Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary devices in two kinds
Literary devices essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary devices in two kinds
1. What is the significance of the title? The title of the book is straightforward and literal. It is all about how Ivan Denisovich Shukhov survives a single day as a prisoner in a Siberian labour camp.
The title clues us into how the story is structured - one day, 24 hours. That’s an apt comparison, since the book follows Ivan Denisovich Shukhov over the course of exactly one day, “from the first clang of the rail to the last clang of the rail.” (Solzhenitsyn 167). The reader can take Ivan Denisovich’s day as a really special and unusual one, but also as a day that is very typical and is a lot like all the other days Ivan has spent in prison. The day is both average and stange, and this combo may be why we’re hearing about it. We also learn our main character’s name from the title, Ivan Denisovich. When you start reading the book, you end up hearing a ton about a man named Shukkov, which is actually Ivan’s last name. In the prison camp, most of the guys refer to each other by their last names, sort of like a nickname. So, since this story is a personal story of Ivan Denisovich Shukkov, the title refers to him by his first name, his actual name, and not any sort of nickname or more distanced form of address
…show more content…
What is the function of the setting? The setting is in the gulag system in the Stalin-run Soviet Union. The gulag prison system is a whole world unto itself, like a hidden universe with its own rules, languages, people, and places. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is consisted primarily of socialist realist literature designed to serve as Communist propaganda, through optimistic and positive depictions of workers’ contentment on collective farms and in government factories. The novel described the abuses of Stalin’s prison camp system through the way Shukkov is abused in the Siberian
After the assassination of Alexander the Great in 1881 by Russian socialist revolutionaries, Alexander III ascended to the throne and began to develop a reactionary policy that would be used to suppress the power of anti-tsarist rivals (Kort 23). In the late 1800s, Tsar Alexander III was faced with growing insurrection from the populist peasants, who were demanding more freedoms and land under the Tsarist regime. However, he was unwilling to give up his traditional centralized authority for a more democratic system of ruling. Instead, he sought political guidance from his advisor, Konstantin Pobedonostsev, an Orthodox religious conservative and loyal member of the Russian autocracy. Pobedonostsev was quick to hound revolutionaries by means
Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon depicts the fallacious logic of a totalitarian regime through the experiences of Nicolas Salmanovitch Rubashov. Rubashov had fought in the revolution and was once part of the Central Committee of the Party, but he is arrested on charges of instigating attempted assassinations of No. 1, and for taking part in oppositional, counter-revolutionary activities, and is sent to a Soviet prison. Rubashov, in his idle pacing throughout his cell, recollects his past with the Party. He begins to feel impulses of guilt, most especially in those moments he was required to expel devoted revolutionaries from the Party, sending them to their death. These subconscious feelings of guilt are oftentimes represented physically in the form of toothache or through day- or night-dreams. As his thought progresses with the novel, he begins to recognize his guilt, which emerges alongside his individuality. It remains in his subconscious, and it is not until Rubashov absolves himself through silent resignation at his public trial that he is fully conscious of guilt. By joining the Party, Rubashov allows himself to forget the questions of human nature and of his individuality. The nature of his guilt lies in this betrayal of his individuality.
The book, Night, is a story following a Jew living in Auschwitz during World War II. The book title is a metaphor for how the holocaust felt to him.
One day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is not a book about a superhuman. It is not a story about someone who is weaker and more desperate than everyone else. It is not a tale of greatness, nor is it about extraordinary faults. Instead, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn chose to center his story around Ivan denisovich Shukhov, an average, unnoticeable Russian prisoner.
This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.
Bardach, Janusz, and Kathleen Gleeson. Man Is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1998. Print.
Solzhenitsyn believed that it was nearly impossible to have truly free thoughts under the prison camp conditions described in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, or in any situation where there is an authoritarian ruler. In a pris...
Political prisoners and criminals alike were subject to brutal conditions in the Soviet gulags at Kolyma in the 20th century. In Varlam Shalamov’s Kolyma Tales, the stories of many different prisoners are told and much is revealed about how humans react under these pressures, both naturally and socially. Being in an extreme environment not only takes a toll on one’s physical well-being, but on one’s mental and emotional state as well. The stories show that humans can be reduced to a fragile, animalistic state while in the Kolyma work camps because the extreme conditions force many men to focus solely on self-preservation.
In the late 1930’s while the United States was going through The Great Depression the Soviet Union was going through its own turbulent times. This would be known as the Moscow Show Trials, which took place under the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. The book Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler takes place during this time period. The main character Nicholas Rubashov has been imprisoned even though he always has been loyal to the goals of the party (Koestler). This showed a shift that was happening in the country and an attempt by Stalin to eliminate any possible opposition even if they were heroes in the revolution. In the text two different concepts come to light vivisection morality where the party comes before the individual and anti-vivisection morality where the individual is sacred. Rubashov in the beginning does not embrace individualism however throughout the novel he begins to adopt individualism that he refers to as grammatical fiction. Vivisection morality is never a justifiable political system. Suppressing the rights of human beings is not only inhumane but also counter productive in creating an effective and wealthy society.
The way Sergei’s character shows he is altruistic and caring when he uses the two wishes on others than himself. At one point in the story, Sergei shows those character traits when he uses up his first wish of his sister with cancer “That first wish, Sergei used up when they discovered a cancer in his sister. A lung cancer, the kind you don’t get better from”(Keret 7). An analysis of this quote reveals that in the past, he would give up his first wish on his family for her to survive from cancer. After utilizing the wish, the goldfish cures his sister before Sergei could say anything to him when he found out. According to the author, the usage of the second wish was for Svet’s boy five years ago when he was the age of three with a mind that
Ivan the Terrible was born on 25 August 1530. He was born in Kolomenskoye, Russia. Ivan was the son of Vasili 3rd and his second wife, Elena Glinskaya. Ivan was three years old when his father died from a boil and inflammation on his leg which developed into blood poisoning. He father request was for his son Ivan to be proclaimed the Grand Prince of Moscow. When Ivan was eight years his mother Elena Glinskaya died for poison. His letter said him and his young brother Yuri felt neglected and offended. On 16 January 1547 he was crowned Maonomakh’s Cap at the Cathedral of the Dormition at the age of 16. Ivan was the first the first person to be crowned as Tsar of All the Russias. As being crowned he had a message to send to the world and to Russia his message was that he is the only one supreme ruler of the country. “ The new title symbolized an assumption of powers equivalent and parallel to those held by former Byzantine Emperor and the Tatar Khan, both known in Russian sources as Tsar. The political effect was to elevate Ivan’s position.”
In conclusion, the title Night makes this book better because it is one word but can be analyzed both figuratively and literally. This title holds so much meaning to the sufferers of concentration camps… their lives were endless torture, endless fear of the unknown, a nightmare.
In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Solzhenitsyn uses small details and Shukhov’s mealtime rituals to demonstrate his small, personal bids for independence. When Shukov sits down for breakfast, one of the first things he does is remove his hat, for “he could never bring himself to eat with his hat on” (14). Nobody is telling Shukov what to do in this moment. By removing his hat to satisfy his own desire, he is gaining control of one small aspect of his morning routine and bringing himself incrementally closer to independence. Shukhov's spoon is another example of his desire to make his own decisions. The spoon is clearly one of Shukov’s few prized possessions. This is likely due to its origins. As Shukov sits down for breakfast, he pulls
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich focuses on totalitarian oppression and camp survival. The Gulag was a correct labor camp and settlement which almost entirely stripped the prisoners’ identity and dignity. The food rations were scarce among the prisoners, and the inadequate clothing and uninsulated housing were barbarous acts committed by this system. Various efforts to completely dehumanize the prisoners are articulated in this novel. While most of the prisoners were victims of dehumanization, Shukov and Alyosha were still able to preserve their identity, dignity, and humanity.
xvi Solzhenitsyn, A. I. The Gulag Archipelago, (I-II). Translated by Thomas P. Whitney. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1973, 436.