Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research about managerial role
Classical theory of management
Analysis of functions of management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research about managerial role
This essay explores the work of a modern manager and further analyses it to understand its relevance with Fayol’s managerial functions. The significance of the economic and technological conditions in the organisation’s general environment upon his work is also subsequently discussed. On top of that, a comprehensive evaluation and comparison between various school of thoughts on the discussed topics will also be presented, fully supported with evidence.A manager is defined as someone who coordinates and overlooks the work of other people so that organisational goals can be accomplished (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, and Coulter ,2012). Due to the consistently evolving nature of the economy, a clear guideline for a manager’s work ceases to exist. Each manager performs different tasks according to their work. Nevertheless, modern management practice generally revolves around the paradigm of Henry Fayol’s key managerial functions of planning, organizing, leading and controlling despite experiencing various trajectories throughout the years. This notion is supported by Carroll and Gillen (1987), who affirmed that classical functions still represent the most useful way of conceptualizing the manager’s job.
Mr. A, who was the manager interviewed, is a top level manager . He currently holds the position of Managing Director in Company ABC, which is a medium-sized organisation in the fasteners retail industry. Company ABC is a well-known supplier of fasteners and hardware to automotive, construction and manufacturing industries. According to Robbins., et al.(2012), top managers are responsible for making organisation-wide decisions and establishing various goals and plans that affect the whole organisation. Indeed ,as the Managing...
... middle of paper ...
...ez-Mejia, J.E. McCann & R.C. Page. The Structure of managerial behaviours and rewards, Industrial Relations. Vol. 24, No. 1, 1985,147-154.doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1985.tb00986.x
Peterson, O. T., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2004). The ongoing legacy of R.L. Katz: An updated typology of management skills, Management Decision, 42(10), 1297 – 1308. doi: 10.1108/00251740410568980
Robbins, S., Bergman, R., Stagg, I., & Coulter, M. (2012). Management (6th ed.). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Australia.
T.A. Mahoney,T.H. Jerdee and S.J. Carroll.(1965) The job(s) of management.Industrial Relations, Vol. 4, No. 2,1965, 97-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1965.tb00922.x
Tengblad, S.(2006). Is there a 'New Managerial Work'? A Comparison with Henry Mintzberg's Classic Study 30 Years Later. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1437-1461. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00651.x
Through personal experience, Fayol distinguished what he thought to be the prime functions of being a manager. It is said that he was the first to illustrate the need for the education of management (Brodie, 1967, in Fells, 2000) and in relation to management; Fayol’s perspective was what managers should do. Through categorising business activities into six activities, technical; commercial; financial; security; accounting and management; Fayol’s work focused on the latter category, management (Fells, 2000, pg.345).
Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2009). Management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.
Over 50 years ago, English-speaking managers were directly introduced to Henry Fayol’s theory in management. His treatise, General and Industrial Management (1949), has had a great effect on managers and the practice of management around the world. However, 24 years after the English translation of Fayol, Henri Mintzberg in the Nature of Managerial Work (1973) developed another theory and stated that Fayol’s work was just “folklores”.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2011). Contemporary management. (7 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Bartol, K., Tein, M., Matthews, G., Sharma, B. (2008), Management: a pacific-rim focus, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, Australia
Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2011).Management: Leading and collaborating in a competitive world (9thed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
It is disputable that management is a vital part for businesses to be successful. A sensible manager can lead his firm to operate in a proper way. Nonetheless, the field of management has not really solved the fundamental question for around half a century, ‘What does a manager actually do?’ In order to administer a company, Fayol (1949) holds the view that management should interact with subordinates in five basic elements. They are planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Although these five words have dominated management vocabulary after Fayol presented them, there are still many people argue his perspective over this century. In this essay, I will discuss Fayol’s viewpoint critically through an analysis of his and others sight on management, outline the rationale behind Fayol’s argument and demonstrate further perspective on management.
Robbins, S.P., DeCenzo, D.A., & Coulter, M. (2013). Fundamentals of management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gosling, J. and H. Mintzberg (2003). "The Five Minds of a Manager." Harvard Business Review (November 2003): 1-10.
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
The aim of this essay is to discuss nature of managerial work. In this paper I will compare commonly accepted views about managerial work from a literature and discuss different views on this topic. A manager can be defined as someone whose role in an organisation involves planning, organising, coordinating, commanding and controlling. Management is the act of carrying out the five roles stated above and has been there since the world was formed. From the biblical point of view when God formed the earth he put man in charge of the earth and everything in it. Today managers are seen everywhere i.e., at home where the father is manager of family security and mother manager of family nourishment and in the community where there are business organisations
Henri Fayol, a French mining engineer and director of mines in the 1880s, came up a management idea known as Fayolism. Fayol identified managerial activities as “concerned with drawing up the broad plan of operations of the business, with assembling personnel, co-ordinating and harmonising effort and activity” (Fayol, 1949) . Fayol emphasizes the important on