Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on marxism literary criticism
Essay on marxism literary criticism
Essay on marxism literary criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on marxism literary criticism
The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov A review
Set in Moscow during the darkest period of Stalin's regime, in the
1930s after the Russian Revolution, The Master and Margarita is a
piece of literary alchemy. It is a fusion of Geothe's Faust, fragments
of autobiography, an alternative version of the crucifixion of Christ,
a tale of political repression and a meditation on the role of an
artist in a society bereft of freedom and individuality. The book does
not have a readily describable plot as the narrative structure is
intricate and complex, with several stories nestled in one; inside one
narrative there is another, and then another, and yet another. The
Master and Margarita begins by inter-weaving two apparently
unconnected tales and later introduces a third which unites the other
two narratives at the end.
The first narrative concerns a visit to Moscow (1930) by the devil in
the disguise as a professor of black magic, Professor Woland. Woland
and his infernal retinue, including a hit man with appalling dress
sense Koroviev, a vampire maid, Hella and a six foot black cat,
Behemoth who walks on his hind legs, drinks vodka and eats caviar,
wreck havoc and chaos in Moscow. They upset the literary world of
Moscow and disrupt the life of ordinary Muscovites by putting up a
black magic show. In the magic show, Woland showers the audience with
tempting gifts of money which later changes to strips of paper and
tempts the ladies with Parisian gowns and shoes which later disappear.
They succeed in comically befuddling an atheist Moscow which denies
the devil's existence with his supernatural feats, his predictions of
the future and his enigmatic stories of Pontius Pilate. First he
predicts that a noted ...
... middle of paper ...
...rd world of politics and
corruption, not to heaven, but to a world of two.
Thus in conclusion, The Master and Margarita shows just how important
freedom and individuality are and the power of literature to surpass
any human attempts to control it. It concludes that blind conformity
to any notion or ideal is the ultimate evil. Arenberg states that "the
Master demonstrates that each man's salvation lies within himself" and
that "Bulgakov recognized that men follow the path of least
resistance, denying their own imaginative capabilities in favour of
institutionalised ideologies, organized religion and conventional
morality". The book serves as a monument to all courageous authors who
in Salman Rushdie's words "attempt radical reformations of language,
form and ideas, those that attempt to do what the word 'novel' seems
to insist on: to see the world anew."
Life is a wheel rolling inexorably forward through the temporal realm of existence. There are those that succumb to its motion and there are a certain few, like Christ and Napoleon, who temporarily grasp the wheel and shape all life around them. "Normal" people accept their positions in life and are bound by law and morality. Extraordinary people, on the other hand, supersede the law and forge the direction and progress of society. Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, is the story of a group of people caught beneath the wheel and their different reactions to their predicament. One individual, Raskolnikov, refuses to acknowledge the bare fact of his mediocrity. In order to prove that he is extraordinary, he kills two innocent people. This despicable action does not bring him glory or prove his superiority, but leads to both his physical, mental, and spiritual destruction. After much inner turmoil and suffering, he discovers that when a person transgresses the boundaries of morality and detaches himself from the rest of humanity, faith in God and faith in others is the only path to redemption.
Suffering and Salvation in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov Condemned to be shot by a firing squad for radical ideas, the author of The Brothers Karamazov once found himself seconds away from death, only to be granted a reprieve moments before the firing. Although only a method intended to teach him a lesson, the trick had quite a harrowing effect on Dostoevsky. After his close encounter with death, Dostoevsky underwent a total change, and so all of his new notions became a part of "The Brothers Karamazov", which he wrote at the end of his life. For example, once he reexamined his values he began to reject the blindly accepted Russian beliefs. Spiritually, he altered so much that he emerged with the prophetic belief that the world's
Its hero, a naïve young man who accepts both society in general and his fellow-men as individuals at their own valuation, is in one terrible night presented with the vision of human Evil, and is ever afterwards “A stern, a sad, a darkly meditative, a distrustful, if not a desperate man . . .” whose “dying hour was gloom.” (Fogle
Philosophy can be defined as the highest level of clarity and understanding human thought can aspire to. In some ways, Plato’s Republic can be compared to George Orwell’s book 1984. It may seem strange to compare the two, however they are quite similar. Plato writes from the Western philosophy, while Orwell tells of a totalitarian society where all free thought is banned. However, the two versions of government, one being a utopian government, and the other being horrific, contain certain connections that will be made clear over the course of this paper.
This fiction symbolizes one of Marquez’s perfect examples of the magical elements that can highlight the disenchanted reality of the people, the critique of politicians, and to demonstrate that anyone is capable of changing. Since it is predictable that the best show for the audience, it is the one that makes anyone believe that their lives will be better if one is reelected.
Bulgakov, Mikhail. The Master and Margarita. Brophy College Preparatory. AP ENG 4: Blackboard, Nov. 2013
In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Solzhenitsyn uses small details and Shukhov’s mealtime rituals to demonstrate his small, personal bids for independence. When Shukov sits down for breakfast, one of the first things he does is remove his hat, for “he could never bring himself to eat with his hat on” (14). Nobody is telling Shukov what to do in this moment. By removing his hat to satisfy his own desire, he is gaining control of one small aspect of his morning routine and bringing himself incrementally closer to independence. Shukhov's spoon is another example of his desire to make his own decisions. The spoon is clearly one of Shukov’s few prized possessions. This is likely due to its origins. As Shukov sits down for breakfast, he pulls
Friedrich Nietzsche once said, “Dostoevsky, the only one who has taught me anything about psychology.” The two writers share many similarities and differences. Dostoevsky clearly had an effect on the thinking of Nietzsche. The two would be considered both philosophers and psychologists. Both writers became prominent in the late 19th century in Germany and Russia respectively. Dostoevsky was noted for his Russian literary classics and would be responsible for a flowering of late 19th century Russian literary culture. His Russian contemporaries include Leo Tostoy and Anton Chekov. Dostoevsky’s most famous works include The Brothers Karamozov, The Idiot, and Crime and Punishment. Nietzsche is most famous for his philosophical works such as thus spoke Zarathustra. The two writers have many similarities in their philosophy. They both see a changing role in religion. Nietzsche and Dostoevsky also differ sharply on some other aspects of life. One of these being the differing views on the role of the fatherland. Nietzsche’s beyond good and evil and Dostoevsky’s crime and punishment are two works that can be compared and contrasted to show the similarities and dissimilarities of the two geniuses. The two men offer great insights in these books on morality and the affect it can have on the actions of the individual and the society as a whole.
Natasha, Wolfe, and Khrenov have colorful dreams of distant lands. Nabokov wrote Natasha in 1924, a few years after the Russian Revolution. The Bolsheviks took control over Russia after the revolution and many of the rich were exiled or faced death. Natasha and her father could have been past nobility that was exiled to live in another country. The forced exile of the Khrenov family gives a purpose to the dreams they have. Khrenov remembers the village they lived in and the sawdust that covered the bridge. Khrenov also has nightmarish dreams where he sees a barrel of a gun pointed at him in his sleep. The dream with the gun could be a memory from his past when the police may have forced him and Natasha out of their old home. Wolfe’s dreams
Comparing two works of literature is like Calculus. The graph of a wave represents the intertwining of the two works: the trough symbolizes the minimum, opposed to the crest, which symbolizes the maximum. Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, is the minimum, as the creator’s actions onto the created are minimal in quantity and quality. In turn, Never Let Me Go, by Kazuo Ishiguro, is the maximum, as the creators’ actions onto the created are maximal. The two novels are united in the argument that the creator holds a responsibility to nurture the created, and the created hold a responsibility of filial piety to the creator. When joined, the reader can see that the creators playing god is an immoral and unnatural task.
Ivan’s non-acceptance of faith stems from the innocent suffering of children. There is in him an intense conflict between his desire for “rational” retributive justice, on the one hand, and the sublimity of universal forgiveness, on the other. The intensity of Ivan’s conflict between his desire for “rational” retributive justice, on the one hand, and the sublimity of universal forgiveness, on the other, is revealed by Dostoevsky’s underlining. Nonetheless, Ivan is unyielding in his refusal, which culminates in his famous declaration: “And so I hasten to give back my entrance ticket, and if I am an honest man I must give it back as soon as possible. . . . It’s not God that I don’t accept, Alyosha, only I most respectfully return Him my ticket.”
From the 1920’s up until his death Joseph Stalin was the leader of Russia. What ensued under Stalin’s reign didn’t evoke emotions of love for country within the Russian people. Under Stalin the people lived in constant fear because of an epidemic within their own country, genocide of Stalin’s own people by Stalin himself. From 1934 up until 1939 a period of mass fear swept over Russia and at the helm Stalin with his (helpers?) of mass killings, the NKVD which are the internal police. Russia has always had a form ‘state security service’ commonly thought of now as “the secret police”, but in 1929 under the direction of Stalin the NKVD was formed and though it may have a new name it still held the infamous fear and practices of its predecessors, the GPU, The GUGB, and others. Russian author Mikhail Bulgakov was alive during this period of fear, and one of the books he wrote titled The Master and Margarita shares a lot more than one similarity with Stalin and his regime of fear. In fact it seems like the author created this book as a commentary of the times because of the way he writes ...
A man who is said to be the most talented novelist in human history is named Leo Tolstoy. He wrote many of the most famous and treasured novels including War and Peace, and Death of Ivan Ilych. He grew up in an extremely wealthy family but left the extravagant lifestyle to die as an alone homeless man. There are many reasons why people believe Tolstoy to be interesting, intriguing, and the single most prized novelist in the world. In his short novel Death of Ivan Ilych, Ivan pictures his death from afar and waits in pain as it slowly approaches. Within his last three days of life, he scream a constant howl. Other than his obvious physical pain, he is also screaming due to the emotional pain he is experiencing as well. Three things that are
The story “The Darling” by Anton Chekhov, illustrates a woman that is lonely, insecure, and lacking wholeness of oneself without a man in her life. This woman, Olenka, nicknamed “Darling” is compassionate, gentle and sentimental. Olenka is portrayed for being conventional, a woman who is reliant, diligent, and idea less. Although, this story portrays that this woman, known as the Darling needs some sort of male to be emotionally dependant upon, it is as if she is a black widow, she is able to win affection, but without respect. Only able to find happiness through the refection of the beliefs of her lovers, she never evolves within the story.
Literary masterpieces are a reflection of society that helps educate by using spiritual, intellectual, and political themes. According to Woolf (2014), “…masterpieces are not single and solitary births; they are the outcome of many years of thinking in common, of thinking by the body of the people, so that the experience of the mass is behind the single voice” (para. 12). This paper will explore the powerful literary masterpieces from different cultures where their lessons are still relevant today. The characters and their interactions make the story entertaining, while the lesson to be learned from the characters makes it a masterpiece. Societies come and go, but the lessons from these stories never change. The purpose of this paper is to define what a masterpiece is, how it reflects on society, the qualities it contains, and how they are still relevant today.