The Moonstone By Wilkie Collins: Character Analysis

1124 Words3 Pages

People often act impulsively based on what they believe in, despite the consequences. For literary characters, their impulsiveness creates conflicting sides to their personalities which could help develop their character or undermine their roles in their novels. In the novel, The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins, the characters, Rachel Verinder and Godfrey Ablewhite, contain two different sides to their personality which develop their roles in the novel.
Rachel Verinder’s hostility toward the investigation and indifference toward those who are helping her, help her role in the novel as one of the major suspects in the mystery of the missing Moonstone. After news of the Moonstone’s disappearance spreads, Rachel immediately locks herself in her room …show more content…

After finding out that everyone believes Godfrey has pawned the Moonstone, Rachel becomes frantic and declares that “This is [her] fault [… and she] must set it right” (96). She then says that she knows “the hand that took the Moonstone”, but does not reveal his name (97). Her determination to clear Godfrey’s name reveals that she cares about others and is not mean as she appears earlier in the novel. It also adds to the mystery of the novel since Rachel claims that she knows who has stolen the Moonstone. This revelation does not help her as a suspect as it appears that she has stolen her own diamond. However, Rachel’s caring side clears her as the criminal when Franklin goes to confront her at Mr. Bruff’s house. She reveals that Franklin has stolen the Moonstone; however, she has “kept [his] infamy a secret” (158). After Franklin asks her why she did not confess, Rachel explains that she could not tell the truth about him and the Moonstone because “there was some infatuation in [her] mind which [would not] let [her] give [him] up” (163). Because of her love for Franklin, Rachel refuses to expose the truth about what happened to the Moonstone. As a result, it causes much confusion during the investigation. It also explains why she acts so hostile toward everyone during the investigation; she is angry at Franklin for not confessing but also wants to protect him. Rachel’s …show more content…

Betteredge describes him as “a barrister by profession; a ladies’ man by temperament; and a good Samaritan by choice” (25). This helps him become popular in the community along with the fact that he is a part of several charities such as the Ladies’ Charity. Betteredge claims that “[Godfrey] love[s] everybody […and] everybody love[s] HIM” (25). Because of his charm, likability, and popularity, it is hard to believe that he could take the Moonstone. After the Moonstone goes missing, Godfrey willingly cooperates with the investigation, giving no suspicion. When Sergeant Cuff asks to search all of the wardrobes in the house, Godfrey hands over his keys without any hesitation. There is very little evidence against Godfrey as the criminal other than the fact that he is in the house on the night of the crime. His likability and good nature essentially remove all suspicion from him which helps him get away with the crime for so long. Godfrey’s charismatic nature and his popularity help his role as the culprit as it prevents anyone from suspecting

Open Document