The Mad Scientist

1665 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Frankenstein comparison to monster

The mad scientist is an interesting figure in contemporary culture, usually represented by an evil genius that uses fictitious technology in an attempt to ‘play God.’ History has shown us that the mad scientist is not far off from reality: From the alchemist Paracelsus claiming the ability to create life to Tesla and Newton using science to challenge the mysteries of the universe. We also see the mad scientist in 19th century literature. Both Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and H.G. Wells’ The Island of Dr. Moreau, showcase this character in all of his glory and destruction. These pieces of literature are woven into the anthology, Making Humans, which is cited in this analysis. In these novels, we see ‘the creator’ (Victor Frankenstein) versus ‘the imitator’ (Dr. Moreau). These are two different attempts at ‘playing God,’ and take the audience to a place where morality is no longer a question of what’s right or wrong, but how wrong and what that means for humankind as we know it.

Let’s start with Victor Frankenstein, in classification of the mad scientist I prefer to call him ‘the creator.’ His journey starts with his desire to assume the role of God among a new race, telling Walton, “A new race would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me” (Shelley 48). Victor’s desire for knowledge lead him to the hope that he can recreate God’s work through science. In order to do this, has to dig up and assemble dead bodies into a single being that he will inject the breath of life into. As the creator, Its necessary to compare him to the God in Genesis which states, “And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man becam...

... middle of paper ...

...ientific process results in a multitude of failed experiments who are simultaneously cast to live a life of false religion and pain, only to revert back to their primal ways. By exploring what makes these mad scientists immoral, I have come to the conclusion that science itself can’t provide moral guidance and the insatiable desire for scientific discovery can cause one to forget about what lies outside of science, mankind. So next time you decide to challenge Darwin or God himself, remember that just because we can doesn’t necessarily mean that we should.

Works Cited

New International Version. 1984. Bible Gateway. Web. 10 March 2011.

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Making Humans.Ed. Judith Wilt. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003.

17-171. Print.

Wells, H.G. The Island of Dr. Moreau. Making Humans. Ed. Judith Wilt. Boston: Houghton

Mifflin, 2003. 174-268. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Essay Comparing Frankenstein And Flowers For Algernon

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    The story of Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley is revered as one of the greatest novels to be formulated. It takes the point of view of a scientist named ‘Victor Frankenstein’ who is fuelled by an insatiable thirst of expanding his knowledge. His interests draw to that of being able to give things life where he takes the seat of god feeling that he has the power to do all he envisions, which in the end destroys him. Almost 150 years later the book Flowers for Algernon written by Daniel Keyes and published in 1959, manages to recreate the conflict between science and ethics and the implications of ungoverned scientific experimentation. The book observes a young man named Charlie who has a mental disorder, he continuously seeks to “become smart” and is attending a special school to achieve his goal. While visiting this school he is

    Read More

  • Ethical Uncertainties of Science in Frankestein by Mary Shelley

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tests the motives and ethical uncertainties of the science in her time period. This is a consideration that has become more and more pertinent to our time, when we see modern scientists are venturing into what were previously unimaginable territories of science and nature, through the use of things like human cloning and genetic engineering. Through careful assessment, we can see how the novel illustrates both the potential dangers of these scientific advancements and the conflict between that and creationism.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein: Mary Shelley's Ability to Create Sympathy for the Monster

    1840 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is ‘one of the pioneering works of modern science fiction’, and is also a frightening story that speaks to the ‘mysterious fears of our nature’. Mary Shelley mocks the idea of “playing God”, the idea that came from the Greek myth of Prometheus, of the Greek titan who stole Zeus’ gift of life. Both the story of Frankenstein and Prometheus reveal the dark side of human nature and the dangerous effects of creating artificial life. Frankenstein reveals the shocking reality of the consequences to prejudging someone. The creature’s first-person narration reveals to us his humanity, and his want to be accepted by others even though he is different.

    Read More

  • Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster. & nbsp; Science is a broad field that covers many aspects of everyday life and existence.  Some areas of science include the study of the universe, the environment, dinosaurs, animals, and insects.  Another popular science is the study of people and how they function.  In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is an inspiring scientist who studies the dead.  He wants to be the first person to give life to a dead human being.  He spends all of his Frankenstein is to blame for the tragedy, not the monster he has created, because he is the   mastermind behind the whole operation, and he is supposed to have everything under control, working properly as a good scientist should. & nbsp; Although some critics say that the monster Victor has created is to blame for the destruction and violence that followed the experiment, it is Victor who is the responsible party.  First, Victor, being the scientist, should have known how to do research on the subject a lot more than he had done.  He obviously has not thought of the consequences that may result from it such as the monster going crazy, how the monster reacts to people and things, and especially the time it will take him to turn the monster into the perfect normal human being.&nbsp something that would take a really long time and a lot of patience which Victor lacks.  All Victor really wants is to be the first to bring life to a dead person and therefore be famous.  The greed got to his head and that is all he could think about, while isolating himself from his friends and family.  In the play of  Frankenstein, when Victor comes home and sets up his lab in the house, he is very paranoid about people coming in there and & nbsp; I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body.  For this I deprived myself of rest and health.  I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. (156)  & nbsp; Victor is saying that he has isolated himself for two years and in the end, he is not at all happy because of the bad outcome.  He also adds, "Winter, spring and summer passed.so deeply was I engrossed in my occupation" (156).  By spending most of his time inside on his experiment, never going out, but mostly worrying about his success,  he has got himself crazier.  This has made him lose sight of his surroundings and judgment & nbsp; Moreover, the monster should not be held responsible for killing Victor's family members and friends as shown in the book and movie, because it is Victor who has brought a dead creature back to life.  He expects the monster to know everything when he wakes up cool, calm, and collected.  But when the monster is awakened, he does not know anything.  He sees a world different from what he is used to, which makes him get nervous and scared, so he&nb has removed him from  dead.  With the dawning of life, the monster has to learn about his new environment.  In the play of Frankenstein, the monster starts to gradually get used to things.  The problems he encounters are with Victor's assistant, Peter Krempe,  Victor's friend, Henry, and other family members, including Elizabeth, and these are reactions to how these people treat him.  These reactions are clearly shown in the movie of Young Frankenstein, where Victor tries to teach the monster how to live like to show off the monster to an audience in a dance routine of sorts.  But then people start to scream,  panic and throw things at the monster, so he reacts by attacking them to defend himself.  In this case, it is clear that Victor tries to push the monster too hard because he wants to be famous.  

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Frankenstein And Never Let Me Go

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since the beginning of time man has been infatuated with the idea of pushing the human body to its limits by the use of science. The Space program is the best example of science helping humans accomplish things never before thought possible. In the age of technology and scientific advancement ideas that once seemed like science fiction, for example people walking on the moon, are now a reality. In order to push human development, ethics and morals have been pushed to the side. Necessary evils have been accepted as part of science without a second thought. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, plays God by creating a monster out of body parts and bringing it to life. When Frankenstein realizes the full extent to what he’s done, he abandons the monster leaving it confused and lonely. The monster then

    Read More

  • Examples Of Juxtaposition In Frankenstein

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Living in 18th century Germany, Victor Frankenstein, driven by his love for science and fascination for nature, lived as a highly esteemed chemist. However, as this passion began to dominate his life, Frankenstein began his work on creating a living man from scratch, and would not rest until it was complete. In her novel “Frankenstein”, Mary Shelley uses character development of Frankenstein and the Creature as well as juxtaposition between the lives that both characters lead to show that, although they are seemingly quite different, they are strangely alike.

    Read More

  • Creation and Alienation in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    3436 Words  | 7 Pages

    Creation, why is one drawn to the idea of it? Is it perhaps something that is within us all, an innate desire that we all possess, that desire being the power to give life to something, and in doing so, playing the role of God? In Victor Frankenstein’s case, these are definitely questions that one might ask. When we are introduced to Victor, we come to learn that he has a thirst for knowledge, and is passionate about following his dream of understanding the miracles of the world, particularly, the miracle o...

    Read More

  • Who Is the Real Monster in Frankenstein?

    1708 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.

    Read More

  • Fertilization In Frankenstein

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over thousands of years, creating life is a divine power of God, giving people the right to be born and live. However, many scientists have attempted to play the role of God for the pursuit of knowledge in the scientific world by cloning or in-vitro fertilization, stirring up many encounters of moral dilemmas and ethical debates. In the book Frankenstein, Mary Shelley has captured this controversial concern by portraying Doctor Frankenstein’s enthusiasm of chasing the dangerous knowledge, which becomes a heated discussion of morality for readers and evaluators.

    Read More

  • Monstrosity in Frankenstein

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Vistor Frankenstein and Henry Jekyll

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are two horrific tales of science gone terribly wrong. Shelley?s novel eloquently tells the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who creates a living monster out of decomposed body parts, while Stevenson?s novel describes the account of one, Henry Jekyll, who creates a potion to bring out the pure evil side to himself. Although the two scientists differ in their initial response and action to their creations, there are strong similarities between their raging curiosity to surpass human limitation, as well as their lack of responsibility concerning their actions. These similarities raise an awareness of human limitation in the realm of science: the further the two scientists go in their experiments, the more trouble and pain they cause to themselves and to others.

    Read More

  • Not Born a Monster: Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

    1498 Words  | 3 Pages

    Victor Frankenstein, the main character in Mary Shelley’s novel, is the creator of the monster. When Victor created the monster, he believed he created the monster for the betterment of humankind, but he actually created the monster because he desired to prove to the world that an average human can do Godly acts. The desire to create the monster goes back to Victor’s childhood. As a young kid, Victor’s passions always lied in science and chemistry and in college; he became obsessed with the idea of creating life out of inanimate objects. He then decided to specialize in Alchemy. Within Shelley’s book Frankenstein, Victor said:

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley expresses various ethical issues by creating a mythical monster called Frankenstein. There is some controversy on how Mary Shelley defines human nature in the novel, there are many features of the way humans react in situations. Shelley uses a relationship between morality and science, she brings the two subjects together when writing Frankenstein, and she shows the amount of controversy with the advancement of science. There are said to be some limits to the scientific inquiry that could have restrained the quantity of scientific implications that Mary Shelley was able to make, along with the types of scientific restraints. Mary Shelley wrote this classic novel in such a way that it depicted some amounts foreshadowing of the world today. This paper will concentrate on the definition of human nature, the controversy of morality and science, the limits to scientific inquiry and how this novel ties in with today’s world.

    Read More

  • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Can Science Go Too Far?

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s Sci-Fi horror known as Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus has become a classic novel in history. This dark tale touches on every subject of humanity. One of Shelley’s biggest themes is a big question in the science world we live in, nearly 200 years after publication of the book. That question being can science go too far, is there a line that shouldn’t be crossed? Shelley uses the plot of her story to serve as a warning to readers to be careful when dealing with this imaginary line. Shelley’s tale of a mad scientist and the repercussions he suffers from his experiment is a timeless story. As technology is being pushed to the brink of morality in the modern day, this question has become a huge part of the modern world of science we are living in.

    Read More

  • Science And Pseudoscience

    2640 Words  | 6 Pages

    How can we make intelligent decisions about our increasingly technology-driven lives if we do not understand difference between the myths of pseudoscience, New Age thinking and fundamental zealotry and the testable hypothesis of science? Can we prevent such celebrated fallacies such as witchcraft, faith healings, demons, and UFO’s from virtually banishing scientific thought? Science carries us toward an understanding of how the world is, rather than how we would wish it to be. Though its findings may not in all cases, be immediately comprehensible or satisfying. But when we pass beyond the barrier of questions, when the findings and methods of science get us through, when we fully understand and put this knowledge to use, we can feel deeply satisfied. Science has illuminated the way to truly stupendous advances by human beings in a few centuries. As science has upset some truly ancient religious beliefs in its theory of evolution, it has also upset some clergy. They’ve responded with witch hunts, torture chambers, executions, and truly boggling contemporary brainwashing campaigns. Each questions basic notions about where as species came from and are headed. Without condemning these reactionary trends, there is a better way to understand such matters. The answer is science.

    Read More

More about The Mad Scientist

Open Document