maximum capacity of success that the brain offers to them. Research on this topic has been minimal so the authors decide to investigate more on this epidemic (Sullivan and Thompson).
Multitasking requires that a worker divides his/her time and energy on multiple tasks at the same time. As a result, the care and attention to detail is divided. The amount of focus that could be used to review one assignment is split. In an experiment, Patterson (2017) discovered that students who studied while participating in media multitasking took longer to complete tasks in their classes. This experiment addresses media multitasking in the case of students. While it is not a type of multitasking we normally consider, it does involve performing multiple tasks at one. Instead of putting all of their focus on their assignments, these students’ attention is on the assignment and on their social media. The results of the experiment prove that it when placed in scenarios where people are required to focus on multiple things, it takes more time to complete certain tasks. In this instance, media multitasking caused a decrease in performance. In another experiment, Paridon and Kaufmann (2010) made an observation when studying multitasking in the workplace, stating that people’s reaction time diminished when multiple tasks were completed at once. The believe that multitasking affects people’s performance has also been proven to be true in the workplace, as the speed of people’s production when down when required to complete multiple tasks. Performance can be determined by the speed in which a task is completed.
Rosen stated that “how do we teach focus in a world that is constantly drawing our attention elsewhere? One strategy that we are using in classrooms around the world is called “technology break.” He explained that this strategy work by teachers leading students check their social media, messages, emails, or text only for a minute after that they have to turn their phones silent and facing down ,and work for fifteen minutes after the 15 minutes had pass they repeat the process again. I guess this strategy is all about controlling anxiety which is what really cause the used of technology. I really don’t believe we can teach people to focus in more important things than elsewhere because this is all about using and adjusting to technology the right way. If people were to have more activities outside their home and school, there would be a very huge number of people using less and less technology this
In conclusion, multitasking has effects on the users’ abilities to retain their concentration, and also short-term memory overcomes long-term memory due to using the Net. Carr’s thesis is interesting and I agree with him. It is important to remember that excessive use of the Internet might cause permanent changes to the way our brains act; therefore, we, as users, have to pay more attention to the new digital age of media
Students, who have been chosen by their perceived ability to multitask, are asked to “identify whether numbers are odd or even, letters as vowels or consonants” while dealing with constant distractions (qtd. in Digital Nation). Furthermore, Nass shows that while people may believe they can multitask, it is simply not possible. After Dretzin and Rushkoff discuss technology in their own lives, they meet with the only neuroscientist to examine the effects of the Internet on the brain.
Technology has always been improving over the decades, and now it has improved to the point where it’s a part of a human being’s life. People can’t imagine living without technology anymore nowadays, and especially college students who are always on their phones and laptops during lectures. That leads to what is known as multitasking, which is the ability to take care of more than one task at the same time. Multitasking has been popularized by students, and specifically college students, who think that they are actually successful at doing it. Unfortunately, according to Digital Nation: Life on the Virtual Frontier, after testing students who think they are brilliant at multitasking, results showed that they are terrible at every aspect of multitasking; consequently, it is not successful.
A lot of people believe they can multitask but in reality they can´t. Multi-tasking actually hurts your brain. Our brains were made for focusing on one thing and one thing only and when you multi-task it is actually slowing your brain down. When people think the are multi-tasking they are actually going from one thing to another very quickly. When doing this, this causes really bad brain habits. Another thing that multitasking does is that it makes it more harder to focus and throw out all the information you do not need in your brain. A study was done at the University of London and it showed that people who were multi-tasking had an IQ of a person who skipped a night of sleep or a person who smokes marijuana. Multi-tasking has also shown
As Carr explained in Wired, "While our long-term memory has a nearly unlimited capacity, the short-term memory has more limited storage, and that storage is very fragile. A break of attention can sweep its content from our mind" (qtd.in Gregoire, "How Technology Is Warping Your Memory"). With every technological advance, the content that takes up our attention keeps increasing. No one in the modern days seems to be able to leave their phones, and always having the urge to check it every 15 minutes, either for text message, e-mails, or simply how many "likes" they have gotten from a Facebook's post. Multi-tasking is not something to be considered briliant anymore, since anyone that can operate a computer can do it.
In today’s society, technology use has increased rapidly, and the need for multitasking correlates with that. Multitasking is the ability to perform well at two or more jobs at the same time (Van der Horst et al. 434). Technology is ever growing, and the ability to multitask has become more apparent. The need to understand multitasking has only recently become a topic of importance (Van der Horst et al. 434). Van der Horst mentions that with the quantity of technologies people have access to like email, instant messaging, and smart phones, people deal with multiple sources of information at once all the time (Van der Horst et al. 434). On average, people spend three minutes on a task and when technology is involved, only two
Literature shows that the networking generation is very involved in multitasking, but they are still showing no signs of improving. Students bring media multitasking into the classroom with them on a regular basis; this has negative implications on learning. Threaded cognition and cognitive load theory attempt to explain multitasking. Using these studies, past literature has been examining how multitasking impacts the human ability to retain information; thus negatively effecting learning.