Screenwriters alter an author’s original work, because some think that people will be more drawn to watch their movie. “The Landlady by Roald Dahl, and the series, “Tales of the Unexpected,” have many similarities and differences. Many parts of the book are compared and contrasted throughout the movie.
“The landlady,” by Roald Dahl and “The Tales of the unexpected have many similarities. The first similarity is that the landlady in both versions of the story stuff her deceased animals. In the short story version, she stuffs many of her animals such as a dog and a parrot. Similar to the story, the movie also shows that the landlady stuff both her dead dog and parrot. Im sure screenwriters kept this part of the story the same because they didn’t want to get rid of too many details. The next similarity of
…show more content…
the short story and movie is the tea tasting like almonds. In the short story the main character Billy directly says, “The tea tasted faintly of bitter almonds, and he didn’t much care for it.” In the movie Billy faints because drinking tea. The tea in the movie and the short story both tasted like almonds because it was poisoned. The screenwriter keeps this consistent in the movie because it is a very important part to the story, and it cannot be missed. There are many similarities to the two versions of the story, but there are also many differences. Besides the similarities of the story and movie, there are also many differences.
The first difference of the story was that billy never died in the short story, while in the movie he did. The last thing Billy said was, “Excuse my asking, but haven’t there been any other guests here except them in the last two or three years?” After that, the landlady answers him and that's where the story leaves off. There is no explanation, on whether or not Billy dies in the short story. In the movie though, it clearly shows that Billy has died from drinking the tea, and the landlady will stuff him. The screenwriter alters the plot from the author's short story because the screenwriter thinks that if they add more to the movie, it will be more interesting. Another difference from the story and the movie is that in the movie the landlady suffocates Billy. When Billy starts to dye the landlady closes the window and locks the doors so he can’t escape and will die right on his bed. In the story Billy was never sent to die in a room, or the window of his room wasn’t even closed. I think the screenwriters changed this because they wanted the audience to be more interested in the
movie. Both versions of The Landlady, whether it be the book or the movie, has many similarities and differences. Overall, I prefer the movie better because it gave me a better understanding of the book with more details. In conclusion, both stories have a landlady who vacillates young men.
The important similarities, such as how Billy saved up for and bought the dogs, the way he chopped down a giant sycamore to fulfill a promise to his dogs, and the red fern that had grown on the dogs’ graves, are all there, showing that the movie producers read the novel before they started producing it. However, the lack of an Old Billy, an actual win, and Ann’s almost death shows that the analysis of the book wasn’t quite complete when they started filming. As a result, most of the book was better than the movie, as the attachment to the characters was greater due to the scenes that were in the book, but not in the movie. The only part of the movie that was redeeming was the lack of the “first chapter,” when Old Billy gave away the win in the novel. Since that part of the plot was not in the film, it kept the victor of the competition a mystery, and therefore keeps the suspense there during the hunt. The book is one of the most tear jerking I’ve ever read, but the movie seems very distant and
Sometimes in movie production a film is developed from a piece of literature. Directors will use the plot of a book either to create a unique movie, or to give the audience a chance to see what their favorite book is like when acted out on the screen. Willa Cather's "Paul's Case" is a good example of a work adapted to video. The movie has slight differences from the book, but the director Lamont Johnson follows the original closely.
When the author first introduces you to the women running the Bed and Breakfast place, she was very good at putting up a front and being very welcoming to Billy. This story is similar to what your parents might say, never go into a person’s house if you don’t know them. In this short story the author is the narrator of the story. In “The Landlady” there is a lot of foreshadowing, which is giving you a quick preview of what is coming next in the story.
Each version also has the main characters boarding up the windows. Anyone who thought the birds won’t attack are usually found dead, but in the movie they are found with their eyes pecked out. Also, both the story and the movie have REALLY bad endings! They aren’t very similar, but they both leave you hanging. When you see a movie or read a book you want to know what happens to the main characters. In these two, you didn’t get an ending. They left you hanging and for some people that ruins it all.
Some authors use suspense to make their readers more intrigued and to create a feeling of wanting to know more. In “The Landlady” by Roald Dahl, Billy Weaver is looking for a place to spend the night and finds himself in front of a bed and breakfast. However, the Landlady, owner of the bed and breakfast, is a murderer. However in “A Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, the narrator originally wants to kill the old man because of his eye the beat of the old man's heart is what drives the narrator over the edge. But, the police came and the guilt and the sound of his own heartbeat made the narrator confess to killing the old man. Therefore suspense is depicted in both Roald Dahl’s short story, “The Landlady” and Edgar Allan Poe’s short story, “A Tell-Tale Heart” through the use of tone and character development.
The film The Birds, was directed by Alfred Hitchcock and loosely based on the short story, "The Birds" by Daphne Du Murrier. Like most films that portray a book on a screen, there are techniques used to draw the viewer that differ from the short story. The main audience of these two stories are provoked into emotional state of fear and fantasy that helps both versions complete their goal of creating a suspenseful plot. In this paper, I will compare and contrast the major differences and similarities between the short story and movie by addressing the unique film techniques, the interesting characters, and the overall theme.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
In the novel, The House on Mango Street, Sandra Cisneros describes the problems that Latino women face in a society that treats them as second class citizens. A society that is dominated by men, and a society that values women for what they look like, and not for what is on inside. In her Novel Cisneros wants us to envision the obstacles that Latino women must face everyday in order to be treated equally.
...erican classic. Most children know the story of “The Wizard of Oz”. Dorothy is a positive influence. She shows kindness, respect, and heroines. This story has been told in many different ways. The movie and the book versions are somewhat similar, but the Michael Jackson version is very different. The witches have different names except Glinda but she is known as the good Witch of the South instead of the good Witch of the North. It also takes place in Harlem, New York and has an all-African American cast. Overall the basic plots of the different versions are the same, but the way they are told are somewhat different.
It is clear that the author, Roald Dahl, utilizes a variety of literary devices in order to create an element of suspense in the text, “The Landlady.” An example of this would be Dahl’s use of foreshadowing in the text. The Landlady states in the text, “But my dear boy, he never left. He’s still here. Mr. Temple is also here. They’re on the fourth floor, both of them together” (Dahl 5). It is evident how this would contribute to the component of suspense for the reader. The use of foreshadowing throughout “The Landlady” is meant to hint towards Billy’s impending doom, and thus would compel readers to anticipate Billy’s fate, creating suspense. Foreshadowing contributes a great deal to the dark humor/mysterious aspect of Dahl’s style of writing.
These two films are not only similar on these surface levels, but also in their narrative structure and intent as well. Dorothy and Alice, both find themselves trapped in a world of their own fantasy, but with no context on how to navigate their way home. They are then lead by an array of strange characters who guide them on their journey. Dorothy meets the scarecrow, the tin man, the cowardly lion, and so on. While Alice crosses paths with the white rabbit, the cheshire cat, the mad hatter, and so on. With the assistance of their companions, both heroines maneuver their way through the challenges each fantasy presents. Perhaps the biggest similarity these films share narratively, is the underlying emphasis on empathy and perspective. Both
The name of this story is The Landlady and it is by Roald Dahl. In this story there is a lot of fascinating things where there is things that are just to good to be true. In this story, things will seem to be nice and cosy. Roald Dahl creates a sense of foreboding by making the Landlady seem too nice and very creepy. Billy Weaver doesn't know whats coming to him.
Comparing the two tales to each other I’ve also notice an abundance of differences that the director of the film adaption added for reasons I’ll will share soon. Here are a few of the differences
In The Umbrella Man the author used characterization to make you think the little old man was a nice gentleman who just wanted money for a cab ride home. The mother thought he was a gentleman because of his shoes, but is still suspicious. He makes a deal with her to trade his expensive silk umbrella for money. She gives in and makes the trade. He sprints away clearly not looking for a cab. The mother and daughter follow him. They see him walk into a bar and buy a drink with the money they gave him. When his is finished he grabs another umbrella from the coat rack and proceeded to play the same trick on another stranger. It wasn’t till the end that the mother and daughter realized that he was not who they thought he would be. In The Landlady the author opened the story by a man named Billy Weaver looking for a place to stay. He found a nice “Bed and Breakfast” and he rung the doorbell and the lady opened the door before he could even take his finger off the bell. She talked to him and made him sign a guestbook which had names in it from more than 2 years ago. He recognized the names and started to get suspicious. He noticed a couple of stuffed animals. The landlady did it herself. He continued to drink the tea and he got tired and then passed out. He woke up to the landlady getting ready to stuff him. He had been poisoned by the tea. In the end the plot revealed that she was a killer who stuffed things for her own enjoyment. The Umbrella Man and The Landlady both have plots that use false lead that makes you think that people are not who you assume they