The Importance Of The Government Invasion Of Privacy

924 Words2 Pages

Government Invasion of Privacy Privacy is the state of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. The government is doing the total opposite of this. In fact, the government is invading everyone 's privacy which means that they are intruding into the personal lives of US citizens without a reason to. This should give the person whose privacy has been invaded a right to sue the government for damages against the person or entity that has been intruded. Privacy is essential to giving a person the time to reflect on events that have transpired personally, religiously, and politically. It is as essential as sleep; it helps to provide the time to formulate opinions and decisions on all minor and major things in a person 's life. …show more content…

You might think that it is not possible for information from your telephony metadata to reveal enough about a single person to cause harm, but it can actually expose an extraordinarily large amount about our habits and our associations. For example, calling patterns can reveal when we are awake and asleep, our religion (for example, if a person regularly makes no calls on Eid day, or makes a large number of calls on Christmas Day), our work habits and our social aptitude, the number of friends we have, and even our civil and political affiliations. It cannot be denied that modern terrorists, online, are a real risk. This is how they contact each other, learn to make bombs and carry out attacks, they can even, without resorting to illegal means, gather at least 80% of all information needed about the enemy (with a risk now much higher, thanks to Edward Snowden). Also, it is through the internet that the NSA can recognize and prevent attacks before they even happen, which has happened over 50 times since 9/11. Of course, we can 't stop every attack, but it is unnecessary for citizens to have to live their lives knowing they 're being watched without consent. People need to realize that the law enforcement agencies have taken away their privacy, and will probably never give this privacy back. This is a terrifying and intolerable fact. Former federal agents revealed that more than 50 law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and The U.S Marshall Service, possess a handheld radar that sends sound waves through walls and receives back images on a screen of persons on the other side of the wall. It is not acceptable for any human being to be able to invade the life of another human being to this

Show More
Related

  • Government Surveillance vs Privacy

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is the American government trustworthy? Edward Joseph Snowden (2013) released to the United States press* selected information about the surveillance of ordinary citizens by the U.S.A.’s National Security Agency (N.S.A.), and its interconnection to phone and social media companies. The motion picture Citizenfour (2014), shows the original taping of those revelations. Snowden said that some people do nothing about this tracking because they have nothing to hide. He claims that this inverts the model of responsibility. He believes that everyone should encrypt Internet messages and abandon electronic media companies that track personal information and Internet behavior (op.cit, 2014). Snowden also stressed to Lawrence Lessig (2014) the importance of the press and the first amendment (Lessig – Snowden Interview Transcript, [16:28]). These dynamics illustrate Lessig’s (2006) constrain-enable pattern of powers that keep society in check (2006, Code: Version 2.0, p. 122). Consider Lessig’s (2006) question what is “the threat to liberty?” (2006, p. 120). Terrorism is a real threat (Weber, 2013). Surveillance by social media and websites, rather than the government, has the greater negative impact on its users.

    Read More

  • Privacy Is Not Privlege

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    The greatest irony of all lies in one word “protection”, the police are meant to protect us and yet it is more likely that we should be killed by one of them than it is we be killed by a terrorist, and the government who protects us by spying on us. Our privacy is our right, not our privilege, and the government should not protect our rights, by violating them.

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden and Classified Files

    1837 Words  | 4 Pages

    President Obama insisted that the government is not invading privacy but is just looking for potential terrorist activities that can be thwarted by preemptive measures. Even after this statement by the President there are those who speculate that the government is "snooping" into their lives and monitoring their internet activity. Although there is this paranoia that the government is "watching", it may actually make people more aware of what they do on their computers and cause them to practice safer internet browsing techniques.

    Read More

  • Public Surveillance in the USA

    2230 Words  | 5 Pages

    The critical issue that needs to be addressed in the argument for or against the use of public surveillance system in the USA is which one takes precedence, viz, whether safety of the public and property at large or the invasion of the rights of the individuals who are subjected to some sort of interference in their privacy. In other words, does a citizen have an unfettered right to privacy even when it comes to issues relating to the enforcement of law in prevention of terrorist attacks, crime and restoring security and peace of the citizens at large? I propose to argue in this paper in favor of the need for public surveillance system by advancing the reasons for its imperative and take the view that it does not amount to prima facie violation of individuals' rights and in contravention to the rights guaranteed under the constitution...

    Read More

  • The Government is Wiretapping You

    1485 Words  | 3 Pages

    Privacy (Pri-va-cy) n.1.the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. Americans fear that technological progress will destroy the concept of privy. The first known use of wiretap was in 1948. It’s no secret that the government watches individuals on a daily bases. According to the constitution, the Fourth Amendment serves to protect the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Unreasonable is the word that tips the balance On one side is the intrusion on individuals’ Fourth Amendment rights and the other side is legitimate government interests, such as public safety. What we consider reasonable by law, the government might not think so. The word ‘privacy’ seems to be non-existent today in the 21st century; the use and advances of technology have deprived us of our privacy and given the government the authority to wiretap and or intervene in our lives. Our natural rights we’ve strived for since the foundation of this nation are being slashed down left to right when we let the government do as they wish. The government should not be given the authority to intervene without a reasonable cause and or consent of the individual

    Read More

  • The Fourth Amendment Of A Citizen's Right To Privacy

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every citizen has a fundamental right to privacy. No citizen should have the government looking at his or her information without his or her permission. The amendments in the constitution should be enough to protect citizen’s privacy. The government should not have the right to collect people’s personal information.

    Read More

  • Individual Privacy versus National Security

    1933 Words  | 4 Pages

    Much has changed in our governments view on what is considered to be violations of our individual rights. The argument is not about the ideal of privacy or the ideal of security, it is about the improper use of data collected by the government that is misrepresented and improperly utilized in violation of our very own Civil Rights and Liberties. This is allowed through silver tongued legal representation sponsored by the government for the government to exercise the ability to use loopholes in the legal system. The very Supreme Court in which we entrust to make the legal and moral decisions on privacy versus security is a judge nominated by the same political system (government) that has enacted such distrust. Our forefathers warned us in their speech and tried to save us in their laws. We have failed them by our actions and with our greed.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Crucible

    542 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States was founded on the idea of political freedom, liberty, and no social hierarchy. These foundations provided an image of Freedom for the America, making it every immigrants dream to one day settle in the United States. However, every year each year that image is fading away, as our civil liberties are fading away. I can’t remember the time when privacy, a civil right guaranteed by the the bill of right was actually obeyed by. Due to the loss of our rights, and somewhat freedom I believe the the safety, security and well-being of the many should not outweigh the privacy, and freedom of the individual.

    Read More

  • Technology and the Invasion of Privacy

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Technology and the Invasion of Privacy As citizens of America we are all entitled to our rights of privacy. When something threatens this guaranteed privacy we tend to take extra precautions to prohibit prolonged violation. As the advancing world of technology continues to grow and expand, so do the amount of cases involving privacy invasion. Technology drives these privacy-invading crimes; however, crime also drives technology, creating a vicious cycle.

    Read More

  • Government Surveillance Pros And Cons

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    Government surveillance is unconstitutional, it violates the rights of American citizens and it causes anti-American movements. [This is very important in determining the legality of the issue because the fourth amendment of the constitution clearly defends the rights of the citizen] “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The rights to privacy are defended in the constitution, there are various requirements in order to prove the necessity of surveillance before it can be permitted (fourth Amendment). Therefore, the current

    Read More

  • Invasion Of Privacy Ethical Issues

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many contentious ethical topics out there today that has caused a major argument in our society and still continue to do so as time goes by. One of the contentious ethical topics that we will be looking at in this paper is the invasion of privacy by the United States Government. The main reason as to why I view this topic as a contender is because for the past year's invasion of privacy has caused a lot of controversy among many Americans and still continues to do so as the years goes by. The reason for that is because many Americans like to keep their private life private and hate it if other people who are not family member invade are in it. Although this is a major topic in our society today,people find it harder when it comes

    Read More

  • Government Surveillance Pros And Cons

    858 Words  | 2 Pages

    Privacy is defined by many as the ability for a person to act as they desire -these actions being legal of course- without being observed by other people. Privacy is a right granted to all American citizens in the fourth amendment which states “people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizures”. Although our founding fathers could have never predicted the technological advancements we have achieved today, it would be logical to assume that a person's internet and phone data would be considered their effects. This would then make actions such as secretive government surveillance illegal because the surveillance is done so without probable cause and would be considered unreasonable search or seizure. Therefore, access to a citizen’s private information should only be provided using probable cause with the knowledge and consent of those who are being

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Government Surveillance

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some scholars view surveillance as a good thing, no matter if the privacy of Americans is invaded or not. In his article “Privacy and the Surveillance Explosion”, Timothy Mack states, “however, public acceptance of surveillance has risen in the United States, and the rate of approval for public surveillance cameras continues to rise (now around 70%) (Mack, pg 2). This may be true for some, but one man cannot speak for the masses. The average American is angry about their privacy being invaded and calls the government to take action to stop the NSA from spying. (Nicks, pg 3). The American people believe that the NSA has too much power and that some of this power needs to be taken back.

    Read More

  • Surveillance and Privacy Issues

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    2) It is getting ever easier to record anything, or everything, that you see. This opens fascinating possibilities-and alarming ones.”

    Read More

  • How Technology Impacts Our Privacy

    891 Words  | 2 Pages

    As technology penetrates society through Internet sites, smartphones, social networks, and other modes of technology, questions are raised as the whether lines are being crossed. People spend a vast majority of their time spreading information about themselves and others through these various types of technology. The problem with all these variations is that there is no effective way of knowing what information is being collected and how it is used. The users of this revolutionary technology cannot control the fate of this information, but can only control their choice of releasing information into the cyber world. There is no denying that as technology becomes more and more integrated into one’s life, so does the sacrificing of that person’s privacy into the cyber world. The question being raised is today’s technology depleting the level of privacy that each member of society have? In today’s society technology has reduced our privacy due to the amount of personal information released on social networks, smartphones, and street view mapping by Google. All three of these aspects include societies tendency to provide other technology users with information about daily occurrences. The information that will be provided in this paper deals with assessing how technology impacts our privacy.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of The Government Invasion Of Privacy

Open Document