Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing newspapers
Among so many other mediums, it is of particular interest to note that the practice of photography is not simply bound to one side of the spectrum of creative expression. As much as it can be perceived as an emotional piece of art, a photo can also very well be seen as a showcase of the current social world through an objective lens. What it is that truly defines a photo as being either an artistic endeavor or a means for documentation, however, is the context in which it is meant to be viewed by a particular audience. One single picture, after all, could appear drastically different alongside an article in a newspaper than it would if it were to be framed and hung alongside other photos on a museum wall. This idea is especially prevalent in the pieces shown in the exhibition Freedom Now! Forgotten Photographs of the Civil Rights Struggle, wherein several photos are both seen as a standalone piece, as well as how they appeared in magazines or journals on the Civil Rights movement. Through comparing and contrasting several sets of these pictures, each displaying two vastly different ways in which they can be observed, the importance of context in regards to photography comes into full view, giving a larger perspective on what it is that gives a specific piece a certain meaning.
Given the subject matter of the aforementioned exhibition, it is best to first analyze one of the more provocative of the included pieces, as it is, interestingly enough, used as a means to garner sympathy for both sides of the Civil Rights movement depending on the type of context surrounding it. The photograph itself, captured by Charles Moore and subsequently titled as Firemen use High-Pressure Hoses against Protestors, depicts a powerful scene amidst of ...
... middle of paper ...
...ceived as is, without any outside influence making the viewer observe something they otherwise would not have considered. Thus, the application of context from other sources than the photographer often times muddles the original meaning that had been intended from the beginning. Of course, it is how the context is applied that makes all the difference, as on one hand, it can be used to in a way to contort a photograph’s meaning entirely through the use of text and captions that are meant to give the viewer and inaccurate perception of the image. Nevertheless, it can also be used to simply provide a better understanding of what the photo is depicting, thus providing not a different meaning, but a clearer one. Either way, it is the context that ultimately tells the viewer how to interpret a specific photograph, regardless of how it was actually meant to be perceived.
For my museum selection I decided to attend Texas State University’s Wittliff Collection. When I arrived, there was no one else there besides me and the librarian. To be honest, I probably would have never gone to an art museum if my teacher didn’t require me to. This was my first time attending the Wittliff Collection, thus I asked the librarian, “Is there any other artwork besides Southwestern and Mexican photography?” She answered, “No, the Wittliff is known only for Southwestern and Mexican photography.” I smiled with a sense of embarrassment and continued to view the different photos. As I walked through Wittliff, I became overwhelmed with all of the different types of photography. There were so many amazing pieces that it became difficult to select which one to write about. However, I finally managed to choose three unique photography pieces by Alinka Echeverria, Geoff Winningham, and Keith Carter.
Having such an image before our eyes, often we fail to recognize the message it is trying to display from a certain point of view. Through Clark’s statement, it is evident that a photograph holds a graphic message, which mirrors the representation of our way of thinking with the world sights, which therefore engages other
Photography allows us to maintain memories and relish them whenever we desire. Although some advocates might argue that people are no longer enjoying experiences instead taking more pictures, in the essay, “Why We Take Pictures”, by Susan Sontag, she conflates that photography can be used as a defense against anxiety and a tool of empowerment. I agree with Sontag on the significance of photographs and how it allows us to store a part of our extended relatives so we are able to hold on the memories of family. Therefore, we must appreciate how photography allows us to manage anxiety, express feelings and remember our loved ones.
Photography is defined at the art or practice of taking and processing photographs. To understand photography is having insight or good judgment to know how to take the picture, but also edit it if need be. Does photography limit our understanding of the world? What some people haven’t realized is that photography is all around us, whether it is in the person’s mind to see it or not. While we see photography throughout our daily routine, people dismiss the small types of photography and focus on the bigger sceneries like other countries beautiful cities and landscapes. It’s true that in this day and age, most photographs we see have been altered in some way. When photographers use Photoshop to edit our photos, we use many different ways to make that image appealing to the eye. Although, photographers unless told to do so will not change an image into something totally absurd that takes away from being astatically pleasing. Images are a gateway to the insight of the rest of the world’s cultures landscapes, and architecture, and photography is the key aspect to it. Photography is a one way to see the world, but it is better if you go and travel around the world to see it. In order to see if photography actually limits our understanding, we have to first look at the positive side of photography.
George Baker is an American art historian who is mainly known for his writings on photography. He is still alive and is employed as a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles and an editor of the journal October. Baker studied his undergrad at Yale and got his Ph.D. from Columbia University. He has five different publications. The article, Photography’s Expanded Field was written in the October journal in 2005 and was published by MIT press. The title of the article gives a clear understanding of what the article is going to be about. It explains the expansion of photography from post modern to the digital age. The author opens up the article with an understanding of how he views photography, this
In Gordon Parks’s untitled photograph, captured in New York is an ongoing protest, a stand of unity of all African Americans fighting for the Civil Rights Movement. The Civil Rights movement was “...struggle by African Americans in the mid-1950s to late 1960s to achieve Civil Rights equal to those of whites, including equal opportunity in employment, housing, and education, as well as the right to vote, the right of equal access to public facilities, and the right to be free of racial discrimination.” This photograph is a significant factor in the Civil Rights movement because the illustration it draws. This photograph illustrates the number of various protests, sadness through the solemn faces, and the unity of African Americans in a fight for their rights. This photograph exemplifies theses aspects by the means of, visual elements as in framing, focus, and angle shot. In this photograph, the life of African Americans is narrated and there is an aspect of persuasion to join the protest.
These aspects are strengthened by photographic representation, their connections to each other in a single image, greatly affects the audience, and demonstrates how photojournalism is capable of achieving more than verbal texts are able
In the broadest sense, all photography not intended purely as a means of artistic expression might be considered ‘documentary’, the photograph, a visual document, of an event, place, object, or person, providing evidence of a moment in time. Yet the term ‘documentary photography’ has a more specific meaning. The Life Library's Documentary Photography (1972) defined it as ‘a depiction of the real world by a photographer whose intent is to communicate something of importance—to make a comment—that will be understood by the viewer’.
Photography is commonly associated with fact, yet it has been a medium for fiction since its invention. Henry Peach Robinson was a Pictorialist photographer in the 1800s who was notable for his combination prints where h...
Photographs are taken, shown, and spread all over for the world to see. But the real question that should be on everyone's mind is, what do they really capture? Is it the essence of reality or what you want to believe? Knowledge and opinions of mankind are made from these simple pieces of paper. Yet, having this in mind, we educate our children and future generations to come that we should not judge a book by its cover. Opinions not only limit us from the outside world but they give us an “incalculable effect” of our morality. Susan Sontag's assertion that photographic technology opens a vast amount of events that represent a moment in time. Through justifiable statements, she illustrates that people carry a heedless mindset of the world looking at photographs. However, accessibility to the worlds ideals that may be obtained by a photograph is false. Photographs minimizes the truth behind the photo, it alters what the photographer wanted to viewer to unravel. Susan Sontag encompasses around the idea that photographs limit our understanding of the world without essential description...
It is hard to find an aspect of the humanities that photography did not impact. Throughout all of history and the advancements made in technology photography has been used to do everything from prove a theory in science, to record a special event in a person’s life. In today’s modern world the impact of photography can be seen daily. Developments such as Photo identification, films, photojournalism, and thousands of other advances in life have all come from photography. Though all these aspects of photography are amazing in themselves, the true element of photography that made it such an impactful advancement in the humanities was its ability to capture a moment in time, and give the middle-class an understandable and relatively cheap new artistic medium.
This exhibition analysis will define the theme of “normalcy” that arises in the innovative use of color photography presented in “William Eggleston at MoMA 1976.” Eggleston (1976) defines the important use of color photography to challenge the black and white dominance of the medium in the 1970s. MoMA exhibited Eggleston’s work in 1976 to show the importance of minimalism and normalcy that is part of the everyday life of Southerners in these photos. Eggleston’s pictures of people in Memphis, Tennessee bring forth a sense of privacy and normal everyday poses in these photos, which suggests a balance between formlessness and
Photography is a refuge and release for me. I work to capture the element of emotion throughout each frame. Each image draws upon a complex connection and reflects how I feel inside. Never shying away from conveying social messages of complicated subjects of racism, poverty, sexuality, abuse, and addiction.
As Kaldor and Linfield note, photojournalism grants viewers the opportunity to expand their ethical, political, and intellectual consciousness (Kaldor 2009; Linfield 2011, p. 46). Consequently, audiences have a moral obligation to look at injustice and acknowledge those who are suffering. Seeing injustice, however, does not necessarily translate to caring about, or acting on it; as rational, independent beings, viewers themselves need to make the mental leaps between seeing an image, changing modes of thought, and then motivating action (Kennedy 2015, p. 163). Therefore, photojournalism must be disburdened from the expectation that it alone can enact social change. As Taylor argues, “If photographs fail to induce action, the fault lies not with photography but with the larger system [that marginalizes and punishes victims of injustice]” (2000, p. 138). Ergo, photojournalists are responsible for the ethics of showing, while we are responsible for the ethics of seeing and acting (Linfield 2011, p.
Photography is not practiced by most people as an art. It is mainly a social rite, a defense against anxiety, and a tool of power (Sontag, 176). Photographs that have social and historic meaning form public opinion and spread the information. However, the point of view on the certain period of history changes and the fresh look at the photograph opens new historical pr...