Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individualism vs collectivism in society
Individualism vs collectivism in society
Individualism and collectivism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Individualism vs collectivism in society
The Robber’s Cave Experiment was conducted by a man named Muzafer Sherif. It was an experiment that Sherif introduced in order to help demonstrate his contribution called the realistic conflict theory. The realistic conflict theory is negative prejudice, stereotypes and all around conflict in a group when it comes to competition for desired resources. He believed that the strife between both groups occurred due to the competition for limited resources. This experiment was conducted using two groups of eleven year old boys. The group of twenty-two boys were unaware of each other and came from a white middle-class background. All of them were protestant and had two parents. The boys were randomly assigned to two groups. Each of the group were unaware of the other group’s existence. Furthermore, after the two groups have been established they were picked up as individual groups and brought to …show more content…
Robber’s Cave State Park in Oklahoma during the summer of 1954. The first week (first stage) of the experiment, they separated the two parties in order to ensure that the two camps started to create bonds and relationships within the group. Each group fabricated a name for their camps, one was named The Rattlers while the other one was named The Eagles. Each group became slowly aware of the other groups existence and tried to the camp staff if they could arrange some sort of competition between the two camps. The next stage took 4-6 days to take place and this phase introduced the two groups into competitions between them, Both the Eagles and the Rattlers would have competitions where there would be one winner and one loser. The winners would usually receive a medal or some sort of trophy. While the losers received no consolation prize. This created tension between the group’s and eventually led to the staff of the camps to physically separate the kids to avoid any further violence. Furthermore, as the good sportsmanship deteriorated between the two groups, the final stage was designed in order to resolve the quarrel between them. Originally, they attempted by making them watch a movie together in order for both groups to reconcile. However, it failed thus having no effect between both parties, and they remained hostile towards one and another. This led to the experimenters to formulate a common problem for the two groups to come together and fix. The first issue the boys faced was a problem with their water supply, and the two groups would have to work together to get the water pumping through camp again. The boys were able to solve the problem after finding a clog in the pipe and clearing it out. After this the groups had to work together on other problems, and slowly but surely the two groups became great friends, and were able to eat together and ride the bus home together without any more trouble between the two Importance of this study comes from the way the boys acted and responded to the different events and trials they were put through.
The boys first showed that when humans are put together with strangers to work towards a common goal they will form groups with roles in order to work together better and more efficiently. This was shown from the formation of the two groups The Eagles and The Rattlers. The boys then showed that when put into a competition with another group that tension and rivalry would be sewn between the competing groups. This was illustrated through the actions the groups made against each other like destroying each others flags. The groups then showed that when faced with a common issue they could come together and work towards fixing the problems at hand. The boys showed that this was possible when they worked towards the common goal of fixing the water supply. The significance of this experiment exhibits that the cooperation of a group functioning towards a shared goal can do so much into solving the conflict peacefully as to a dysfunctional
team.
The paper talked about the new mud glyph cave art site the was discovered in northern Alabama. It is believe that the artifacts and the images that is located in the cave linked back to the Early and Middle Woodland periods. The cave was named “19th Unnamed Cave” by a naming system that was used be University of Tennessee. Other main points in this paper include the 19th Unnamed Cave, the mud glyph art that it contains, and how the mud glyph contributes to the understanding of mud glyph assemblage preservation, and it helps illuminates the chronological placement of the art form. The cave is located in northern Alabama with a cave mouth of 25 m in diameter and with more than 5 km of underground passageways. The article hypothesized that since the entrance of the cave had some fluvial action, there would no archaeological material that would have been preserved.
“Emotional regulation can lead to more fulfilling social experiences. Children of the same age argue on about the same socio-cognitive and moral level, face the same transitions and life events. These similarities are expected to improve their understanding of their peers’ situation, perhaps to some extent independent of inter-individual differences due to level of development, personality, or upbringing. The second reason follows from the fact that peers form a group. Being together with a group of likeminded peers should intensify some of the emotions children experience.” (Salisch, 2001) The group they formed was a good social experience for them. Without the group I think the boys would not have gone on to do great things if they had not had the
Identity is fragilely within a constant spectrum of change and development, yet the Amish culture has chosen to be oblivious to harmful manipulations between parental authorities and the adolescents within their budding youth. Adolescence is a period of overwhelming expansion, physically and mentally, and instruction, with clear foundations of moderation, can ultimately equip a troubled teenager with the proper tools to unlock facets of untapped potential. The Amish culture limits this search for identity, and adversely, ill-equips their adolescents to combat definite crises within the confusing realms of identity exploration. Additionally, the church, founded under the Amish culture, invokes powerful penalties for individuals that a...
Turman, P. (October 25, 2000f). Group Cohesiveness and Conflict: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
Despite being only twenty-five miles apart, Mystery Cave and Niagara Cave are surprisingly different. One of the major differences between Niagara and Mystery Cave is that Mystery Cave has bats. Another difference is Mystery Cave is owned by the State of Minnesota, while Niagara Cave is privately owned. On the other hand, since the caves are located in southeastern Minnesota, they both are made of limestone, and ancient fossils are found in each of the caves.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. The purpose of the experiment was a landmark study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. In social psychology, this idea is known as “mundane realism”. Mundane realism refers to the ability to mirror the real world as much as possible, which is just what this study did. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard" and they were made to conform to these roles.
Sherif argued that intergroup conflict occurs when two groups are in competition for limited resources. This theory is supported by evidence from a famous study investigating group conflict: The Robbers Cave (Sherif, 1954, 1958, 1961). Sherif (1954) conducted an experiment with young boys in a summer camp. The participants were 24 schoolboys, came from the similar,
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. The experiment was a landmark study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. In social psychology, this idea is known as “mundane realism”. Mundane realism refers to the ability to mirror the real world as much as possible, which is just what this study did. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard" and they were made to conform to these roles.
This theory (Fine, 2004) states that when there is competition for resources negative feelings will arise. The boys proved this when the competitions for resources came up the tension built so fast and wild the researchers had to stop early. Therefore, Sherif may have been well known for his laboratory work, but he was even more comfortable outdoors. His experiment, that is sometimes forgotten today, leads to a theory that can still be seen as true today.
The boys of the Robbers Cave experiment began the third week with extreme animosity between the Eagle and the Rattler campers. This was a unique challenge because week three focused on having the boys interact with one another. Initially, teams were grouped together in noncompetitive conditions (Gaertner, 2000, 99). The expectation was that this would begin to diffuse hostility between the Eagles and Rattlers. Surprisingly, tension was still high between the two groups.
Ernest Bormann's Symbolic Convergence Theory offers a promising method of looking at small group interaction and cohesiveness. When individuals who are not familiar with each other come together for the sake of achieving a common goal, be it a group in an organization or students working on a school project, the symbolic convergence theory presents an understandable and generally accurate stance on how cohesiveness within the group is attained.
In the 1950’s, Muzafer Sherif conducted a study at Robber’s Cave State Park in Oklahoma (Sheriff & Sherif, 1953, p. 5). Baumeister & Bushman (2011) explained, “.22 white, middle class, 11-year old boys thought they were going on a summer camp experience. Sherif divided the group into two groups of eleven. During the first stage, the two groups had no contact with each other. The boys in each camp became good friends.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
One of the biggest questions that humans have is “what is reality”. Plato suggests that, “ we are born in illusions,” (Plato) and that the truth is initially blinding. “The Myth of the Cave,” is a narrative story about the idea of reality, it is explored though an allegory about a man finding out the truth about reality coming from a life in the dark. They can only learn about true mainly through reason and truth. The story is told as a metaphor for what happens in the natural world and how people can be stuck in the dark about reality. Plato tells the story through the voice of Socrates, his mentor.
A group can only be called a team if the members are actively working together toward a common goal. A team must have the capability to set goals, make decisions, solve problems, and share responsibilities. For a team to be successful, trust must be earned between its members by being consistent and reliable (Temme & Katzel, 2005). When more than one person is working on a particular task, inconsistent views or opinions commonly arise. People come from different backgrounds and live through different life experiences therefore, even when working towards a common goal, they will not always see eye to eye. Major conflict that is not dealt with can devastate a team or organization (Make Conflict Work, 2008). In some situations, conflict can be more constructive than destructive. Recognizing the difference between conflict that is constructive to the team and conflict that is destructive to the team is important. Trying to prevent the conflict is not always the best way to manage conflict when working within a team setting. Understanding conflict, what causes it, and how to resolve conflict effectively, should consume full concentration.