The Labeling Theory: The Labelling Theory

1220 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Theory of personality development in middle childhood

The labelling theory was first discovered by Howard Becker in 1963. The labelling theory is a label applied to an individual based on their gender, ethnicity, age, religion, class ,etc . The labelling is done by individuals and social groups but then acquires its own reality , we generate images of others for which we act and satisfy expectations. The deviation is not a quality of his act but the consequence of the application of the label for part of others of rules and sanctions. The target is someone who has been labelled successfully ; deviant behaviour is behaviour from the label applied. There are two types of labels; primary and secondary. Primary labels are a label that barely causes a reaction from others and it doesn 't affect …show more content…

Children are at higher risks of being labelled which can have long term negativity. It can be said that our identity is taking shape slowly along the life, childhood being a key step in our references can influence us greatly , indeed, we can say that according to them we define and depending on how you describe our behaviours our personality will be marked by one or other guidelines. The judgments and labels are usually put in childhood , just as the human being is more influenced by the type of brain electromagnetic waves that prevail at this stage in the brain. Therefore, the messages we receive from our parents are recorded in the subconscious as capital letters , and can stay there a long time , even for life , depending on personal growth is made. Labelling a child , it 's only going to make the child behave according to the dictates of the label, despite that also the rest of teachers and students will go knowing you and know you by the existence of this " label " will have the capacity to fall on the bias to watch just the conduct this issue and that they are descriptive of it , returning to the theme of " self-fulfilling prophecy’. The child 's personality is in constant change , which , assign labels is so delicate that it could even have negative effects on the proper development of the …show more content…

Explains the " labelling theory " applying it to education. He holds that all persons responsible for social control assigned to individuals "tags" with which qualify attitudes, behaviours , thus making a social classification.
It’s really, really easy to label kids. “She’s so talented” or “He’s such a bad boy” are phrases that fall from our mouths without a second thought leading them to believing this label.The child 's personality is in consistent change , which applying a label is so delicate to the point that it could even have negative effects to the best possible development of it. Since children are at the point in life where they 're dependent on teachers and parents if they label the children, the children will process this and act upon the label that it 's giving to them. There are positive labels as well as negative labels
It is common for parents and teachers to ensure that children often behave in a certain way we place them a label "He 's shy, is clueless, is lazy ..." Although many times we intend to bring about change, we are far from helping the child, we promote these behaviours and they are repeated. It is the self-fulfilling prophecy itself or the Pygmalion effect, extensively studied in

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Myths, Misfits And Masks

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Labeling theory,” which states that our self-identity and behavior can be altered by the names or terms that people use to describe or classify us. Labeling is using descriptive terms to categorize or classify something or someone. Sometimes these labels can have positive impacts on our life or as Amanat’s mentioned that these labels can limit our full potential to do anything by believing that people’s expectation about us is how we should define ourselves. In doing so, we act against our true nature because we’re trying to live up to others expectations or deny their assumptions.

    Read More

  • The Scarlet Letter: The Problem with Labeling Other People

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once we understand why we act in labeling people, we can work on eliminating the habit of labeling others. We can overcome it by promoting absolute approval, sympathy, and consideration. We can learn to observe and experience the world without judgment. We can remain detached from expectations and demands. We can learn to accept people as they are and will not cause them unnecessary pain.

    Read More

  • The Conflict Theory Of Deviance In American History X

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously

    Read More

  • Labeling, Law, and America's Drug Policy

    3280 Words  | 7 Pages

    Labeling theory focuses on the reactions of other people and the consequent results of those reactions. A person who is exposed to have engaged in deviant acts is shunned from society and labeled, "prostitute," "crook," "addict," "molester," and so on. According to Becker, this process creates a group of "outsiders", who then begin to associate with other outcasts. When more and more people begin to think of these individuals as deviants, they respond to them as such; thus the deviant reacts to such a response by continuing to engage in the behavior society now expects from them. In this pape...

    Read More

  • Stereotypes In Jean Piaget's Stages Of Cognitive Development

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Jean Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, children go through four stages of development which are sensory motor, pre-operational, concrete- operational, and formal operations. The second stage, which is pre-operational is the age where preschool age students who are between the ages of two and a half to four years old start to develop a sense of self. Between two and a half and three is the age where children start to develop stereotypes associated with gender roles as well as views of how the world works around them. Children who are in the age range of two and a half and four that are enrolled in a child care program are being exposed to various views about what is acceptable behavior for their

    Read More

  • The Power Struggle at the Occidental Child Development

    4286 Words  | 9 Pages

    To protect the anonymity of the children I have observed I have labeled the children according to their classroom and sex. In the following ethnography I refer to the Hungry Caterpillars, the Busy Bees, and the Terrific Tigers. The school is broken down into three classrooms according to the child’s age and skills. The two year-olds are the Hungry Caterpillars (HC), the three year-olds are the Busy Bees (BB), and the four year-olds are the Terrific Tigers (TT). The children are aware of their classroom names and often refer to them when addressing others or themselves. I must make a note that some of the children are held back because they lack certain skills they need before they can move onto the next classroom so I have also included the age of the children to clarify for

    Read More

  • Understand The Lesbian Identity By Henry Tajfel

    1076 Words  | 3 Pages

    To some degree everyone is influenced by social identity, the theory composes the idea that the social world is divided into ...

    Read More

  • Anti-Bias Education: Social Identities

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many social identities to take into consideration. It is not just race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, language and social class. There are also categories such as health, education level, and body type. With a surplus of social factors, it is easy to have a hidden prejudice toward certain social identities. It is critical to first acknowledge how institutional forms of prejudice will covertly affect a child’s educational experience. As you can imagine, overt prejudice, a term used to describe the explicit discrimination you see, is easier to spot and therefore avoid. But the covert/indirect prejudices are much easier to slip through the cracks of lessons and classroom materials. For example, having a selection of children’s books that showcase only white, slim, heterosexual family structure is an illustration of a way ...

    Read More

  • The Cycle Of Socialization Analysis

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    Bobbie Harro states in “The cycle of socialization” (2000), “No one brings us a survey, in the womb, inquiring which gender, class, religion, sexual orientation, cultural group, ability status, or age we might want to be born. These identities are ascribed to us at birth through no effort or decision or choice of our own” (p.16). I was born into a system, just like everyone else, where I was judged and labeled due to the social categories that I identify with. What I have experienced throughout my schooling has shaped and molded my sense of self and the way that I view myself in terms of my gender and race/ethnicity. I live in a world where I have been both praised and ridiculed for these differing characteristics that seem to define me, but

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory

    573 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Labeling Theory is the view that labels people are given affect their own and others’ perception of them, thus channeling their behavior either into deviance or into conformity. Labels can be positive and/or negative, but I’ll focus on the negative aspects of labeling in high school. Everybody has a label in high school whether it is the “slut”, “pothead”, “freak” or the “jock”; it is one of the most apparent time periods in which individuals get labeled. Students have the mentality that whatever label is placed on them is going to be stuck with them forever, which then leads into a self-fulfilling prophecy. This, I feel, is a fear of being a “loser” that has been instilled throughout years by the principals, teachers, etc. An example of this is the pressure students are given to get a good grade. In order to get into an honors class they need to pass a certain test, should they not get into honors class the following year, then all throughout the rest of their remaining school life, they’ll never be able to be in honors class. They’ll then no longer be seen as the “smart” students they were “before”(even though they still are), they’ll now be labeled as “dumb” and eventually start to believe, and become their label. Another example of this is being labeled a “slut”. When a girl has been labeled a slut, early or in the middle of her school life, the label sticks with her all throughout her remaining school years. At first, she could reject this label, and try to “change”...

    Read More

  • The Theories of Deviance

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...lower. They denote to the individual as such and the individual instigates to discuss to himself. Subordinate deviance outcomes and unconventionality perseveres in the individual. The deviant is obligatory into the establishment of further deviants and their nonconformity is strengthened. One opposition to this model is that certain determined deviants obligate not ever been determined and branded. Nevertheless, the labeling theory similarly originates into outcome when individuals tag themselves, thoughtful of themselves while they reflect others perceive individual. The classification a deviant can distress the unconventional into revulsion at his or her nonconformity, so they will leave deviancy.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory

    3342 Words  | 7 Pages

    The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.

    Read More

  • Crime And Attachment Theory

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime is defined by those in power- People in power shape the criminal law with their values without an objective understanding for right and wrong. Not only are acts labeled, but also people- Labels define a person without even meeting them. A person defined as smart or intelligent are more likely to succeed and stay above the law. In contrast, negative labeling can stigmatize a person into reincarnating the name given, resulting in criminal acts and major long-term consequences. Subject interpretation of behavior involves both positive and negative labels- Negative consequences are labeled only when do the labeling. The act itself can have a negative label but the contributor can be excused of the crime. For instance, a person can kill someone, but not be labeled as a murder due to an individual in take on the crime. The consequences of labeling can unfold a tale of actions, shutting out the individual will result to criminal offenses due to the feeling of detachment as well as, isolation. A label; rumor or suspicion can leave a permanent print on someone’s life. The individual will want to live up to the label depending on the severity and notice of the name. Primary deviance is, crimes or acts that are not recorded or labeled as crimes. Simply, an act within the norm and

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Piaget's Stages Of Cognitive Development

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over the last couple of months I have had the opportunity to student teach at Crim Elementary School. During the few months that I was there, I was placed in a preschool classroom. I was able to learn a lot of different techniques and strategies that I will be able to use in my future classroom. Every student has a different personality so I was excited to get into the classroom and observe how to help each student. For this paper, we were asked to choose three different theories. These theories were used to help us understand every child’s developmental level. The three theories that I chose to do were Piaget’s three stages, temperament, and behaviorism-operant conditioning. One thing that I was excited to see was how often these theories

    Read More

  • The Implications of Labelling Theory and how It Affects Individuals

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).

    Read More

More about The Labeling Theory: The Labelling Theory

Open Document