On the other hand, the Chief, in “The Laughing Man”, experiences a situation in which his hopes slowly died and, in turn, changed into a never-ending path of despair, much like Seymour and Sergeant X. His hopes, in this case, are set within his girlfriend, Mary Hudson (95). Despite having a god-like effect on the children, the Chief is nothing more than a skinny law-student, and must create a fictional in order to compensate for his love-less life. This is exemplified when the narrator states, “his hair-line extremely low, his nose was large and fleshy, and his torso was just about as long as his legs were”, implying that he was less than fortunate when it came to girls (85). However, once Mary Hudson is introduced, she changes the Chief by …show more content…
restoring his hope in finally finding true love as well as feeling accepted by others, not just the kids. Hudson, who is described as a college student from Wellesley College and a resident of Long Island, a wealthy area of New York City, has no reason to stay with the Chief, an unappealing law student at NYU. As such, she has high expectations and expects them to be completed on command, to which the Chief, nervously, obeys. This is shown when Hudson is first shown to the kids on the bus, “A trifle wildly, he looked at the Comanches near his seat and signaled the row to give way” (95). Furthermore, the Chief allows her to play baseball with the Comanches, a sport they believe is reserved only for men (96). However, regardless of her charismatic attitude and beautiful aspects, the Chief realizes that she is controlling his life in almost all aspects, swearing at the kids, changing the entire structure of the bus, who is described as a mens-only bus, and his personality. This is shown as part of an installment of the Laughing Man, when the Dufarges capture the Laughing Man, and force him to exchange his freedom for that of another (100). As such, the hope that once was, is now lost to the controlling behavior of Mary Hudson. Reality catches up with the Chief, and soon notices that the love that once existed between them was only one-sided. This is shown in the meeting that Mary Hudson and the Chief had at the field, for the last time, which results in Mary Hudson running away from the Chief (106). On a similar tangent, within the storyline of the Laughing Man, he eventually kills the Dufarges by regurgitating all the bullets (108). However, he is still tied up to the tree, far away from his comrades, and cut off from his supply of eagle blood. Eventually, he dies at his favorite companion, Omba’s, feet (110). The storyline reflects the ups and downs of the Chief’s life, and, more importantly, the cycle of hope. The death of the Laughing Man signifies the death of the Chief’s hopes within himself and to ever find love elsewhere. He, like Sergeant X acknowledges the despair that plagues their lives, and chooses to confront it. The Chief knows that he missed his one chance to find love, but still manages to continue on, signifying the release of old memories. In a similar pattern, the hopes of Eloise, the protagonist in “Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut”, is set on the love that once existed between her and Walt Glass. While reminiscing past events with her friend, Mary Jane, Eloise exhibits great care and respect for Walt, as if he still alive. She goes on to state, “He was the only boy I ever knew that could make me laugh. I mean really laugh” (41) and even states that “he didn’t even try to be funny – he just was funny” (42). It becomes evident that Walt was Eloise’s true love, not Lew, who she describes as humorless, inattentive, and unintelligent. Her anger towards Lew is reflected upon Ramona, her mentally instable daughter. Ramona is physical appearance is described as almost identical to that of her father, thus allowing Eloise to release part of her anger towards her daughter (35). However, despite having such high hopes that Walt will someday return, she only wants the charismatic and charming Walt that she met, not the incapable Walt that died. This is reflected as a secret Eloise kept, without revealing it to anyone, especially her husband. During her conversation with Mary Jane, she states, “it [the stove] was all full of gasoline and junk and it exploded in their faces. The other boy just lost an eye” (48). A soldier who is reported to have died in combat, one would assume, died a hero’s death; fighting until his last breath for his brothers-in-arms. Dying from an exploding stove is certainly not what Eloise was expecting nor what she had hoped for. Nevertheless, she finally addresses this problem during her encounter with Ramona, who “was sleeping far over on one side of the bed…” (54). While commanding Ramona to sleep in the center of her bed, Eloise realizes that she not so different than her daughter. Both are imaging boys who are never going to solve any of their problems. This is show when Ramona admits to having another imaginary boyfriend, Mickey Mickeranno to which her mother responds, “Eloise raised her voice to a shriek. ‘You get in the center of that bed. Go on.’ ” (54). By forcing Ramona to sleep in the center, Eloise acknowledges her destructive attributes as well as preserving hopes that do not exist. It becomes clear that she cannot face reality alone, since it is too harsh for her to bear, as well as confronting it at any point, but realizes that it is there. Essentially, Eloise knows her hopes of someday living a happy life died in the explosion, and is too afraid to deal with it. Similarly, the protagonist in “De Daumier-Smith’s Blue Period”, who is referred to as Jean de Daumier-Smith, has his many hopes destroyed by false assumptions and unrealistic hopes.
After sending a false resume to Les Amis des Vieux Maîtres, a Canadian art institute, to apply as a teacher, de Daumier-Smith realizes that the art institute that he had hoped for was in fact an institute run out of the headmaster’s apartment in the rundown section of Montreal (213). This revelation signals the first of many hopes that will soon be destroyed throughout the story. Along with staying in the Verdun section of Montreal, and enduring two loathsome hosts, de Daumier-Smith must also teach two students who he considers are artistically incompetent (225). Initially, de Daumier-Smith considered the art institute to be of prestige and highly selective, since the ad stated it was, “the newest, most progressive, correspondence art school in Canada” and the directeur formally attended “the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts, Tokyo” (203,204). His hopes of instructing highly skilled artists blinded de Daumier-Smith to see beyond the attractive title of the advertisement. Once he realized that his students are novices to the subject, his hopes of instructing future prodigies and geniuses disappears. Nevertheless, the biggest loss of hope is not being able to speak with Sister Irma, indefinitely, and seeing true potential going to waste. After reading Sister Irma’s questionnaire and examining her works, de Daumier-Smith recognizes her true potential as an artist mentioning, “After thirteen years, I not only distinctly remember all six of Sister Irma’s samples, but four of them I sometimes think I remember a trifle too distinctly…” (227). However, regardless of how much de Daumier-Smith wanted to visit Sister Irma as well as perfect her talent, he is dumbstruck and driven with grief when he is notified that Sister Irma will not be studying at Les Amis Des Vieux Maîtres (242). This shown in
his rash decision to send his students letters stating that their artistic abilities were subpar and trying to perfect them is futile (243). Reality finally caught up with de Daumier-Smith and it plunges him into a state of mild depression, causing him to drink his sorrows away. Nevertheless, after having his mystical experience in the orthopedic shop, he realizes that his problem lies within his restriction of Sister Irma. He soon writes, “I am giving Sister Irma her freedom to follow her own destiny. Everybody is a nun” (251). Ultimately, this is de Daumier-Smith’s way of dealing with his destroyed hopes and reality. Essentially, he chooses to progress further with his life and let go of past hopes and despairs.
Although modern science has allowed us to develop many complex medicines, laughter is still the strongest one available in the real world and in the book. Laughter proves to be a strong medicine in more ways than one and is completely free, allowing anyone to use it at anytime. It allows us to connect socially with people, it can be used as a way of overthrowing power, and it is good for your health. As Randle McMurphy showed in the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, laughter can lighten the mood in the darkest situations.
When Mcmurphy comes into the ward his laughing was making people uneasy. This showed how far away the patients were from reality. The chief says (22) “I see he is making every body over their uneasy, with all his kidding and joking.” Then right after he starts connecting to the patients and the Acutes actually show some sign of a smile (23) “The Acutes are grinning now not so uneasy any more glad that something out of the ordinary is happening.” Only after 8 pages there is progress already seen in the patients with laughter.
People one can never really tell how person is feeling or what their situation is behind closed doors or behind the façade of the life they lead. Two masterly crafted literary works present readers with characters that have two similar but very different stories that end in the same result. In Herman Melville’s story “Bartleby the Scrivener” readers are presented with Bartleby, an interesting and minimally deep character. In comparison to Gail Godwin’s work, “A Sorrowful Woman” we are presented with a nameless woman with a similar physiological state as Bartleby whom expresses her feelings of dissatisfaction of her life. Here, a deeper examination of these characters their situations and their ultimate fate will be pursued and delved into for a deeper understanding of the choice death for these characters.
First, there is the setting of a strict military like boarding school where the students, all females, are craving the love and affection that they are missing from their family. One particular student, Manuela von Meinhardis, had just recently joined the school after the recent death of her mother. She is particularly vulnerable to the love and care that is provided by the only caring teacher in the school, Fraulein von Bernburg.
Mademoiselle Reisz states to Edna that in order to be considered an artist, "one must possess many gifts-absolute gifts-which have not been acquired by one’s own effort. And, moreover, to succeed, the artist must possess the courageous soul." (63) Although Edna and Mademoiselle share many characteristics that may possibly contribute to their future paths, they have one stifling difference; Mademoiselle Reisz possesses the wisdom to live the way that she does, Edna Pontellier does not.
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
Edna seeks occupational freedom in art, but lacks sufficient courage to become a true artist. As Edna awakens to her selfhood and sensuality, she also awakens to art. Originally, Edna “dabbled” with sketching “in an unprofessional way” (Chopin 543). She could only imitate, although poorly (Dyer 89). She attempts to sketch Adèle Ratignolle, but the picture “bore no resemblance” to its subject. After her awakening experience in Grand Isle, Edna begins to view her art as an occupation (Dyer 85). She tells Mademoiselle Reisz that she is “becoming an artist” (Chopin 584). Women traditionally viewed art as a hobby, but to Edna, it was much more important than that. Painting symbolizes Edna’s independence; through art, she breaks free from her society’s mold.
Everyone says, everywhere you go, that everything is about sex. Wars and films were no different. The “screwball comedy” was a movie making style popular in the 1940’s. This style was created so filmmakers could put more risqué moments in their films while still abiding by the censorship laws. These movies were “sex comedies without the sex” (Andrew Sarria, film critic discussing screwball comedies). Stanley Kubrick used this idea to fuel a satire about the idealistic Cold War in 1964 to supposedly fight communism. Dr. Strangelove debunks the myth of American moral superiority through the constant sexual undertones and over masculinity throughout the film and instead portrays the Cold War as groups of testosterone fueled, sex driven men compensating for inferiority complexes.
Laughter is an interesting topic. Mainly because of the lack of thought that goes with it as to why we laugh. In an article titled Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic by Henri Bergson, the theory behind why things are funny is explored. He mentions many different things in his article pertaining to the comic, however, there are a few that stand out more than others. He talks directly about the fact that things are only funny if they relate to humans. Then he touches on the idea that accidents are funnier than planned events. Finally, he speaks on laughter being directly related to social setting. The 1992 film Noises Off is a perfect demonstration of everything that Bergson writes about. Henri Bergson’s essay on laughter is perfectly supported by the film Noises Off.
The multi-talented Camille Billops has found many different ways to express her artistic ability throughout her career. Her works that were done throughout her career was an expression of her life. Throughout the life of Camille she had many influences leading her into the art world. This paper has the artist going through her life coming up through the world as a student to a teacher then artist, and her works making her a legend. The way she met her husband and worked together to make the Hatch-Billops Collection. In her time as an artist she changed her work a few times. She started doing printmaking then changed to sculpture and film making. Throughout her life is what made her films. The trilogy of films makes her life public for everyone to see. From Suzanne Suzanne to Finding Christa and then to String of Pearls. Camille Billops is an artist representing her culture through her works of printmaking, sculpture and film. She has made her mark in history by doing so. Because of this she will always be remembered.
Smith, Fran. “Why Arts Education Is Crucial, and Who’s Doing It Best.” Edutopia.org. The George
Owen wants his readers to think about the harsh conditions of war, and understanding the tragedy and sad emotions of soldiers who wouldn’t get the last laugh since many of them die. To reference the title of the poem, Wilfred describes the weapons getting the last laugh at the end of each stanza. In “The Last Laugh,” Owen identifies the way in which the weapons have more power versus religion, family, and love. According to line 3, “The Bullets chirped -- In vain, vain, vain!,” the bullets are mocking his religion. The weapons might have hit the soldier to make him curse at God and be in vain. Therefore, the soldier would be punished and the weapons would laugh at him. In line 4, “Machine guns chuckled -- Tut-tut! Tut-tut!,” the sound that
The movie, “Mona Lisa Smile” is an inspirational film that explores life through feminism, marriage, and education lead by a modernist teacher at the end of a traditional era. It begins by introducing the lead character, Katherine Watson (Julia Roberts), a liberal-minded novice professor from California, who lands a job in the art history department at a snobbish, all-girl college, called Wellesley, in the fall of 1953. Despite warnings from her boyfriend Paul that a Boston Brahmin environment was out of her element, Katherine was thrilled at the prospect of educating some of the brightest young women in the country however, her image of Wellesley quickly fizzles after her first day of class, in which, was more like a baptism by fire. Her smug students flaunted their exhaustive knowledge of the text and humiliated her in front of a supervisor. However, Katherine, determined not to buckle under pressure, departs from the syllabus in order to regain the upper hand. She quickly challenged the girls’ idea of what constituted art and exposed them to modern artist not endorsed by the school board. She dared them to think for themselves, and explore outside of their traditional views. This form of art was unacceptable by the students at first however, overtime Katherine penetrated her student’s distain and earned their esteem.
Throughout the history, women were considered below men. Then it led to believe that only men can write but not women. However, women managed to enter literature world like men did. However, most people believed that only writing style that exists in literature is men’s style not feminine. Almost to the point, people believed that there is no feminine style of writing. Helene Cixous is a writer of The Laugh of The Medusa. This book is about women’s writing from Cixous’s view and explanation of feminine writing. Cixous believed women should write their own style in order to break and destroy male dominated society.
Laughter therapy started in the 1970s and is a non-invasive, complementary and alternative therapy (Cousins,1976) Laughter therapy, which uses humour to improve quality of life, decrease pain, reduce stress and has become a therapy trend according to recent studies (Weiss,2002;Balick&Lee,2003;Bennett,Zeller,Rosenberg,&McCann.2003 MacDonald,2004;) The merits of this therapy are that it is easy to recommend and does not cause contrary effects with respect to side effects dose, allergies, and (Strean,2009) Around the world, there are several laughter therapy clinics operated with the purpose of emancipating anti-stress and increasing happiness by practicing laughter,( Ghodsbin, Ahmadi, Jahanbin,