The Morality Of Life In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World

1284 Words3 Pages

The “Brave New World” is a dystrophic type of novel written by Aldous Huxley in 1931. The world described by Huxley is marginal, extraordinary and almost the exact opposite of our today’s world. It’s an ongoing life that is between the ideal and scary. It’s ideal because there is no sickness, poverty, or war in the brave new world. Everyone is happy and almost perfectly healthy. But on the other hand, it’s scary because in order to reach this ideal world described above, individuals have to sacrifice a lot of values that are significant and meaningful for them; such as family (motherhood, fatherhood etc), philosophy, culture, literature, religion, and freedom. So in a way, Huxley fictionalizes an “ironic utopian” world.
In the “Brave New World”, everyone fulfills his or her responsibilities, In fact; they don’t have any right not to fulfill their duties nor they don’t even think about questioning their responsibilities. If there is a case that they don’t make a choice, there are other people who make that decision for that person. The underlying reason for this is because they believe in the value of society over the individual. Social utility is strictly protected. The conscious collective awareness is emphasized; meanwhile the individual gratifications are forced to suppress. In short, “everybody is for everybody”.
In the fiction of Huxley, the classical conditioning is one of the major concepts. In this science-fiction novel, Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre is the place where humans’ serial production and education is given. Through Pavlovian conditioning, the social class and duties of these people are predetermined. They are perfectly healthy and immunized to all kinds of sickness, even to aging. (i.e.: peop...

... middle of paper ...

... teaching (!) method while sleeping is freighting.
Being exposed to the same rituals by government would create a society of individual that are exactly the same with each other. If that was the case, everyone would be the same and thus there would be no diversity and uniqueness. We would even have no identity of our own. This is also a perfect example of how classical conditioning or science in general can be used in a bad manipulative and abusive way.
No one could call it a life if there is no chaos, unknowns and misery; because thing that we call life is the sum of all of these unknowns, question marks in our heads and our happy or sad times. So, I agree with John the savage “But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness, I want sin. I claim them all. I'm claiming the right to be unhappy.”

Open Document