Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of one's voice in writing
Importance of one's voice in writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of one's voice in writing
In “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscript,” Donald M. Murray makes it clear that any individual who writes their first draft is only just beginning the true process of writing. As Murray states, writing is a never ending process that constantly needs new revisions. His main goal of this passage is to allow writers to understand some of the strategies and approaches that come with revising a draft. Murray does provide many supporting evidence to convince a reader of his strategies to be very useful and I agree with this author on improving writers’ writings.
To begin with, Murray has a way of saying exactly what he wants to say by saying it in the correct vocabulary in which his audience falls under. For example, Murray is intentionally trying to convey readers who fall within the ranges of being an “amateur” writer. For the reason that his intentional audience is “amateur,” Murray knows not to use high vocabulary but rather base it on everyday language. It is this reason why many of his readers will take note of what he says to do since what he wants is
…show more content…
comprehendible. I say that this is a good way of relating to the audience and giving exactly what the audience wants to know. As Murray states, “deliver information which a reader wants to know or needs to know in a manner which is easily digested.” Furthermore, Murray did well in saying facts that numerous students can relate to, resulting in an attention grabber and causing those students to pay even closer attention to his useful strategies. With Murray stating “when students complete a first draft, they consider the job of writing done,” he immediately catches the attention of those who thought their first draft was good. Secondly, Murray explains how criticism is an important aspect to making one’s writing better especially by getting feedback from other peers. When it comes to criticism, being open to suggestions is something every writer should do. Incorporating the thoughts of others allows the writing to be viewed from different perspectives giving a better meaning. I agree with Murray about being open to criticism for the reason that other individuals have different ways of thinking and they may read things differently or have better ideas to include in the writing. In many of my past English assignments I would get feedback on writing and I would take it as something beneficial to my writing skills. Criticism is simply something beneficial that every writer should be encouraged to receive whether it is good or bad. After reading the main components that Murray states writers’ look for I was able to see how it is true that they are what makes a writing come together in a certain order.
Murray has all these steps done in the manner of the author’s perspective only. Firstly the author has to gather “specific, accurate, and interesting information.” Secondly the author has to find the meaning to his information followed by being aware of his or her audience. After, the author looks for form, structure, and development to create a certain pattern. Lastly, voice is what a writer listens to for a smooth writing. Many writings are set up in a certain way especially writings such as poems. Poems have a structure to how the poem looks as a whole and rhythm it follows. This is also a reason as to why I can agree with Murray about these being steps writers follow to make sure their writing is shown in a specific
way. Overall I enjoyed Murray’s reading it was very thought-provoking as well as informative to including many useful strategies for writers. As I read I realized that there are many steps a writer must do to be a good writer and even then the job of revising is never done. I understand why a true writer would feel that their work is never done or that the work needs more changes; there is always going to be that feeling of striving for something better. As Murray states, “The maker’s eye is never satisfied, for each word has the potential to ignite new meaning,” writers are constantly trying to find ways to change their words or look for criticism because they know that they can make their work better. Just as Murray say writing is never ending and I fully agree with his work.
Writing as a Re-Vision. Eds. Beth Alvarado and Barbara Cully. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing, 1996.
Ethnocentrism is the belief of one’s culture as superior opposed to other cultures. Ethnocentrism is a single minded. Cultural relativism in contrast to ethnocentrism, is the ability to view certain practices of a culture in the mentality of the the culture itself. Cultural relativism is more understanding with an absence of judgement. The TED talk from Chimamanda Adichi regarding, “The Danger of a Single Story” illustrates how we all can allow a one-sided story can isolate our thinking. She talks about how throughout her life she experienced many single sided stories that could have influenced her life; however, she learned from them. Adichi uses the analogy of a single story to equate to ethnocentrism. An example she used was when she was
According to Donald M. Murray’s essay The Maker’s Eye, revising a work of writing is an essential procedure a writer goes through in order to achieve the final draft. As other professional writers have mentioned, “writing is rewriting” each draft, which serves as an opportunity to rebuild the work that feels perhaps sketchy. In his essay, Murray incorporates the experiences of authors: Peter F. Drucker, Ray Bradbury, John Ciardi, Eleanor Estes, and others to assert the importance of the revising and editing process in works of writing. Given these points, Murray divides his essay into three main sections: which are becoming the enemy of our first draft, using audience and information from the seven elements of writing, and lastly finding the
The Art of reading appears as a practice that involve more than one components. The first one Murray talks about is the fact of “Reading for Experience”.
When I initially thought about writing style I believed that there would be some nice neat definition, and maybe a few rules that would govern writing with “style”. It turns out that I grossly underestimated this topic and while I knew that writing style would be a topic of considerable depth, I did not fully understand the degree that I would be pondering the issue of writing with “style”.
In the brief essay “Shitty First Drafts,” writer Anne Lamott describes the general writing process by use of humor and relatability. Lamott spills her own troubles and woes in a way that assures the reader they are not alone should they feel like their first attempt at a piece of writing is not topnotch material. To back herself up, Lamott gives mass examples of nameless authors she knows and how each made a success out of their shared strife. The writer herself spills what it means to feel hopeless when writing a first draft. It appears her method to success is to surround herself with positive, like-minded individuals, as well as to not take oneself too seriously when painfully jotting down the first words of an essay. In my personal life,
The first trait is “Ideas”. Ideas are the main focus of the paper (McQuinn, 2007). By putting these images, documents and stories together you develop a theme to hold the readers attention. Conn McQuinn uses a chart with each trait, within this chart he ask the reader to focus on the following with each trait: preparing, emerging, engaging, flourishing, refining, transitioning, maturing, extending and continuing. The question would be “how do writers develop in the trait of ideas?” This would happen by preparing a drawing with illustrated thoughts to communicate ideas. As the idea develops you may add anecdotes and clear details to get the main idea across to the reader. The trait “Ideas” can be compared to the “Prewriting phase” by Arlov. Prewriting is the “I think first” phase (Arlov, 2007, p4). Prewriting is considered the most crucial of the stages in the writing process, although it sometimes is the most neglected. Just as athletes need to warm up before a game, writers also need to warm up. In preparing for writing, you have to decide on a topic, identify an audience and purpose for writing, and gather ideas and data.
There are usually questions given in the rubric that I seek to answer in my essay which according to Murray is the first thing writers should look for in their draft: information. When discussing my path and comparing how it aligns to Murrays path, I tend to not focus as much as I should on meaning, sometimes in past essays and still to this day I have a problem with getting a little off topic or adding something to an essay that has no significance to the topic. Such as in the Rhetorical Analysis essay I started focusing more on my personal opinion instead of examining the rhetorical situation. As previously stated, I always consider the audience when writing essays. In our Establishing a Literacy Assignment I made sure the audience understood what literacy I established and the sponsors who helped me establish the literacy. Without those pieces of information, my paper wouldn’t have told the reader what they needed to know and, therefore, would’ve been
As you may have noticed, the premise of my short story is similar to the ideas presented in the Ted talk “The Danger of a Single Story.” Chimamanda Ngozi Adichi, the speaker of the Ted talk described what happens when complex human beings and situations are reduced to a single narrative (Brooks). For example, many individuals believe that all Africans are extremely poor and are also victims of starvation but in reality, only a certain percentage of Africans fit that description. In my short story, the main character Stevenson, creates a single story about himself and his surroundings. The main difference between my short story and the traditional idea of a single story is that Stevenson is reducing himself down to a single story instead of
Anyone who is doing any type of writing piece has a process. They may not know it but it is there and it exists. It is one’s approach to their piece and how they go about accomplishing it. It has to do with how you write it, how many drafts you do, as well as your revision process if you even have one. My writing process however has room for improvement. A summation of my writing process consist of heavy planning, one draft, and little revisions. Anne Lamott, Shirley Rose, and Kathleen Yancey all drew attention to major points through their writing pieces that support and dispute my writing process. Through their pieces they have found a way to inspire, inform, and entertain me all at the same time while passing along great information that
People need to learn the structures of writing before being creative. Creativity is both nature and nurture. Many believe revisions shouldn’t be made. I understand where Bishop and Starkey are coming from how the first draft is important, because the art and creativity is in the words written uncorrected. I never fix my first draft when it’s a personal writing assignment.
A Danger of a Single Judgment In the speech "A Danger of a Single Story," Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie discusses what the danger of a single story is. A danger in a single story is believing that someone is no more than what their stereotype is telling us they are. People tend to judge someone or something based off what they already know about the group of people. This leads to someone believing something that could be completely wrong, and that is what Adichie shows us throughout her speech.
Writing papers has been one of my biggest fears as a student. High school English class prepared me for the editing of my essays, for example, grammatical errors, spelling, font errors, and things that were under the category of fixing my paper. I realized that the writing process requires more than just editing, you have to understand that the paper is like a human body, it cannot function if every single part is not effective. I can certainly say that I have improved as a writer a great deal and this portfolio and the final revised drafts of my work certainly can argue for that. English 101 was certainly different from my other English classes; we actually focused on different parts of the writing process in each class instead of wasting our time discussing the same components of the process over and over again. As I reflect on my experiences throughout the semester of English 101 I am aware that I have met very important requirements of writing that I feel were very valuable for me as a student and my writing has improved progressively.
Tactics such as grabbing the audience, using literary devices, creating an outline and a rough draft, and many other rules can be helpful to create a good paper. However, using those rules as the focus of writing can be problematic. Mike Rose identifies how the misuse of rules can lead to writers block; he also suggests how to prevent this from happening by using rules as guidelines rather than actual rules. This will help ensure good writing without the stress of writers block. Anne Lamott advocates creating several first drafts because, “Almost all good writing begins with terrible first efforts” (Lamott 530). Although creating multiple first drafts isn’t a rule of writing, it can improve one’s writing significantly. According to Lamott and Clark, respectable authors do not always strictly use rules and yet become bestselling novelists. Placing excessive emphasis on rules of writing can be detrimental and can act as culprit to difficulty writing, however, when these rules are viewed more as guidelines, it can elevate many issues while writing and can lead to successful
When people think of success, they think of people with money, fame, or power. But how did those people get to be in that position? What made them successful? More often than not, the stepping stones to success are forgotten once success has been achieved. But without the little steps that make up the whole, the whole can never exist. Writing is similar in this way; as we draft, review and edit, our smaller steps eventually make up a successful, complete paper. Writing frequently has allowed me to slowly get better over time, and this is important on the road to becoming a successful writer. As I’ve grown over the years, I’ve used the building blocks provided to me as steps to help me excel in everything I do. My eventual successes can only