Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient Greek culture
Plato's influence
The contributions of Plato to western civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient Greek culture
On the surface, pagan culture and Christianity would appear to have very little in common. Traditionally, the Hellenistic pagan cultures worshipped multiple deities; the central of which were the twelve Olympians of the Greek Pantheon. Lesser divine beings and demi-humans also played a significant role in the Hellenistic culture. The worship of these deities was the mainstream of religion during the Hellenistic period until the rise of the great philosophers.
Amongst these philosophers, Plato emerged as one of the founding fathers of Western philosophy. Living from roughly 428 BCE until 348 BCE, Plato’s theories predated Christianity by at least four centuries. Because of this, it can be assumed that early Christian worshippers used Plato’s teachings as a basis for their religion. It is evident that there is a surprising amount of similarities between Plato’s philosophy and early Christianity. By utilizing Plato’s theories and philosophy, early Christians were able to bridge the gap between paganism and Christianity. This allowed for an easier conversion from a polytheistic culture into a monotheistic religion. But why was this conversion so easy and where exactly did Plato and his theories fit?
In order to answer these questions, this paper will include an analysis of Plato’s theories as well as their influences on early Christianity. It will demonstrate to the reader that Plato’s theories are, in fact, still in use in Christian Theology and conclude with an evaluation of this assessment.
Plato and the Theory of Forms
In order to understand the influence of Platonism on Christianity, one must first comprehend the Theory of Forms. First discussed in Phaedo, Plato asserts that the Theory of Forms is an answer to the questions a...
... middle of paper ...
...he one that most Christians know today. This God is quite different from both the New Testament and Plato’s. In Genesis, God states, “For behold, I will bring a flood of waters upon the earth to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life under heaven. Everything that is on the earth shall die.” This God does not desire human beings to accept knowledge but rather to accept His rule and obey. This particular deity is about fear, power, and absolute control; so much so that those who do not adhere to His law, their deaths are assured. This is seen in Deuteronomy 7:2, it states, “When the Lord your God gives them over to you, and you defeat them, then you must devote them to complete destruction.” God is characterized not as a kindly guider of souls, but rather the harsh taskmaster intent on defeating enemies of His and spreading the influence of His supporters.
* Plato. "Plato's Crito." YouTube Video. YouTube. TeacherOfPhilosophy, 8 June 2011. Web. 1 Apr. 2013. .
These aspects of their culture have made a significant contribution to their quality of life. Moreover, these topics will be examined in relation to the twelve Olympian gods and their associates. The ancient Greeks practiced a religion that was, in effect, a building block to many ensuing pagan religions. This religion revolved around their reverence for the gods. Essentially, the Greeks worshipped numerous gods, making their religion polytheistic.
Such reflection brings to light how a pre-rational social imaginary can confine a Christian inside of the Platonic allegory of the cave. In Plato’s analogy, the cave inhabitants cannot be criticized for thinking that their way was the only way because it was all they ever knew. Following along the same train of thought, this brings to question whether it is wrong for the Christian social imaginary to believe that its way is the only way. In two sentences, Plato answers the question of why Platonic views should be considered compatible with Christian faith. He says, “Each of you in turn must go down to live in the common dwelling place of the others and grow accustomed to seeing in the dark. When you are used to it, you’ll see vastly better than the people there” (Republic, VII, 519 d-e). Just as Plato marks levels of hierarchy between the higher spiritual realm and the lower material realm, one could translate Plato’s cave allegory into a hierarchy of the higher “real” world and the lower “perceived and deceived” world. Just as moving outside of the cave signifies the “real” world, while confinement inside the cave depicts the “perceived and deceived” world. This also can be compared to the Christian social
"Plato." Literature of the Western World, Volume 1. 5th edition by Brian Wilkie and James Hurt. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001. 1197-1219.
In this paper I will be discussing the four charges brought against Socrates in Plato’s essay The Apology and why exactly each of these charges is completely fictitious. The four charges brought against Socrates were that he argued the physical over the metaphysical, he argued the weaker claim over the stronger claim, he went against the gods, and he was corrupting the youth. Each of these four charges is false for varying reasons and I will be addressing each explanation on why each charge is a complete sham, after discussing each charge.
Plato was born in Athens, Greece around 427 B.C. He was always interested in politics, until he witnessed his mentor and teacher, Socrates, death. After learning of the callousness of politics, Plato changed his mind and eventually opened up The Academy, which is considered if not the first, one of the first Universities. Students at the Academy studied many different fields of science, including biological and astronomical. The students also studied many other fields, such as math. Plato developed many views that were mathematical in nature. He expressed these views through his writings. According to Dr. Calkins of Andrew University, "Timaeus is probably the most renowned of Plato's thirty-five dialogues. [In it] Plato expresses that he believes that the heavenly bodies are arranged in perfect geometric form. He said that because the heavens are perfect, the various heavenly bodies move in exact circles." (Calkins 1). Of course that is a much summarized view of what Plato discusses in Timaeus, but still a solid view on Plato's beliefs about cosmology. Cosmology can be loosely defined as everything being explained and in its place or beautiful. The cosmos is beautiful because everything is perfect. Plato understood that when he defined the most perfect geometric design as the circle. In a circle one line is always equidistance from one point. In Plato's universe there are two realms, eternity and time. The factor that creates "time" out of the chaos of "eternity" is the Demiurge. Plato's Demiurge can be defined as an architect creator theological entity. The importance of the Demiurge in this paper is to compare and contrast him with Boethius's God in The Consolation of Philosophy.
...rison to the allegory, one can best grasp the concept of knowledge and how the Sun and our senses guide our education. The concept of our knowledge being a result of our surroundings in the world, rather than a text book, is simply fascinating. How would those who questioned our Earth being round rather than the earlier beliefs of it being flat without believing that there is more than what is seen. The Wright brothers were considered heretics because they had believed man could fly. It was by asking questions that they could not have known to be true, that promotes progress and development in the world. To be able to ask questions in a Socratic fashion, to question what one does not know, is learning. Plato was truly a man well before his time, as he was able to ask the questions that were deemed most difficult in an age where religion dominated knowledge.
Plato’s view on existence can be understood by discussing his theory of Forms. The theory of Forms or Ideas is about the existence of ideas in higher form of reality, the existence of a reality inhabited by forms of all things and concepts. Plato used example of objects such as table and rock and concepts like Beauty and Justice to illustrate the notion of Forms. Plato further describes Forms as a being possessed by concepts. For example, Virtue has different characters; but they all have a common nature which makes them virtuous.
In the following essay I will be explaining Plato’s belief in the Forms and will be critiquing it. The structure of my essay will begin with an explanation of Plato and some background information on him. The third paragraph will contain a brief view into Plato’s view of reality as it pertains to the planes of existence. The fourth paragraph will explore the parallel between mainstream Christian and Plato’s Theory of the Forms. The fifth paragraph reaffirm the information given on Plato’s views into reality and truth, as it pertains to the Theory of the Forms. The sixth paragraph is my critic of the Theory of the Forms, as it pertains to faith and truth. The seventh paragraph is my critics over Plato contradiction over
Ancient Greek religion was a polytheistic religion that believed in many gods and goddesses. To Greeks, these gods and goddesses would be able to control everything. Each god or goddess had his or her own distinct personality and territory. “Greek myths explained the origins of the gods and their individual relations with mankind” (Hemingway). Unlike current religions, like Christianity and Judaism, Greek gods were not known for being moral or being truly good or evil. Many of the Greek gods and goddesses were disorganized and self-contradicting. Although this was apparent to the Greeks, the Greeks believed that their religion was to brighten their own lives, rather than give them godlike guidance. The best example of a self-contradicting Greek god is Zeus – father of all gods and humans (Cunningham and Reich 32-33).
Plato’s Republic introduces a multitude of important and interesting concepts, of topics ranging from music, to gender equality, to political regime. For this reason, many philosophers and scholars still look back to The Republic in spite of its age. Yet one part that stands out in particular is Plato’s discussion of the soul in the fourth book of the Republic. Not only is this section interesting, but it was also extremely important for all proceeding moral philosophy, as Plato’s definition has been used ever since as a standard since then. Plato’s confabulation on the soul contains three main portions: defining each of the three parts and explanation of their functions, description of the interaction of the parts, and then how the the parts and their interaction motivate action. This essay will investigate each segment, and seek to explain their importance.
Plato: For today’s class Aristotle and I are going to discuss our ideas on the Theory of Form
in the ideal order, not necessarily in the things themselves, but rather above them, in a world by itself” (Chaput, C. p.2). For the concept,therefore, Plato substitutes the Idea. He completes the work of Socrates by teaching that the objectively real Ideas are the foundation and justification of scientific knowledge. At the same time he has in mind a problem which claimed much attention from pre-Socratic thinkers, the problem of change. The Platonic theory of Ideas is an attempt to solve this crucial question by a metaphysical compromise. The Eleatics, Plato said, are right in maintaining that reality does not change; for the ideas are immutable. Still, there is, as contended, change in the world of our experience, or, as Plato terms it, the world of phenomena. Plato, then, supposes a world of Ideas apart from the world of our experience, and immeasurably superior to it. He imagines that all human souls dwelt at one time in that higher world. When, therefore, we behold in the shadow-world around us a phenomenon or appearance of anything, the mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea (of that same phenomenal thing) which it formerly contemplated. In its deligh...
Plato believes in gods and higher powers but Plato does not believe in Christianity. The reason Augustine believes in Christianity is because in Augustine's young adult years he believes these years in his life are a perfect reflection of how Christ love moves humanity out of sin and moves it into the joy of God's presence. In his years before he found Christ love he was indulging in lust and was in love with the idea of love. " I was not yet in love, but I was enamored with the idea of love”(Confessions,12). That emptiness and lack of God and that yearning sensation of wanting happiness comes from us being created with having piety and happiness but losing both of them in the fall “but when we lost happiness, we did not lose the love of it” (City of God,72).Plato doesn't believe in Christianity but believes in in the archetypes to Plato those are his gods and they are his religion.
Still innocent and so naïve, the common human consciousness slowly began to raise itself, giving birth thereat to great men, who will forever remain in the hearts of the “consecrated”. One of those great men was Plato.