Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of racism in America
Effect of apartheid in South Africa
Conclusion of apartheid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of racism in America
The strength of a nation is not established by the force of its military, economic standing, or government, but rather how its citizens are regarded. In order to attain strength, a nation must respect the principle of solidarity; the power of one voice. For without a defined sense of unity, a society is likely to crumble. Unfortunately, as seen throughout history, civilization has often made it their mission to seek out the differences in one another instead of accepting them. This fear of the unknown has led to humankind’s most despicable behavior; the separation of individuals due to their physical attributes. “Racism is mans gravest threat to man...the maximum of hatred for a minimum reason -Abraham Heschel .” Not only has racism allowed unproven ideologies to spread, but it has also lead to the disintegration of civilizations. Sadly, such tragic events have been a prevalent part in the history of Africa. Perhaps, one of the most blatant forms of racism occurred in South Africa, during the period of Apartheid. From 1948 to 1994 non-white Africans were subjected to horrific treatment, enforced by the South African National Party. The repulsive forms of racial segregation in South Africa, resulting from race and color, not only oppressed the colored majority group, but also denied them of any rights or human dignity.
It can be easily stated that the apartheid movement bestowed cruel and unusual punishments upon the people of South Africa, in order to execute its purpose. However, apartheid could have not been carried out if they were not individuals who believed in its principles. In order to understand the National parties ideologies regarding the issue of apartheid, it is essential to acknowledge the history of Boer soc...
... middle of paper ...
...nica. Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/29332/apartheid
Bureau of African Affairs. (2011). Background Note: South Africa. Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2898.html
Charlesworth, M. (1982). Science, non-science & pseudo-science : Bacon, Popper, Lakatos, Kuhn and Feyerabend on defining science. Vic: Deakin University Press
Darwin, C. (2011). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/151902/Charles-Darwin
Deegan, H. (2001). The Politics of the New South Africa: Apartheid and After. England: Longman
John Dugard, Nicholas Haysom and Gilbert Marcus. (1992).The Last Years of Apartheid: Civil Liberties in South Africa. New York: Ford Foundation
Marshall, D. (1987). Apartheid in South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press
Massey, Douglas A. and Nancy A. Denton. American Apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
As the world turns, so do the minds of people who embrace the idea of equality and fairness to all. While society has many ills that prevent its potential growth, racism remains the most prevalent and consistent issue that hurts society’s ability to create unison. From the western to the eastern hemisphere, this ‘ism’ has manifested itself in every aspect of social life; even today, it still marks people’s philosophy and so much so that it influences practices, laws and social action across the world. Although there have been substantial gains in racial equality over the past century, racism still remains a deeply embedded and enduring ideology because of the creation of social divisions that allows power over a certain group of people and
...eems that a much clearer path may lie straight ahead. It does take time for the whole country to push away the idea of no racial segregation, but in time it will happen. The last places to push away racial segregation will be rural areas, as these areas are almost always reluctant to change. South Africa has hit some important milestones in its country's history of racial segregation. The first huge milestone was the abolishment of the apartheid, and then the election of Nelson Mandela, the first black president of South Africa. These important milestones have shown that South Africa is on the right track, but has not met the full standards that Msimangu has set a goal for. Fortunately, there will be a day in the future where this comes true, where white men and black men come together not for their own personal gain, but for the good of the country of South Africa.
When the world develops to date, a country cannot be seen as individual. If a country cannot accept the concept of multiracial society and do not want to unite other countries or nations, it will not develop rapidly and effectively. Nowadays, political integration and economic globalization is the trend. For example, European Communities established in 1967 and became European Union in 1991. There also have a lot of global economic organizations, such as World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organization. Apparently, there still has a large amount of blacks do not get the equal rights. However, the reason why people do not want to give them the same rights is ridiculous. Different color skin, different values, or different religious believes. Even some people just according to themselves imagination or hear the rumor from others. Only a few of people would like to know and experience the blacks? life and hear their opinion about the society. In fact, when the society put down the prejudices and stereotype, all the people are conducive to the society. It will not have differences because of different nations or color skin. At the same time, when people have the equal rights, they will have a stronger responsibility to uphold their society and promote the society?s development. Certainly, when people enjoy the equal rights, the blacks may try to forgive the tough period. ?We are bound up in a delicate network of interdependence because, as we say in our African idiom, a person is a person through other persons??Thus to forgive is indeed the best form of self-interest since anger, resentment, and revenge are corrosive of that summum bonum, that greatest good, communal harmony that enhances the humanity and personhood of all in the community.? (pg. 35) Nevertheless, although the blacks could forgive the cruel history, they should not forget
Leach, Graham. "'Only Free Men can Negotiate' , The struggle for black freedom." In South Africa , No easy path to peace, by Graham Leach, 117. London: Methuen London Limited, 1986.
The End of Apartheid - HistoryWiz South Africa. (n.d.). HistoryWiz: for students, teachers and lovers of history. Retrieved February 19, 2011, from http://www.historywiz.org/end.htm
Msimangu sees the immoral nature of the white society in South Africa: “I see only one hope for our country, and that is when white men and black men, desiring neither power nor money, but desiring only the good of their country, come together to work for it” (71). Paton tells us that to change the attitude toward blacks that good white men and good black men must work together. Both the blacks and whites need to forgive each other and move on together for the sake of South Africa. Both the cultures need to reach peace because “white can live without black, and black without white”(109). Paton explains that society cannot exist without the other. Society must learn to embrace the fellow man and not divide themselves for their own good. For if this trend continues, there will be no blacks living with whites, no jobs, and no money for the whites. Blacks and whites must develop a symbiotic relationship for their cultures to survive.
Source A gives a view on the South African governments control over its people and racial discrimination. It is a biased view and makes the South African government seem cruel and racist. It states that the governments "politics are determined by the colour a persons skin". As this is a statement it gives the impression that it is a fact and by giving this impression it also communicates the idea that the South African government IS racist, rather than the South African government COULD be racist. This comes as no real surprise as the advert has been paid for by the ANC (African National Congress), who are a very anti - South African government organization.
the ban on the ANC, the PAC and the SACP, he announced the release of
During this epoch, 1948-1994, The National Party (NP) government operated under the guise of equal development, equal freedom, and cultural expression. Blacks were forced from their lands, silenced, and treated superior to Whites. Under the leadership of Nelson Mandela, apartheid ended with peaceful resolution and resumed for twenty years. Now, South Africa is repeating history. White farmers are paying the for the near twenty-five-year-old debt with their lives and their land.
Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be considered inferior because of your race? The people of South Africa had to endure racial inferiority during the era of apartheid. The apartheid laws the government of South Africa made led to an unequal lifestyle for the blacks and produced opposition.
In the late late twentieth century, the apartheid in South Africa portrays the reaping benefits of breaking the law for the greater good of the South Africans. After the all-white government came to power in South Africa, the officials began imposing unfair laws upon restricting the majority nonwhites. This lead to the mass revolution through armed and peaceful protests, breaking laws such as the Population Registration Act. This upheaval led to providing more power to the nonwhites and providing more equality between the people, increasing peace relations and making a more stable environment for the next generation. Such outcomes outweigh the infraction of going against the law, proving it justifiable to break the law for the sustainability of the future.
The Role of External Pressure in the Fight Against Apartheid and Minority Rule in South Africa
Old South Africa is best described by Mark Uhlig, “The seeds of such violent conflict in South Africa were sown more than 300 years ago, with the first meetings of white settlers and indigenous black tribes in an unequal relationship that was destined one day to become unsustainable” (116).
on him or her. Unless it was stamped on their pass, they were not allowed to