The Irony of the Title of Tatamkhulu Afrika's Poem Nothing's Changed
In this coursework, I am going to write about the irony of the title of Tatamkhulu Afrika's poem Nothing's Changed. I am going to achieve this by going through the poem and picking out important points, like how his familiarity of the place hasn't changed etc, and explain these points and relate them to being ironic to the title.
We assume that the poet has been away from this place for a long time at the beginning of the poem. The poet then informs us that the place was District Six. Even though no board said it was District Six, he recognizes the place. This could be because District Six was like a part oh him. Therefore we can
…show more content…
From these two lines we can see that the poet is trying to express something.
"No sign says it is
but we know where we belong"
These two lines are actually referring to the whites only inn. The poet is trying to say that even though no sign says it's a whites only inn, but the blacks know they are not permitted. It's the internal feeling in them, which differentiates them. So maybe the place has changed physically, signs may be been taken out, but the blacks and their position of worth in the society has not changed as yet.
In the next stanza, the poet is trying to look inside the cuisine.
"I press my nose to the clear panes" ====================================
This line has two meanings to it. Not only does this show a childlike act and the reminiscence of his youth, but is also shows that he is an outsider. This is ironic as the whites are the actual outsiders and so like before, things still remain the same. The whites still live a better lifestyle, still taking over their land, their comfort and all their financial stability.
In the next stanza, we see a complete contrast to the previous
…show more content…
So basically, nothing much has changed for the blacks.
In the last and final stanza there is a change in tone from the poet. The tone of the poem so far has been depressing, nostalgic and angry. But now there is a sense of destruction.
The poet begins the stanza with:
"I back from the glass,
boy again"
This shows him backing from reality to how he was before during the Apartheid era. He was an outsider then and still remains as one.
The poet has a desire for weapons, like during Apartheid. He wants to destroy the reign of whites over the blacks so the desire for weapons and hatred towards the whites still do exist in blacks.
He wants to cause pain to the whites as to reflect to what they have caused for the blacks.
The poem then ends with: "Nothing's Changed". This shows us the poet's conclusion. Even though the place has changed physically, apartheid is over, signs are taken out, people are free to go wherever they wish to- there is still segregation, discrimination, hatred and envy between whites and blacks.
In conclusion, his familiarity with the place, segregation between whites and blacks, meanness and envy of a child, desire for
Respect is shown to the laws and guidelines provided by their ancestors. Every morning Neena expresses to Ruby while she sits beneath the tree and connects to her spiritual ancestors, ‘Whitefellas call it meditation, but for us it’s remaking our spiritual connection to the country every day’. It is extremely important that there are people that are very close to their culture, so the tribe remembers their ways. Archie and Tjilpi are exceptional illustrations of...
reacts to the crosser. At the beginning of the poem, the speaker’s first impression of the swamp
The subsequent section is concise as it provides the depressive historical context of the poem. The usage of factual period of time 1949 and the war / Now four years dead- conveys the suffering of the exiles and their endurance of the lengthy wait to migrate as they weren’t economically or physically capable to leave earlier.
Smith-Shomade, B. E. (2008). Surviving In Living Color with Some White Chicks Whiteness in the Wayans’ (black) minds. In D. Bernardi (Ed.), The Persistence of Whiteness (pp. 344-359). New York, NY: Routledge.
In part fictional and part autobiographical novel “A Small Place” published in 1988, Jamaica Kincaid offers a commentary on how the tenets of white superiority and ignorance seem to emerge naturally from white tourists. She establishes this by using the nameless “you” depicted in the story to elucidate the thoughts they have when visiting such formerly colonized islands. This inner mentality of the white tourists reveals how tourism is still a form of oppression for the natives of such formerly colonized tourists as it continues to exploit them. I will be focusing primarily on page 10 of the text to illustrate this.
Blackmur's remarks apply equally well to The Waste Land, where syntactical sequence is given up for a structure depending on the perception of relationships between disconnected word-groups. To be properly understood, these word-groups must be juxtaposed with one another and perceived simultaneously. Only when this is done can they be adequately grasped; for, while they follow one another in time, their meaning does not depend on this temporal relationship. The one difficulty of these poems, which no amount of textual exegesis can wholly overcome, is the internal conflict between the time-logic of language and the space-logic implicit in the modern conception of the nature of poetry.
Armand was proud to be a father by a boy to bear his name. Until three months later, she cried out to Armand. “Tell me what it means!” He answered Desiree with a statement saying “that child is not white; it means that you are not white. (p.83)
One particularly useful cross-disciplinary element employed in concrete poetry is the use of space. The poetry of Emmett Williams, Seiichi Nikuni, and Ilse and Pierre Garnier in particular, make use of spatial relationships in their poetry. The use of space can be employed in place of traditional grammar and syntax to convey meaning in concrete poetry, particularly when the spatial position of one element is taken into consideration with other elements of the poem. Another element that may arise from these spatial relationships is a temporal aspect that all poetry employs, but which becomes uniquely meaningful in the context of the concrete poetry of the twentieth century. Without these relationships concrete poems may appear as crude distortions of words on a page, with no significant sense or meaning to communicate. Therefore, the temporal/spatial relationships between poetic elements become necessary tools which the reader needs in order to fully understand the linguistically driven meaning behind many concrete poems.
Primarily in Lines composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey the mortality of creativeness and imagination is expressed by Wordsworth. This is a poem about the beauty of an old cathedral called Tintern Abbey. He hasn’t been there in five years and he brought his sister along. Even though imagination isn’t immortal, there is a way to reclaim it, “That time is past, / and all its aching joys are ...
In the first two lines we are given the stage in which the dead man’s story is to be told.
out. This contrast is a start for what is continued at the end of the
The second passage, lines 106-114, is further evidence of intertextuality which, like the first section, appears as an ov...
"The White Man's Brden." International Academy: Login to the Site. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.
The poem is not said to of been set in a particular place but I
people want to continue to read the poem a few more times. His was of