The movie “Them” (1954) depicted monster as creatures who exhibit similar behaviors to humans, but are stronger and better at surviving. Similarly, the novel Frankenstein portrayed monster as a creature who is similar to a human, as in it has the same intelligences, survival behaviors, and overall body structure, but is stronger than humans. In both cases, the monster are a result of what a person or humans did, and they did not have any say in their creation. For example, Victor created the creature out of his own obsession and the giant ants were a consequence of nuclear material left over from a nuclear test. Furthermore, the creature did not choose to look the way he did and the giant ants did not choose to be giants. However, once their …show more content…
existence were discover, it was automatically decided that both are monster and have to be exterminated. Both creatures seem to have been invitablely label as monster because both were stronger than humans and could easily destroy humans if they so choose. Furthermore, ironically, as soon as the creatures are labeled as monsters they are consider as their own thing. As in, their origin/creator is taken out of the condemnation process. In both cases, the creature and the giant ants, both Victor and the army were not really punish for creating the creature and the giant ants. Instead the creature and the ants are seen as a threat and simply needs to be killed. In both cases, even though both the creature and the giant ants showed similar behaviors to human behavior, these qualities either amplify why they should be exterminated or were simply ignored. Additionally, when the monster’s do something kind everyone still runs and condemns them and when they do something bad, it just validates more why the monsters should be killed.
Therefore, there is no way for the monster to be treated kindly and fair. For example, when the creature tries to do good things for the people, as soon as the people saw him, they immediately disregard what he has done and convicts him. When the creature gets frustrated and angry, people just uses his anger as validation to label him as a monster. The giant ants on the other hand, were simply behaving like ants normally do, but because they are bigger and could easily harm humans, they too were immediately label as …show more content…
abnormal/monster. By categorizing something as monster, we as humans can separate ourselves from it and can more easily destroy it without guilt and pressure from other humans.
We as humans define the word monster as something very bad, destructive, and unneeded. Thus, anyone who helps get rid of this things is consider a hero because they are doing something good for society. So as Jeffrey Jerome Cohen mention in “Monster Culture”, "[i]n the United States, Native Americans were presented as unredeemable savages so that the powerful political machine of Manifest Density could push westward with disregard." (8) In other words, once the Native American people are seen and understood by other humans as monsters who will hurt them (other humans), they would be doing the whole world a great deed by removing the Native Americans or force them to change. It was a way to justify their actions against a group who were just living their lifestyle and who are similar to them. This is similar to both Frankenstein and Them because both creatures simply just wanted to live and were just living the way they knew how. However, because both are different and because they had the potential to harm humans they were labeled as
monsters. Although the general concept of what a monster is relatively the same in both, one of the main characteristics that does make “Them” different from both the novel and the theory piece is that, the giant ants were ants and did not possess any sort of humanoid appearance. However, as mention before and mention in the film when the doctor is debrief the military and senator about what the average size ant can do, he said that ants exhibit similar behaviors to humans. The doctor claimed that ants started war, campaign, turn their captive into slaves, and has a similar social structure as ours. This was part of
But in the case of Frankenstein’s monster the monster is only named monster. At first, he was just about as innocent as a newborn. It is the people who make him the way he is. Everyone has good and evil inside them, so no one might actually determine who the monsters and the men really are.
Many times throughout history, one person has tried to prove themselves better than God or nature. Nature, however, always prevails in the end. The Romantics of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries believed that nature was a glorious and powerful force that was one with God, and emphasized this point in their works. Two such romantics were the couple Percy and Mary Shelley, who through their works Ozymandias and Frankenstein, showed the disastrous consequences defying nature could have. Both authors had experienced loss; the loss of some of their children and later Mary’s loss of Percy in a boating accident. These experiences showed them how powerful nature was, and how pointless it was to defy it. Both Mary and Percy’s belief in this showed through in their writing. So, despite how different Frankenstein and Ozymandias seem at first, both works reveal a common lesson: One should never believe themselves to be above nature, and if one does it will never end well.
Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein is about a creature born in an unaccepting world. Shelley's idea of Gothicism changed the subgenre of horror, due to its dark look into nature. It became an influence on Tim Burton's movie Edward Scissorhands, moved by the sadness of the creature trying to fit into society, he creates a monster of his own. Mary Shelley and Tim Burton use literary and cinematic elements to show that isolation from society can destroy your relationship with others.
1. He came like a protecting spirit to the poor girl who committed herself to his care.
The repercussions of treating sentient life as monsters or miscreation’s is disastrous. When non-human conscious life is created it is easier to treat these creations as outsiders rather than accepting them. There are two stories that show this clearly. The novel Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelly and the film Ex Machina by Alex Garland. When self-conscious life is created it must be treated as such.
The Creature, Victor Frankenstein’s creation, is shaped into a monster through its experiences, instead of the nature of itself, which is more expected. Victor Frankenstein, on the other hand, is shaped into a monster because of his mind’s power-hungry nature. Victor treats his creature poorly and he himself becomes wicked. While the Creature also becomes wicked in the end, its actions are more justified because multiple people treated it poorly, causing the Creature to lash out. Even though Victor Frankenstein and the Creature both turn into wicked monsters, to some extent, only one of
Frankenstein is a horror movie that tells the story of Dr. Henry Frankenstein’s experiment. In search for the fame and glory of playing to be god, he reaches a point where he is able to revive dead people. In this version of Frankenstein’s monster we see a selfish and careless scientist that created a creature with his intelligence. The way the character is shown reflects how ambitious someone can be to reach to be known in the world. This movie makes the people who are watching to feel empathy on the poor creature. This poor creature that did not want to live in a life where everyone is going to hate him for having a horrible aspect and not following rules that he has no idea about.
Both characters from the novels Prometheus and Victor Frankenstein were similar because they were both intelligent. Victor loved science, he sued to go on journeys to seek more information about life and death, because at home he had nobody to teach him.” My father was not scientific, and I was left to struggle with a child's blindness, added to a student's thirst for knowledge. (Victor Frankenstein quotes on education). And he even studied abroad to see more knowledge on his favorite subject. This created major conflicts with his professor at the university but also admiration among professors and peers.
James Whale's Frankenstein is a VERY loose adaptation of Mary Shelley's 1818 novel. The spirit of the film is preserved in its most basic sense, but the vast majority of the story has been entirely left out, which is unfortunate. The monster, for example, who possesses tremendous intellect in the novel and who goes on an epic quest seeking acceptance into the world in which he was created, has been reduced to little more than a lumbering klutz whose communication is limited to unearthly shrieks and grunts. Boris Karloff was understandably branded with the performance after the film was released, because it was undeniably a spectacular performance, but the monster's character was severely diminished from the novel.
In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the main theme revolves around the internal and external consequences of being isolated from others. Being isolated from the world could result in a character losing his/her mental state and eventually causing harm to themselves or others. Because both Victor Frankenstein and the creature are isolated from family and society, they experienced depression, prejudice, and revenge.
In gothic novels tragic figures are symbols of pain to the characters. Victor Frankenstein brings misfortune to his loved ones, which concludes to his overall tragedy. Ironically the monster in this novel is Frankenstein the creator not the creature. He has seven victims including himself and his fall is due to his ambition to be superior.
Monsters can come in various physical forms, but all monsters share the same evil mentality. A Monster is a being that harms and puts fear within people. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a prime example of how appearance does not determine whether a creature is a monster or not. In the story, Victor Frankenstein tries to change nature by creating a super human being. The being appears to be a monster. Victor becomes so obsessed with his creation and then rejects it. Victor is the real monster because of his desire for power, lack of respect for nature, and his stubbornness.
Gender inequality will always affect the way women are portrayed in society, the weaker, unnecessary, and other sex. It is not just a subject of the past, but still holds a name in society, however in the olden eras the way women were treated and are looked at, in a much more harsh condition. In Shakespeare’s Othello and Shelley’s Frankenstein women’s roles in the books are solely based on the way they are treated in their time period. The way women are portrayed in these books, demonstrate that they can never be in the same standing as men, considered the second option, and therefore will never have the same respect as men. In both Othello and Frankenstein women are treated as property, used to better men’s social standards, and lack a voice,
A monster is defined as an imaginary creature that is typically large, ugly, and frightening. By this definition, Victor’s creature who is depicted to be eight feet tall and hideous
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).