Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political disagreement between north and south
Political disagreement between north and south
The United States social, political and economic in the reconstruction era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Political disagreement between north and south
Social studies Magazine Project Look I am doing this because it's a sleepless night Bourbon Triumvirate- The members in the Bourbon Triumvirate were Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon. The reason this trio was important during the post reconstruction era was because they were the most prominent and powerful politicians from 1872 to 1890 as they either held senate seats or governor's office. All three men supported white supremacy. John Brown and Joseph Gordon both used the convict labor system in which officials leased prisoners to private citizens for labor. These three men wanted to keep the old way of the south while making the south more industrial based like the north. Henry Grady- Grady was the managing editor for
the Atlanta constitution. Henry Grady used his influence to promote a New South program of Northern investment, Southern industrial growth, diversified farming, and white supremacy. Something he did to help Georgia was create the Grady Memorial Hospital in memorial of him. Most Southerners did not like Henry Grady's New South and someone named Thomas Watson called him out for opposing the farmers and submitting Georgia to northern interest. New South- New South created in 1874 by Atlanta Constitution managing editor Henry W. Grady, refers to the economic shift from an exclusively agrarian society to one that embraced industrial development.
scalawags. They all worked together to plan new state governments. Reconstruction died because of two main causes, the south tried to stop it and the north gave in.
Throughout the course of American political history rarely has there ever been a rivalry as fierce and contested as that of the one between Tennessee’s Andrew Jackson, and Kentucky’s Henry Clay. During their extensive political careers the two constantly seemed to cross paths differing in terms philosophically and ideologically. Simply put, these two men profoundly shaped the American Antebellum period, specifically involving the 1820’s to the 1840’s. Their notions of what was best for the country became the basis for their respective parties and consequently their differences in methodology facilitated countless battles in the American political atmosphere. The most significant issues that centered on these types of political skirmishes involved
Throughout the 1830-1840’s the opposing governmental parties, the Jacksonian Democrats and the Whigs, undertook many issues. The Whigs were a party born out of their hatred for President Andrew Jackson, and dubbed his harsh military ways as “executive usurpation,” and generally detested everything he did while he was in office. This party was one that attracted many other groups alienated by President Jackson, and was mainly popular among urban industrial aristocrats in the North. On the other hand, the Jacksonian Democrats were a party born out of President Andrew Jackson’s anti-federalistic ideals that was extremely popular among southern agrarians. A major economic issue that the two parties disagreed on was whether or not the United States should have a National Bank. Along with the National Bank, the two parties also disagreed on the issue of the Protective tariff that was enforced to grow Northern industry. Politically, the two parties disagreed on the issues of Manifest Destiny, or expansion, and ultimately Slavery. While the two parties essentially disagreed on most issues, there are also similarities within these issues that the two parties somewhat agree on.
Alexander Hamilton exerted the most influence in the new Federalist Party. He believed that only an enlightened ruling class could produce a stable and effective federal government. The government therefore needed the support of wealthy men. Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans defended more the rights of the common man and an agrarian society with little power from the federal government. His basic principle was "in general I believe the decisions of the people in a body will be more honest and more disinterested than those of wealthy men."
...en the result of slavery. The last major point where sectionalism was seen was in the Election of 1824 because people were only voting for people in their sectional region, rather than who they thought was he best candidate. In addition, all the candidates, Jackson, Adams, Clay, and Crawford were all from the same party, Republican, which contributed to the already growing sectionalism. (Doc I)
President Lincoln was succeeded by his vice president Andrew Johnson. Johnson was a southern democrat who believed in the union, however, he did not believe in black equality. Johnson believed that the planter class in the south had led their section of the country to ruin. As far as blacks were concerned, they were an inferior race to be held in some sort of subjugation to the dominant white population of the south. His attitude ran into a head on collision with that of the radical republicans in congress led by Thaddeus Stevens.
Therefore, in 1787, two delegates by the names of Roger Sherman and James Wilson introduced the Three Fifths compromise in the Philadelphia Convention. The Three Fifths compromise states that a slave be counted as three-fifths of a person. Therefore, the population of the southern states equaled the population of the northern states. Now that the populations were balanced, the south and the north sent the same amount of representatives to The House of Representatives. Pro-slavery southerners felt as if the north still had an advantage, but it was actually the south that had the advantage in the Senate and The House of Rep...
...ll the Republican political leaders, two third of the majorities of the house and the senate approved and sent the senates to approved the thirteenth amendment abolishing slavery. President Abraham Lincoln used his influences republican party leaders, and his campaign speech that he spoken from Springfield to Washington to persuasive and changed the South state’s mind. Lincoln wanted to end the civil neutral by stating that he was willing to conciliate the slaves’ states in the South, but that there will be no compromise that was acceptable of the expansion territory of the slavery.
The Whig Party “coalesced into Jackson opposition party” in 1832 (Democratic… 15). The name “Whigs” is derived from British designation for “anti-monarchists.” The Wigs, among whom were also John Q. Adams, Lyman Beecher, Horace Greely, or Abraham Lincoln, made fun of Andrew Jackson, calling him “King Andrew” (Democratic… 15). They were against slavery and alcohol consumption, supported internal improvements and claimed the education needs to be improved. The Whig Party didn’t last long; many of the members joined the Republican Party later.
The separation of the south and north was not the only separation the United States was going through, the Democratic Party had split. The northern and southern democrats turn on each other. After several delegates walk out of the democratic convention, Douglas, who was not supposed to be put up as a nomination for president because he would not support the idea to make all states have slaves, was nominated for president. After the fact that Douglas was nominated without the entire Democratic Party consent, the southern democrats nominated John C. Breckinridge, who believed that all the states should have slavery, thus a split in the Democratic Party. (Foner,496)
Although Jacksonian democrats held suspicion against the federal government’s past “bargains”, they, too, shared the evil. Contradicting themselves, after Jackson’s inauguration, those who claimed to have supported him in his election endeavors were rewarded with public office. The spoils system was thus established in Jacksonian democracy, leading to conspiracies. Those chosen, who were unworthy of their positions barely owned a positive trait to their name, for many were illiterate...
Throughout the 1820's to 1830's, Jacksonian Democrats took large strides in political democracy and individual liberty. At this time, the members of the party basically had one overwhelmingly large task on their minds: equal protection and equal benefits to all white male citizens and also, to prevent favoritism towards a specific region or class. Clearly, these ideals reflect what a democrat really is, someone looking for equal rights for all. Of course, in this case, that only applied to white men. This ideal that the democrats always tried to follow was reflected in a variety of different situations throughout the decade. The Jacksonian Democrats were at first strongly against the concept of a spoils system, which gave political positions to people, not solely based on whether they were qualified, but rather, because of their privileged place in society. They believed that a man should always earn their job rightfully. Thus, through this ideal, the democrats provided a more equal poli...
...gland were educated and founded Harvard College. They also believed in the common good by raising taxes based on the ability to pay. At that time, the ability to pay was based on wealth. The North had much more advantage then the South, even if it is with slaves, living, or education. The Monroe Doctrine on December 2, 1823 established unity. It was valued because all were free since it was followed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Andrew Jackson began a whole new era in American history. Amongst his greatest accomplishments were evoking the "common man" to be interested in government and tailoring democracy to satisfy the same "common man's" needs. Of course, Jackson could not go about making such radical changes without supporters, but that never surfaced as a problem. Jacksonian Democrats, as they came to be called, were great in number during the 1820's and 1830's. They advocated all of the issues that President Jackson did, and did so with great vigor. They thought of themselves very highly because they recognized their responsibilities as American citizens. They realized that as political leaders they had a true purpose- to protect and serve the American people. The Jacksonians justified their view of themselves in their sincere attempts to guard the United States Constitution by both promoting equality of economic opportunity and increasing political democracy, but they had their downfalls with issues of individual liberties.