Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technological change and social change
Humans and the environment
Human relationship with the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technological change and social change
The writer of the book The Journey Home, zestful environmentalist Edward Abbey is angry at and loathes the idea of incessant update of technology and machinery. To him, it’s completely unnecessary; even more so is it a hindrance to human being’s natural development. Disrespectful towards nature and harmful to each individual’s supposed natural way of living, the modern world in Abbey’s eyes is what needs to be “updated” to fit as real human being’s natural habitat.
The updates in technology, in Abbey’s eyes, is the modern world’s way of it’s distasteful declaration of war towards nature. He claimed, “What should Yosemite Valley be? It should be what it once was: the kind of place where a person would know himself lucky to make one pilgrimage there in his lifetime. A
…show more content…
holy place. Keep it like it was”(145). Abbey sees the nature to be full of spectacle and miracle that it is what makes the earth a sacred and precious place to live in. Taking the Yosemite Valley as an example, it’s heft and it’s dignity as a natural wonder needs to be carefully treated and admired. However, the modern world is carelessly, violently stripping away it’s sanctity. The way the modern world is incessantly updating materially makes it loathsomely necessary for natural wonders to compromise their, in Abbey’s eyes, uncompromisable holiness, to the society’s earthly desires. The man-planned, man-made change on nature is considered as criminal and profane to Abbey, for it is consciously making the haven’t-yet-stripped, left-over holy lands on earth as mundane as the cold, metal technology and machinery. He woes and cries, from the moment the thought of changing the nature existed, it is inevitable for human beings to develop into their current mundane self. Abbey sees the modern world as an indifferent, passionless and meaningless ground of the living deads.
He condemns it to be harmful to each individual’s supposed natural way of living. He passionately stated that “They deny the world because the only world they know has denied them... The earth is not a mechanism but an organism, a being with its own life and its own reasons”(225). Although these sentences seem to have a lot of personal feelings injected in, the general idea is, actually, quite factual in terms of defining the society people live in today. Because they are too busy upgrading the efficiency of the world as well as the burden to the earth, the place modern people known as their home is no longer for them, but for robots; for machineries; for breathless steels. The modern world no longer recognize the natural wonders to be necessary for their personal developments. They see themselves as living machines, paying little attention to their spiritual development and their connection with the wilderness, breathing for the sake of being able to wake up and work. They denied the world in such a way that their ignorance for their need of the green is what is the most fearful and pitiful to
Abbey. Unbearably sarcastic, cynical and sometimes unmannerly, Abbey’s expressive words sent his anger, his depression and his worries across well enough to raise awareness of protecting the environment as well as protecting the spiritual health within oneself in the modern world. He remarked that the modern technology is impeding people’s artless way of living as a member of the nature society. Quite a common sense; yet surprisingly, the countries that are most involved with machinery development has the unhappiest citizens, while the less technologically developed countries have the most good-hearted subjects. And that is what Abbey was angrily trying to prove. We are all solely subjects of the earth.
The majority of this piece is dedicated to the author stating his opinion in regards to civilization expanding beyond its sustainable limits. The author makes it clear that he believes that humans have failed the natural environment and are in the process of eliminating all traces of wilderness from the planet. Nash points out facts that strengthen his argument, and quotes famous theologians on their similar views on environmental issues and policies. The combination of these facts and quotes validates the author’s opinion.
As soon as the novel begins, we are introduced to the concept of saving the environment. The book begins with the narrator explaining his life-long dream of helping the world. He says that the cultural revolution of the 1960’s contributed to his ambition. However, as time went on he
In his journal, Thoreau muses upon twenty years of changes in New England’s land and beasts. He lists the differences in plants and animals, comparing them to past accounts and descriptions. He questions if the growing human presence has resulted in “a maimed and imperfect nature.” Cronon believes that this is an important question to consider. He points out that although changes do happen in nature, it is not so easy to determine how they changed. He is also not sure if Thoreau’s description of “a maimed and imperfect nature” is the correct way to refer to ecology, since it is by its essence, a fluid system of changes and reactions. Cronon does not deny the impact of
Being born into an underdeveloped country and a poor family are like curses. It is every child 's dream to be able to reach their maximum potential and be that significant someone, but certain obstacles such as little family income and a lack of an education can stunt their humanistic growth as a whole. In the documentary film Which Way Home by Rebecca Cammisa, the goal was to explore the different personal perspectives of several unaccompanied minors as they are trying and wishing to successfully crossing the Mexican and U.S. border so they can have a second life living in the promising land of the United States. Throughout the documentary, the most significant topics that were being investigated are: transnational parenting, childhood and work, and the importance of establishing a new life and identity in the United States.
Quammen’s main point is that the word “environmentalism” has a connotation that implies the sole importance of the survival of humanity. The destiny of mankind depends on his environment, but the environment is not a “background.” He suggests the replacement of the “environment” with “nature.” When one thinks of nature, one thinks of animals, plants, waterways and such. It is a broader term, but it better captures the whole picture. The word is dangerous because of what it might lead people to believe, much like the beginning paragraph of the
He is unable to understand why they can’t leave nature alone. His frustration stems from the fact that so much valuable land is being destroyed, to accommodate the ways of the lazy. It seems as though he believes that people who are unwilling to enjoy nature as is don’t deserve to experience it at all. He’s indirectly conveying the idea that humans who destroy nature are destroying themselves, as nature is only a mechanism that aids the society. In Desert Solitaire Abbey reminds the audience, of any age and year of the significance of the wild, enlightening and cautioning the human population into consciousness and liability through the use of isolation as material to ponder upon and presenting judgments to aid sheltering of the nature he
This quotation opens your eyes, I know of no one who wants to destroy the earth either. The majority of man kind doesn’t think too much about what is happening to the earth due to their actions. When most of us drive a car or spray deodorant we don’t think of the consequences. It is the responsibility of those who create problems to help fix them and prevent them from happening again. In society today it i...
... position is very radical. He thinks civilization has brought disorder and has distance the human beings from nature. It is true that the ambition to dominate the planet has caused some people to destroy natural resources, increase the levels of contamination and lose the respect for our own nature. However, I cannot disregard all the progresses that humans have done through out the years, which have helped improve the quality of our life. The respect for nature has to continue along with the growth of our knowledge.
He believes that the wilderness has helped form us and that if we allow industrialization to push through the people of our nation will have lost part of themselves; they will have lost the part of themselves that was formed by the wilderness “idea.” Once the forests are destroyed they will have nothing to look back at or to remind them of where they came from or what was, and he argues everyone need to preserve all of what we have now.
The book is often cited as an environmental classic - of which there can be little doubt - but it is also said by some to have largely triggered the modern environmental movement. Its warning about the dangers of
Have you ever had a time when you had to never give up? Never giving up means keep trying until you get it. In the story, Fly Away Home by Eve Bunting, the theme is never giving up. The first reason to support the claim is the bird, who never gives up on trying to get out of the airport. The second reason to support the claim is the dad, who never gives up on finding a school that Andrew can go to. The last to support the claim is Andrew, who never gives up on earning money for him and his dad to buy an apartment. Those are three reasons to show how the theme of the story, Fly Away Home, is never giving up.
The advent of industrialization and mankind's insatiable quest to devour nature has resulted in a potentially catastrophic chaos. Our race against time to sate the ever-increasing numbers of hungry stomachs has taken toll on the environment. Man has tried to strip every resource Earth has to offer and has ruthlessly tried to eliminate any obstruction he perceived. Nature is an independent entity which has sustained and maintained the balance existing within it. Traditionally, spring season hosts the complete magnificence of nature in full bloom. It is evident in the very first chapter when Rachel Carson talks about a hypothetical village which was the epitome of natural rural beauty and was a delightful scenery for the beholder. The village
The future holds a different meaning for everyone, for some it holds hope while for others it holds despair. This constant wondering about the future has influenced many works to be written about the future. Some of these works propose a blissful future, but the majority paint the picture of an unfortunate dystopian world. Recently I read Daughters of the North, a novel in which the dystopian future of England is shown. Shortly after reading Daughters of the North, I watched The Road. This film showed a similar view of the future, yet more grim and unappealing that Daughters of the North. In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting these two works to show two different points of view of what a dystopian world is. After watching The Road I realised there was a large amount of books and movies that believe the future will be grim. I believe this is because as humans we fear what may be in our future due to the conflicts that we face today and wish to warm the world.
Ecocriticism asserts that humans are “peoples of 'place'” (Bressler 231), our lives defined by the environment that we inhabit and the necessities of survival that are dictated by nature. The more we recognize this innate and deep connection—for example, through the reading and analyzing of the nature-human dynamic in literature—the stronger and healthier this relationship will become. We as humans will recognize our dependence on the earth instead of our dominance over it; we will recognize ourselves as “guardians” and learn how to better appreciate and protect the environment for future generations of authors and poets to continue to explore.
It is hard to argue that industrialization has not brought humans a greater ability to manipulate their environment. The list of things that we are now capable of is staggering. Computers, mind-bogglingly sophisticated machines in and of themselves, have enable a world of things to be possible, including the reading of genetic code, prompting Rifkin, in an interview, to deem genes “the raw resource of the biotech industry”. The genetic material that governs every aspect of the development of life is now merely a material for the manipulation of an entire industry. We can clone things (not very well, but still), creating identical creatures at will. “we can go to the moon, orbit earth in space for weeks at a time, send television images around the world in a matter of seconds, and transplant hearts” (Southwick, 170). We can so alter our environment that we are completely unaware of the natural things around us. A room in Japan can completel...