The Myth Of I M Bad At Math Summary

499 Words1 Page

The article “The Myth of ‘I’m Bad at Math’” was written by Noah Smith and Miles

Kimball in 2013 and was published on The Atlantic’s website on the 23rd of October. In their

article Miles Kimball and Noah Smith have offered the idea that being “Bad at Math” was a

myth. They claim that “in high-school math, inborn talent is much less important than hard

work, preparation, and self-confidence.” Both of them have been teaching math for years, and

realized that “the unprepared kids, not realizing that the top scorers were well-prepared, assume

that genetic ability was what determined the performance differences. Deciding that they just

aren’t math people, they don’t try hard in future classes, and fall further behind.” In their article …show more content…

“Convincing students that they could make themselves smarter by hard work led them

to work harder and get higher grades”, in other words, Smith and Kimball believe that the

muscle that our brain is can be trained to do what we want it to do, which means learning

math.


Response :

I believe that math ability is changeable, a point that needs emphasizing since a lot of

people (especially middle and high schoolers) believe that once they failed one or two math

classes there is no way that they are able to “do math”. The brain is still developing and will

keep doing it until the person reaches 25 or so. Adolescents still looking for a place to fit

themselves in society -in life, in school- get discouraged easily and end up giving up on the

subject and not even try to improve anymore.


N&M surely are right about hard work, preparation and self confidence being a key to

“math success”, these are the key to mostly anything, (“don’t only work for it, work hard”) but

they might also be aware that according to some studies, if the subject isn’t taught right and

explained properly, those three “keys” aren’t built on good bases. Bases are the

Open Document