Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and roles of women in literature
Gender and roles of women in literature
Gender roles related to literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender and roles of women in literature
Throughout the history, women were considered below men. Then it led to believe that only men can write but not women. However, women managed to enter literature world like men did. However, most people believed that only writing style that exists in literature is men’s style not feminine. Almost to the point, people believed that there is no feminine style of writing. Helene Cixous is a writer of The Laugh of The Medusa. This book is about women’s writing from Cixous’s view and explanation of feminine writing. Cixous believed women should write their own style in order to break and destroy male dominated society. Cixous supported the idea of feminine style of writing. Also, key theme of The Laugh of The Medusa is about breaking rule of writing. Cixious said, “what I say has at least two sides and two aims: to break up, to destroy; and to foresee the unforeseeable, to project.” (Cixous, 27) This showed what kind of view that Cixous had. She believed that feminine writing is about breaking rules that was existed in …show more content…
literature. Also, Cixious mentions, “I shall speak about women’s writing: what it will do. Women must write her self: must write about women bring women to writing.” (Cixious, 27) This means that Cixous was aware that women were excluded in writing and most of writing style was considered as masculine not feminine. Also, when she means by break up and destroy, this means women’s writing requires breaking of rule of masculine writing. In the world of literature, masculine writing style is dominant style then it lead to extinct of feminine writing style. Female writers existed, but they only wrote in masculine style to fit in, instead of writing in feminine style. Cixous was aware of struggles that female writers had to go through. According to Cixous, “When I say “woman,” I’m speaking of woman in her inevitable struggle against conventional man.” (Cixous, 27) However, Cixous believed that female writers must write for themselves instead of just to fit in the male dominated society. In addition, Cixous believed that destruction of rules in writing is necessary for women to establish their own writing style.
Cixous believed that writing is a powerful tool that women could possess in order to destroy oppression that women faced. Also, she was strongly expressed that writing is the way to set women free from oppression. Cixous says, “Writing is for you, you are for you. I know why you haven’t written. Because writing is at once too high too great, too great for you, it’s reserved for great men.” (Cixous, 29) This showed that what kind of view that Cixous had about women’s writing. Cixous saw women didn’t realized what kind of power that writing has. Cixous considered writing as unstoppable tool that women could have. Cixous mentions, “Write, let no one hold you back, let nothing stops you: not man.” (Cixous, 29) This passage showed Cixous thinks writing is one way to destroy any kind of oppression and obstacle that women
have. Medusa is a metaphor Cixous used. Medusa is a mythical creature that has a power to turn anybody into stone, if anyone looks directly to its eye. Cixous used Medusa to describe what kind of fear that men actually have toward women. Cixous describes, “Men say that there are two unpresentable things: death and feminine sex.” (Cixous, 38) This means that Cixous believed men are terrified about women and their sexuality. Just like Medusa, if men ever look directly on women and their sexuality, they believed that will end their life. Then Cixous wanted to point out that women were oppressed because men were afraid of them. In conclusion, Cixous believed that writing is a powerful tool to use to break and destroy male dominated world. Also, Cixous believed that the reason male was trying to be dominant, because they were insecure and uncertain about women.
Contreras’s writings exhibited issues that were of great concern to women. She explored single parenthood, violence, both physical a psychological against women, lesbianism, and growing old. On the contrary, she used her stories to depict the weakness of men. Her writings included sterility, jealousy, and homosexuality amongst the male sex. Her stories revealed a distinctive concern for emotions and psychological motivation. Emotions such as terror that many women are exposed to in their relations with men are prevalent in her literary works.
By educating herself she was able to form her own opinion and no longer be ignorant to the problem of how women are judge by their appearance in Western cultures. By posing the rhetorical question “what is more liberating” (Ridley 448), she is able to get her readers to see what she has discovered. Cisneros also learned that despite the fact that she did not take the path that her father desired, he was still proud of all of her accomplishments. After reading her work for the first time her father asked “where can I get more copies” (Cisneros 369), showing her that he wanted to show others and brag about his only daughters accomplishments. Tan shifts tones throughout the paper but ends with a straightforward tone saying “there are still plenty of other books on the shelf. Choose what you like” (Tan 4), she explains that as a reader an individual has the right to form their own opinion of her writing but if they do not like it they do not have to read it because she writes for her own pleasure and no one else’s. All of the women took separate approaches to dealing with their issues but all of these resolutions allowed them to see the positive side of the
...perceived. Therefore, she uses her writing to give women a voice and to speak out against the unfairness they endure. As a result, Cisneros’ story “Woman Hollering Creek” demonstrates a distinction between the life women dream of and the life they often have in reality.
Over the course of time, the roles of men and women have changed dramatically. As women have increasingly gained more social recognition, they have also earned more significant roles in society. This change is clearly reflected in many works of literature, one of the most representative of which is Plautus's 191 B.C. drama Pseudolus, in which we meet the prostitute Phoenicium. Although the motivation behind nearly every action in the play, she is glimpsed only briefly, never speaks directly, and earns little respect from the male characters surrounding her, a situation that roughly parallels a woman's role in Roman society of that period. Women of the time, in other words, were to be seen and not heard. Their sole purpose was to please or to benefit men. As time passed, though, women earned more responsibility, allowing them to become stronger and hold more influence. The women who inspired Lope de Vega's early seventeenth-century drama Fuente Ovejuna, for instance, rose up against not only the male officials of their tiny village, but the cruel (male) dictator busy oppressing so much of Spain as a whole. The roles women play in literature have evolved correspondingly, and, by comparing The Epic of Gilgamesh, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and The Wife of Bath's Prologue, we can see that fictional women have just as increasingly as their real-word counterparts used gender differences as weapons against men.
Eupriedes, Medea and Sappho’s writing focus on women to expose the relationships between a variety of themes and the general ideal that women are property. The main characters in both pieces of literature demonstrate similar situations where love and sex result in a serious troll. These themes affected their relationship with themselves and others, as well as, incapability to make decisions which even today in society still affects humans. Headstrong actions made on their conquest for everlasting love connects to sacrifices they made to achieve their goal which ultimately ended in pain. Love and sex interferes with development of human emotions and character throughout the course
Throughout history, women have struggled with, and fought against, oppression. They have been held back and weighed down by the sexist ideas of a male dominated society which has controlled cultural, economic and political ideas and structures. During the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s women became more vocal and rebuked sexism and the role that had been defined for them. Fighting with the powerful written word, women sought a voice, equality amongst men and an identity outside of their family. In many literary writings, especially by women, during the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s, we see symbols of oppression and the search for gender equality in society.
Euripides shows his views on female power through Medea. As a writer of the marginalized in society, Medea is the prime example of minorities of the age. She is a single mother, with 2 illegitimate children, in a foreign place. Despite all these disadvantages, Medea is the cleverest character in the story. Medea is a warning to the consequences that follow when society underestimates the
conceptualizations of gender in literature are situated in a culture and historical context ; the
This essay explores the role of women in Homer's Odyssey, James Joyce's Ulysses (1922) and Derrick Walcott's Omeros (1990), epics written in very different historical periods. Common to all three epics are women as the transforming figure in a man's life, both in the capacity of a harlot and as wife.
There is no doubt that the literary written by men and women is different. One source of difference is the sex. A woman is born a woman in the same sense as a man is born a man. Certainly one source of difference is biological, by virtue of which we are male and female. “A woman´s writing is always femenine” says Virginia Woolf
This creates a despair, of hopelessness and of downheartedness. The woman, on multiple occasions, wrote down, “And what can one do?” This lets the reader know that women as a whole were very oppressed in ...
In conclusion, the poem “Medusa” challenges subordinate traits of women. Duffy strips both the female protagonist and the male character of their names and titles in the poem thereby making them equal. She also illustrates women as domineering shown by the defeat of the male personae. This is Duffy conveying the fact that women are as valued as men regardless of stereotypical attributes and concepts of society.
Gilbert, Sarah M. and Gubar, Susan. "From the Infection in the Sentence: The Woman Writer and the Anxiety of Authorship." The Critical Condition: Classic Texts andContemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 1361-74.
Cixous, Helene. "Laugh of the Medusa." Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory And Criticism. Ed. Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1991.
Women were often subjects of intense focus in ancient literary works. In Sarah Pomeroy’s introduction of her text Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves, she writes, “Women pervade nearly every genre of classical literature, yet often the bias of the author distorts the information” (x). It is evident in literature that the social roles of women were more restricted than the roles of men. And since the majority of early literature was written by men, misogyny tends to taint much of it. The female characters are usually given negative traits of deception, temptation, selfishness, and seduction. Women were controlled, contained, and exploited. In early literature, women are seen as objects of possession, forces deadly to men, cunning, passive, shameful, and often less honorable than men. Literature reflects the societal beliefs and attitudes of an era and the consistency of these beliefs and attitudes toward women and the roles women play has endured through the centuries in literature. Women begin at a disadvantage according to these societal definitions. In a world run by competing men, women were viewed as property—prizes of contests, booty of battle and the more power men had over these possessions the more prestigious the man. When reading ancient literature one finds that women are often not only prizes, but they were responsible for luring or seducing men into damnation by using their feminine traits.