Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The implications of science on humanity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The implications of science on humanity
McCallon, Jacob
History 201
19 September 2016
Response Paper 1 The way we study world history is influenced by the way we perceive the world. That is the point that Jared Diamond, Martin Lewis and Karen Wigen try to make in their excerpts. The direction that the two articles, “Yali’s Question” and the Introduction of ”The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography,” differ widely. Jared Diamond’s article argues that the hunter gatherer tribes of New Guinea are viewed as inferior due to their lack of technological and infrastructural advancement. The problem is that our view of other societies is skewed by our perception of the way the world is. Similarly, Lewis’ and Wigen’s article focuses on the inequality of world perception by analyzing
…show more content…
We create these perceptions based on the knowledge we have established for ourselves to be true. They go on to say that our view of the world is influenced by European ideals and that conceptions of geography are overly biased (Lewis and Wigen p 10). If we can stop viewing the geography of the world in a way that elevates European society and degrades less acknowledged societies, we will then be able to clearly participate in the academic discussion of what is world history. I think that this is interesting as they use maps as a way to prove that society has biased opinions of how the world is. The whole idea of continents is an idea that allows for the generalization of world perception. Lewis and Wigen say that “continents are much more than the gross elements of global cartography” but they “also [guide] our basic conceptions of the natural world” (p. 2). Continents are used as scapegoats to generalize our understandings and feed our stereotypes. This argument is quite unique in that geography is used to show the ineptness of human perceptions in and pertaining to the world as it is. We all have ideas on what the world is and we all allow that to get in the way of true learning. When I think of Africa, I think of harsh climates, lions and zebras. That is unfair because there are so many different diverse climates that make up the African continent and the animals we see at the zoo only live in certain parts of it. That is just an example of what Lewis and Wigen are talking about. When I received a mission call to Russia, I had all of these notions of soviet union era espionage films and preconceived ideals. When I got there, I was shocked to learn that not every part of Russia is like the Europeanized cities of St. Petersburg or Moscow. The region I was serving in was more like China or Korea. The Sea of Japan bordered the region where I served
The reason Jared Diamond wrote this book was to answer the question of his political friend Yali, why did some societies like Eurasia were able to develop Guns, Germs, and Steel that were able to dominate major parts of the world, and why New Guinea was not capable of doing this? This question is certainly not a small picture kind of question because it covers a broad realm. Diamond is a book that has tried his best to cover a whole pattern of history, starting from before the Ice Age to the modern period. But Diamond's all-time famous and award-winning book was really successful in explaining the broad question. Such a type of question is critical to gain a stronger understanding of Diamond’s argument and its effect on the field of history.
Elisabeth Gaynor, Ellis, and Anthony Esler. "The First Global Age: Europe, the Americas and Africa ." In World history connections to today. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003.
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
In his short article “World History as a Way of Thinking” Eric Lane Martin, “…argue[s] that the most important things the field of world history has to offer the researcher, teacher, student, and general public are the conceptual tools required for understanding complex global processes and problems.” Anyone who follows the evening news or shops at Wal-mart, has encountered the processes and problems Martin speaks of. Our modern society puts pressure on a variety of citizens to grapple with and attempt to understand issues on a scale that moves beyond the local and national. History has long been a tool utilized by scholars, politicians and citizens to help them put current day happenings into context. That context has allowed for a deeper understanding of the present day. In an era when the issues cross national and regional boundaries the need for a different scale of history has become apparent. World history has emerged as a relatively new discipline within academia that is attempting to provide the context for large-scale processes and problems. As the field has grown a variety of authors, some historians, some from other fields, have attempted to write a history of the world. With such a daunting task how can we define success? How can we analyze the history that provides a true global perspective on processes and problems we face? By taking Martin’s two key characteristics of world history, one, it is defined by the kinds of questions it asks and two, it is defined by the problem-solving techniques it uses, we can analyze texts purporting to be world history and access their utility in providing context for the global processes and problems we face today.
Upshur, Jiu-Hwa, Janice J. Terry, Jim Holoka, Richard D. Goff, and George H. Cassar. Thomson advantage Books World History. Compact 4th edition ed. Vol. Comprehensive volume. Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth, 2005. 107-109. Print.
Flory, Harriette, and Samuel Jenike. A World History: The Modern World. Volume 2. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1992. 42.
Bulliet, Richard W. Earth and Its Peoples: a Global History. 5th ed. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.
...is, Elisabeth Gaynor., and Anthony Esler. World History Connections to Today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999. Print.
Beck, Roger B., Linda Black, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C. Naylor, and Dahia I. Shabaka. World History: Patterns of Interaction. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell, 2009.
Schroeder, Michael. “Major Themes in World History.” Encyclopedia of World History. Modern World History Online. Web. 20 Mar. 2012. .
Ellis, Elizabeth Gaynor, and Anthony Esler. World History: The Modern Era. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
He argues that world history should not be viewed as separate, unconnected cultures of east and west, but rather that they were all connected in multitudes of ways and must be studied as such. Pointing out the inadequate ideal of separating the world into two sections which are not equal in geography, culture, population, or history itself, he instead poses a solution to the world history viewpoint: Studying the world through its interrelations between cultures and geographical locations. Hodgson’s proposed view of large scale history not only makes sense theoretically, but logically as it proves through the pages that the history or the world cannot simply be divided, but must be studied as a whole to be truly
The patterns of living that the world witnesses today are greatly influenced by history. This is because of the fact that history plays an immense role in forming one’s future; the abundant interactions socially, economically, politically, result in repercussions that can hardly be unraveled. However, this does not in anyway mean that one cannot trace today’s state of affairs back to its roots. Tracing today’s occurrences back to their origin is possible due to the fact that the agents’ (nations) origins are known.
The first examples are used to support the lack of progression of society. The “civilized” man of the Americas and Europe is compared to the “savages” of New Zealand.
Duiker, William J. , and Jackson J. Spielvogel. World History . 6th. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Pub Co, 2010. print.