Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing Flowers for Algernon to Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The story of Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley is revered as one of the greatest novels to be formulated. It takes the point of view of a scientist named ‘Victor Frankenstein’ who is fuelled by an insatiable thirst of expanding his knowledge. His interests draw to that of being able to give things life where he takes the seat of god feeling that he has the power to do all he envisions, which in the end destroys him. Almost 150 years later the book Flowers for Algernon written by Daniel Keyes and published in 1959, manages to recreate the conflict between science and ethics and the implications of ungoverned scientific experimentation. The book observes a young man named Charlie who has a mental disorder, he continuously seeks to “become smart” and is attending a special school to achieve his goal. While visiting this school he is …show more content…
To compare the two novels by genre they are equivalent in that they both take a dive into the waters of science fiction, a very intriguing genre. Although they sit at the far end of each other as Frankenstein focuses on a dark, gothic scene of science fiction which is largely based off the time it was written in. Whereas Flowers for Algernon is more purely Science fiction and the genre of horror is not prevalent. Frankenstein takes place in Geneva, Switzerland where Victor talks about his childhood and how his parents had met. Throughout the story he finds himself travelling all around Europe from Bavaria all the way north to the Arctic where he persists to hunt down the monster and inevitably where his journey ends. However, the opposite is shown in Flowers for Algernon as the setting is set and remains in Chicago, New York where the story carries out. As for the characters, the most noticeable similarities would be Victor Frankenstein and Dr Strauss and Professor Nemur from Flowers for
Both characters were similar in how they were ‘resurrected’ in each of their books. Frankenstein performed an experiment through a process involving galvanism to produce the Creature, and
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tests the motives and ethical uncertainties of the science in her time period. This is a consideration that has become more and more pertinent to our time, when we see modern scientists are venturing into what were previously unimaginable territories of science and nature, through the use of things like human cloning and genetic engineering. Through careful assessment, we can see how the novel illustrates both the potential dangers of these scientific advancements and the conflict between that and creationism.
Shelley, Mary. "From Frankenstein." The Example of Science. Ed. Robert E Lynch and Thomas B. Swanzey. New York: Pearson Publishing, 2000. 152-156.
Frankenstein, a novel by Mary Shelley, illustrates the trials including Victor Frankenstein's triumphs, a character who owned a lovely with memorable life experiences that shaped the independent college student he became. Despite Victor growing up in a welcoming setting, he struggled to find the intellectual purpose of acquiring a college education in his physical science interest to generate the likelihood of reviving a dead corpse with electricity to acquire the comfortability to feel like God. Mary Shelley used diction and imagery to convey shifts in mood that supported the plot of chapters one through five in Frankenstein to inundate the reader with the feelings the characters of the story were facing.
Like all works that have been taught in English classes, Frankenstein has been explicated and analyzed by students and teachers alike for much of the twentieth and all of the twenty-first century. Academia is correct for doing so because Frankenstein can appeal to the interests of students. Students, teachers and experts in the areas of medicine, psychology, and sociology can relevantly analyze Frankenstein in their respective fields. However, Peter Brooks explains in “Godlike Science/Unhallowed Arts: Language and Monstrosity in Frankenstein” that Shelly had presented the problem of “Monsterism” through her language. According to Brooks, Monsterism is explicitly and implicitly addressed in Shelly’s language. While this may be correct, Brooks does it in such a way that requires vast knowledge of subjects that many readers may not be knowledgeable in. After summarizing and analyzing the positive and negative qualities of Brooks’ work, I will explain how the connection of many different fields of study in literature creates a better work.
In today’s world of genetically engineered hearts and genetically altered glowing rats, the story of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, seems as if it could be seen in the newspapers in our near future. The discoveries seen in modern science, as well as in the novel, often have controversy and negative consequences that follow them, the biggest of which being the responsibility the creator of life has to what has been created. Victor Frankenstein suffers from a variety of internal and external conflicts stemming from the creation of his monster, which in return also experiences similar problems. Shelley uses these tumultuous issues to portray the discrepancies between right and wrong, particularly through romanticism and the knowledge of science.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
Victor Frankenstein finds himself exploring the world of science against his fathers wishes but he has an impulse to go forward in his education through university. During this time any form of science was little in knowledge especially the chemistry which was Victors area if study. Victor pursues to go farther than the normal human limits of society. “Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge, and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow” (Chapter 4). He soon finds the answer he was looking for, the answer of life. He becomes obsessed with creating a human being. With his knowledge he believes it should be a perfe...
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are two horrific tales of science gone terribly wrong. Shelley?s novel eloquently tells the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who creates a living monster out of decomposed body parts, while Stevenson?s novel describes the account of one, Henry Jekyll, who creates a potion to bring out the pure evil side to himself. Although the two scientists differ in their initial response and action to their creations, there are strong similarities between their raging curiosity to surpass human limitation, as well as their lack of responsibility concerning their actions. These similarities raise an awareness of human limitation in the realm of science: the further the two scientists go in their experiments, the more trouble and pain they cause to themselves and to others.
With the advancement of technology and science, we are now able to genetically modify animals. Mary Shelley found a way to make science an epitome, and confirms what could happen if science is taken too far. In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is considered to be a historical novel, based on scientific advancements. In this novel Shelley depicts her own definition of human nature, by showing the creature and the ways that humans react to him. The novel also showed the differences between morality and science.
In 1817 Mary Shelley wrote her famous novel Frankenstein. Over the years, this story has become a favorite tale of many people around the world. It has been adapted several times as it has been retold. While the original tale shares many similarities with newer versions, it has been modified to make the story more appealing to current generations and the world of film. The movie Frankenstein shares similarities and differences with Shelley’s original tale. Aspects such as characters, plot, and setting were modified when this famous tale was brought to life.
The movie “Them” (1954) depicted monster as creatures who exhibit similar behaviors to humans, but are stronger and better at surviving. Similarly, the novel Frankenstein portrayed monster as a creature who is similar to a human, as in it has the same intelligences, survival behaviors, and overall body structure, but is stronger than humans. In both cases, the monster are a result of what a person or humans did, and they did not have any say in their creation. For example, Victor created the creature out of his own obsession and the giant ants were a consequence of nuclear material left over from a nuclear test. Furthermore, the creature did not choose to look the way he did and the giant ants did not choose to be giants. However, once their
“Intelligence without ambition is like a bird without wings.” -Salvador Dali. Throughout the story, Charlie Gordon experiences life and learns many valuable lessons. All he wanted was to be intelligent and have friends, and he definitely had the motivation. Before the procedure, he had an IQ of sixty-eight, and after, it was tripled to two hundred and four. But now, Charlie is going to die because of the results from the surgery. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur made a poor decision by choosing Charlie Gordon as the test subject for the intelligence-changing procedure.
When one attempts to use their power of science to portray God, it often includes the death of humans even if one's intentions are to bring change to the science community. Although Frankenstein successfully brought his creation to life, and the creature considered him as God, Shelley warns her readers of the consequences that one has to face for abusing science and playing God`s role. Frankenstein`s intentions were not to misuse his power of science but, the results of his attempt to re-define nature was harmful to society, himself and the