The Mozart Effect: Does Music Make You Smarter?

1335 Words3 Pages

Numerous amounts of successful individuals throughout history have had music as a special part in their lives. Many of these people started playing instruments as a child. For example, Abraham Lincoln played the violin, Richard Nixon was a classically trained pianist, and many more presidents have had musical training in their lives. President Bill Clinton once said, “I don’t think I would have become President if it were not for my school music program.” Even music might have not been their career choice, the lessons that were taught to them has helped their over all growth and maturity. Music lessons involve high energetic focus for long periods of time, technical skills, expression of emotions, and much more. A well known reason why parents …show more content…

There has been a common phrase known as “music makes you smarter” which has become one of the most widely known interpretations of psychological findings. This form of the Mozart effect is more difficult to prove. Even though the Mozart effect has been recreated through physically playing instruments, failures to recreate the effect raised doubts about it’s reliability (eg., Steele, Bass, & Crook, 1999; Steele, Dalla Bella, et al., 1999.) The point at issue with these proven effects, is that it is difficult to tell whether the effect is based on the music, or if it is based on just “enjoyment arousal” and/or positive moods induced by the music. The reason why this is such a unique hypothesis is because if an individual does not like Mozart and the classical music genre over all, listening to the music might not help the individual’s performance in non musical studies at all. “Moreover, negative moods and boredom can produce deficits in performance and learning (Koester & Farley, 1982; Kovacs & Beck, 1977; O’Hanlon, 1981), whereas positive moods can lead to improved performance on various cognitive and problem-solving tasks (Ashby, Isen, & Turken, 1999; Isen, 1999).” (Thompson, Schellenberg, & Husain, 2001: p 248). This shows that if the Mozart effect is an account for arousal or mood, then similar increases in performance on spatial tasks should also be observed other than music. “Rauscher and Shaw conjectured that the other investigators have had difficulties in producing a Mozart effect because the investigators have not distinguished between spatial-temporal tasks and spatial pattern-recognition tasks.” Steele, Bass, Crook, 1999: p 368). As a result, more research is needed in order to prove the Mozart

Open Document