Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of technology in sport
Disadvantages of technology in sport
Disadvantages of technology in sport
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of technology in sport
“Goal!” The fans rise in celebration as the ball crosses the line. Or does it? The ball was just over the line according to the referee. However, technology says otherwise. Over the years, there have been many controversial calls in all sports. Human referees have always made mistakes. It has been debated whether technology should take over refereeing. Some argue that technology will improve the accuracy of calls in sports, while others claim that it will remove from the human aspect in sports. Technology should not be used instead of referees in sports, because it is costly to operate, occupies more time during matches, and takes away from the human element of sports.
Installation of technology in sports stadiums would require a lot of funds, which could be used to bring up young players instead. Technology is expensive to operate and maintain, while referees require much less funds and money. In soccer, it would take approximately $260,000 per stadium to install goal-line technology (Gaylord). In addition, an extra $3,900 per match would be needed to operate the technology (Gaylord). This does not include fees for repairing and fixing damaged parts. Referees, however, are only paid around $64,500 per year and $1,900 per match (Arshad). This shows that referees are much less expensive than new technology. Technology is unnecessary and expensive, and money in sports should be used to develop new players of the sport.
Technology in sports would cause too many stoppages during matches. Officials would take a lot of time to review the decision made by technology. This would drain all of the excitement from the matches. In addition, television providers would most likely use the breaks to insert even more advertisements. This would de...
... middle of paper ...
..., and would ruing the flow of sports. In the end, sports are a human activity, and should be managed by humans.
Works Cited
Arshad, Sameer. "Premier League Referee Salary List 2014." TSM PLUG.
Tsmplug.com, 14 Aug. 2013. Web. 14 May 2014.
referees/>.
Gaylord, Chris. "'Roboref' Runs onto the Soccer Field." Christian Science Monitor 24
Dec. 2013. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 May 2014.
"Goal-line Rulings Left to Humans." New Zealand Herald [Auckland, New Zealand] 8
Mar. 2010: 7. Student Resources in Context. Web. 12 May 2014.
Pielke, Roger, Jr. "How Innovations Such as Goal-line Technology Make Sport
Better." Theguardian.com. Guardian News and Limited, 05 June 2013. Web.
12 May 2014. .
...s. Parents need to stop getting too involved in their child's sports and let the kids play the games and have fun.
Abstract: The Stadium construction boom continues, and taxpayers are being forced to pay for new high tech stadiums they don’t want. These new stadiums create only part-time jobs. Stadiums bring money in exclusively for professional leagues and not the communities. The teams are turning public money into private profit. Professional leagues are becoming extremely wealthy at the taxpayers expense. The publicly-funded stadium obsession must be put to a stop before athletes and coaches become even greedier. New stadiums being built hurt public schools, and send a message to children that leisure activities are more important than basic education. Public money needs to be used to for more important services that would benefit the local economy. Stadiums do not help the economy or save struggling towns. There are no net benefits from single purpose stadiums, and therefore the stadium obsessions must be put to a stop.
The challenge for implementing an instant replay system in MLB can potentially impact the speed of the game. That has been one of the major arguments against replay in MLB by the baseball purists. The purists seem to like the human and the mistakes that come along with humans making judgment calls that impact the game. The purists don’t seem to want to embrace emerging replay technologies in an effort the get the call correct because replay would interfere with the human element the purists embrace. “The lack of instant replay in baseball is one of those crises, and simply curling up in a ball and pretending that an issue in 2011 doesn't exist because it didn't exist in 1911 is p...
The main target of this research are two main groups, the spectators and the athletes. These are two important stakeholders being affected by decisions related to nanotechnology’s use in sports. The fans and spectators of sports were reached through an online survey. By posting the survey on multiple websites and forums I was able to reach out to different people in different countries and get a representative opinion about the given issue. The athletes on the other hand were approached through a focus group and one-on-one interviews. The opinion of these two groups is important to address the gap mentioned above since an agreement must be reached to what extent nanotechnology should be allowed or not. Moreover, this research will focus on Egyptian athletes and fans because Egypt is a developing country and one of the aims of this research is to try to see if developing countries will be able to benefit from nanotechnology in sports rather than developed countries.
...o be a major part of life; but the hopes are that many things about football are changed in order to make the sport safer for everyone.
In conclusion, football and soccer have their similarities, but these similarities are superficial. There are many fundamental differences, such as the use of one’s hands being illegal in soccer, except for the goalie when he/she is inside his/her respective eighteen-yard boundary. Another example is the alternation of a team’s offense and defense in football as opposed to the simultaneous effort of the offense and defense in soccer. These differences in rules, rituals, and concepts distinguish these two sports from each other. However, there are similarities, such as the fact that both sports allow eleven players on each team to play on the field at a time. Also, the area where one scores is in the same locations in both sports, the end zones of football and the goals of soccer are on opposite sides of the field.
Commonly referred to as football, soccer has become a revolution in many parts of the world. It is a big part of people’s lives, be it for leisure or career (Mason, Viii). Soccer has developed over the years to include many different variations of the game. According to Television Fanatic (par 2), many of the variations develop out of need while others are tailored to suit particular groups of people like the disabled.
... part of the games heritage. Sports have changed and will continue to do so. There will always be that technological advance that gives players an edge, but one can guarantee that there will be someone who thinks that edge is harmful to the game. To protect the integrity, each sport adds regulations and rules to the rulebook if necessary. As seen with golf, the golf ball and titanium driver are completely different than when they were back in 1960, but the USGA has placed regulations on how they are manufactured. Thus, in 2000, the winner only scored two strokes better on the most prestigious tournament the professionals play each year. Critical or not, professional sports are changing, becoming more competitive, and with it comes controversy. The facts are out there, and only you can be the one to answer the question, is technology harming professional sports?
Professional Sports have been around for over a hundred years in America. Millions of people each year watch the National Football League. Technology has increased greatly over the last 20 years and has had a major impact in the NFL. The NFL uses technology for player’s health, scouting, and on the field with headset communication and instant replay.
..., this would lead to chaos, indiscipline, a breakdown in social order and a failure in the ethics of sports. The World Anti doping Agency has joined with the medical team in order to maintain and monitor the standards deemed appropriate by the Anti doping Agencies, to promote healthy sportsmanship for all competitors.
In the 19th century, soccer started to come to life in America. Some colleges started to play the game in the 1820s, with the first contest taking place at Harvard in 1827. Then, a huge invention took place in 1855. That year, the Charles Goodyear soccer ball was invented. Charles Goodyear created these soccer balls with vulcanized rubber. 12 years later in 1867, soccer took two huge steps. The first standardized soccer rules were published that year. Now, graduates from different schools could play together and had proper rules to follow when playing a game. But later that year, another just as, if not mor...
...thletes but males and females should stay separated when it comes to sports. This controversial problem is dead and society is ignoring this issue by keeping sports separate between genders and this should stay this way.
The referees categorized as blind were cursed with the inability to see more than two feet in front of their faces. No matter how blatantly obvious a penalty appears to be, this type of referee will flabbergast the stadium by making no call. In fact, the absence of penalties has led fans of the game to speculate as to the real cause of these referees’ optical challenges. Some suggest that perhaps their eyes have nothing wrong with them at all. Just maybe, the bright stadium lights draw in all of their attention. While they focus on the lights, watching the game becomes nearly impossible. Another suggestion is that they left their glasses in their other striped shirt and the whole game is nothing but a blur. Regardless of the cause of their visual disturbance, blind refs continue to shock the crowd with their inability to see the game as well as any fan seated in the cheap seats of the stadium.
Turning sports into a way of life instead of a leisure activity has generated fierce competition for athletes to be the best at what they do. Having a "natural ability" no longer is enough. One must work long and hard hours to gain an edge on the competition. However, these days, even good training cannot guarantee a victory. For athletes and coaches the drive to be at the top is so great that they look for shortcuts to their end goal: winning. The one who wins is always the one who is remembered in the end; finishing second is worse than finishing last. When this type of attitude becomes predominant, it is not so surprising that they try any and all methods of cheating the system. In this way, doping has become a common practice for athletes to gain advantage on their competition. Is this a practice that we as the general public should accept, or is there something we can do to change the status quo?