The Most Dangerous Game Irony Analysis

625 Words2 Pages

“The Most Dangerous Game” is an adventure story, written by Richard Connell. Rainsford, the protagonist of the book, is caught in an ironic situation throughout the story. Richard uses irony in this story to give it dramatic emphasis. Irony is when the reader expects one thing, but in reality, it is not what it seems to be. There are two main types of irony in this story, which causes the reader to pause and revaluate what he has read.
Situational irony is the first type of irony in “The Most Dangerous Game”. In the story, Rainsford finds himself on a mysterious island where he does not know anyone, and he thinks no one knows him as well. Rainsford knew, however, that he was not alone on the island because he heard gunshots the night before followed by, “a high screaming sound, the sound of an animal” (10) before he made it to the island. Rainsford realizes then that he will not be alone on this island. Later that day, Rainsford met General Zaroff. General Zaroff addresses him, “[i]t is a very great …show more content…

“The Most Dangerous Game” gives a reader a sense that there is a fun game being played, that might be dangerous to the people who play it. In the story, it turns out that the game is not a fun game, but it turns out to be a game between life and death. General Zaroff tells Rainsford, “[y]ou’ll find this game worth playing…the stake is not without value” (18). By saying this, the value that is at stake is the life of the individual that it involves. Anything that involves risking a life is not a game to most people, which makes it ironic how Zaroff calls it simply a game. Also, the word game is used to describe the size of an animal that is being hunted. Richard Connell titles the game in this story as “The Most Dangerous” (8). Richard uses verbal irony when he writes this title. If someone is hunting the most dangerous game, then that hunter’s life is in the most danger when he hunts that

Open Document