Bormann's Symbolic Convergence Theory

2382 Words5 Pages

Bormann's Symbolic Convergence Theory

Ernest Bormann's Symbolic Convergence Theory offers a promising method of looking at small group interaction and cohesiveness. When individuals who are not familiar with each other come together for the sake of achieving a common goal, be it a group in an organization or students working on a school project, the symbolic convergence theory presents an understandable and generally accurate stance on how cohesiveness within the group is attained.

The symbolic convergence theory is praised and even considered a bit unusual, because it meets the criteria for both scientific and humanistic standards. Symbolic Convergence Theory is credible because it fulfills the "twin objectives of scientific knowledge" (Griffin, 1991, p.34). Bormann's theory meets the scientific standards of explanation of the result, relative simplicity, and practical utility.

Symbolic convergence theory meets the humanistic standards of aesthetic appeal (in some cases), community of agreement, and reform of society. While it appears that all five requirements must be met in order to make a good scientific theory, it is only necessary that some of the standards be met to achieve a good humanistic theory. In this light, it appears that Bormann has created more of a humanistic theory than a scientific one. However, because symbolic convergence theory manages to meet the criteria for three out of five of both sides, the theory serves as an acclaimed attempt at combining the two views (Griffin, 1991, pp.34-42).

The symbolic convergence theory is based on the idea that members in a group must exchange fantasies in order to form a cohesive group. In this theory, a fantasy does not refer to fictitious stories or erotic desi...

... middle of paper ...

...e outcomes. Additional forecasts on what happens next will also support the scientific standard for prediction of future events.

Though I have mentioned many weaknesses of Bormann's symbolic convergence theory, generally, the theory provided me with beneficial insights on the process of group cohesion. Without cohesion, it is difficult and unenjoyable for a group to accomplish the task or goal at hand. Bormann provides a useful alternative for looking at interpersonal communication within a group, and understanding how cohesion is formed through the symbolic convergence theory.

References

Griffin, E. (1997). A first look at communication theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Jackson, B. (1997). Linking the immediate with the mass-mediated theatre in organizations:

The case for symbolic convergence theory. Online: http://www.it.com.pl/scos/jackson.htm.

Open Document