Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of problem-based learning
Characteristics of problem based learning
Principles of problem-based learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of problem-based learning
Research supports the problem based approach to learning. Various studies globally have found that problem-based learning improves student learning and engagement (Boaler, 1997, Cotic and Zuljan, 2009). A review of research has found that problem based learning ‘develops more positive student attitudes, fosters a deeper approach to learning and helps students retain knowledge longer than traditional instruction’ (Prince, 2004, p. 223). However, there are limited research studies on the effectiveness of problem based learning on conceptual understanding of mathematical concepts. An international study (Tasoglu and Bakac, 2014) compared problem based learning with traditional learning on the conceptual development of scientific concepts and found …show more content…
There are many factors that can assist in conceptual understanding through problem based learning. Teachers need to pay close attention to these factors if conceptual understanding is the aim of the activity.
The nature of the problem
The main feature of the problem based learning is that it engages the students in solving authentic problems and help them build deep mathematical understanding in the process of problem solving. It is very different from the method where students complete exercises by following guided instruction to gain procedural knowledge. In problem based learning, the students are required to use more than just procedural knowledge. They need to analyse the given information and reason to make sense of the problem tasks and concepts involved. They need to identify possible ways to solve it as well as develop, justify, and evaluate arguments about the possible solutions. The choice of the problem, therefore, has a critical role in engaging and sustaining mathematical inquiry in
…show more content…
A real and meaningful task will engage the students and encourage them to get involved in solving the problem. A carefully chosen problem can ‘engage all of the students in the class in making and testing mathematical hypotheses’ (Lampert, 1990, p. 39). The complexity of the task should be such that it shouldn’t be too easy or too difficult for them. It should be just above their current level so that it challenges them. A problem that is too difficult can be discouraging and counter productive. Erickson (1999) states that the tasks need to focus on a particular mathematical concept and ‘present situations in which no readily known or accessible procedure or algorithm determines the method of solution’ (p. 516). It should provide opportunities for multiple strategies for solution and multiple representations of the concept. This will facilitate the learning of all kinds of learners as the concept could be understood in multiple ways (diagrams, charts, symbols, graphs etc.). For example a problem based task around cost of packaging chocolate can help students understand the concept of surface area and volume of 3D shapes. Some students might draw different kinds of packagings and even be creative and invent new type of packaging. Others might look the physical boxes of chocolates. Students will look at volume of different 3D shapes (rectangular prism, triangular prism, cylinder etc.) to calculate the most
The SOE Conceptual Framework: Think Critically, Transform Practice, and Promote Justice. Three rudimentary beliefs that seem as if they should be second nature to any good teacher, which must be laid out because often times the very thing that is most looked over and moved past are the things that are most necessary to functionality. Ever since the three legs of the Conceptual Framework were introduced my freshman year, I have thought that these ideas were very basic and easily integrated in teaching without too much effort. When a teacher takes the initiative to knowingly incorporate these three legs naturally and smoothly within his classroom, only then will they be on the path to becoming a master teacher.
The Article "No Tears Here! Third Grade Problem-Solvers" by Kim Hartweg and Marlys Heisler focuses on a professional development project conducted in third grade classrooms. This project centered on integrating problem-solving into mathematics. Through this project the classes participating used open response problems. When solving these open response problems, the students thought about strategies they could use and would work on these problems on their own or with a partner. The students participated in productive struggle and after they completed the problem, the students would share their ideas and possible solutions. This presentation of ideas brought about a class discussion, which ended with the students summarizing the classes findings.
In the article “Never Say Anything a Kid Can Say!” Steven C. Reinhart shares his struggle of finding the fundamental flaw that existed in his teaching methods. He is a great teacher, explained mathematics well, he was dedicated and caring, but his students were not learning and with low achievement results, Reinhart had to question his teaching methods. He began to challenge himself. He committed to change 10% of teaching each year and over many years he was able to change his traditional methods of instruction to more of a student-centered problem-based approach. This article promotes students to engage through the use of questioning.
In conclusion the problem-posing style to education is not only the most effective way in helping a student retain the information, but it also sets everyone, whether it be the teacher or the students, at equilibrium. I am not just speaking from my point of view, but also from Freire. We both came to the same conclusion and based our opinions off our own experiences. This style of education is very effective in expanding the minds of the receiver by making them more interactive in their learning rather than the typical lecture and take notes. In this style of education people teach each other and the teacher is not the only one enlightening the class with their knowledge.
Brooks, J.G. &Brooks, M.G. (1995). Constructing Knowledge in the Classroom. Retrieved September 13, 2002 for Internet. http://www.sedl.org/scimath/compass/v01n03/1.html.
While children can remember, for short periods of time, information taught through books and lectures, deep understanding and the ability to apply learning to new situations requires conceptual understanding that is grounded in direct experience with concrete objects. The teacher has a critical role in helping students connect their manipulative experiences, through a selection of representations, to essential abstract mathematics. Together, outstanding teachers and regular experiences with hands-on learning can bestow students with powerful learning in
I also learned that mathematics was more than merely an intellectual activity: it was a necessary tool for getting a grip on all sorts of problems in science and engineering. Without mathematics there is no progress. However, mathematics could also show its nasty face during periods in which problems that seemed so simple at first sight refused to be solved for a long time. Every math student will recognize these periods of frustration and helplessness.
In the play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the readers see the events that occur during the Salem witch trials. The Salem witch trials tore apart families and friendships, and there is a lot of judgment on people based on their relationship with God. “But God made my face; you cannot tear my face. Envy is a deadly sin,” (Miller 115). Within this Christian town, people are unable to read a text other than the Bible without being accused of witchcraft.
As a contemporary mathematics education researcher, Richard Lesh is know for describing what has been known as models and modeling perspectives in regard to mathematical problem solving, learning, and teaching (Lesh & Doerr, 2003). Models are defined as “purposeful mathematical descriptions of situations, embedded within particular systems of practice that feature an epistemology of model fit and revision” (Lesh & Lehrer, 2003). What modeling involves is a series of tests for fitness on models developed by the students as they think mathematically about a presented problem situation. This is all drawn from the work of other cognitive theorists (Dienes and Vygotsky included) who believe that we learn by interpreting our experiences. Lesh suggests that students go beyond the surface of their experiences to organize and transform information as well as to look for patterns in their experiences in order to predict (Lesh & Doerr, 2003).
If my tests and quizzes were only to solve the problems in the specified way, I don't think I would have succeeded. This doesn't only hinder the students' scores, but also their self-esteem in math. Math is almost always marketed as a
Solving problems is a particular art, like swimming, or skiing, or playing the piano: you can learn it only by imitation and practice…if you wish to learn swimming you have to go in the water, and if you wish to become a problem solver you have to solve problems. -Mathematical Discovery
Posing questions on materials covered and the quality of materials selected can create the desired environment for students to thrive. I want to inspire my students to think outside the box and to ask questions. Society needs thinkers not robots. The classroom plays an important part in aiding the growth of an individual. It is my duty as a teacher to impart knowledge because ideas have a way of changing lives. Examining and discussing ideas with students allows them to move to a new level of understanding, so that ultimately, they may be transformed.
Mathematics teachers teach their students a wide range of content strands – geometry, algebra, statistics, and trigonometry – while also teaching their students mathematical skills – logical thinking, formal process, numerical reasoning, and problem solving. In teaching my students, I need to aspire to Skemp’s (1976) description of a “relational understanding” of mathematics (p. 4). Skemp describes two types of understanding: relational understanding and instrumental understanding. In an instrumental understanding, students know how to follow steps and sequential procedures without a true understanding of the mathematical reasons for the processe...
A somewhat underused strategy for teaching mathematics is that of guided discovery. With this strategy, the student arrives at an understanding of a new mathematical concept on his or her own. An activity is given in which "students sequentially uncover layers of mathematical information one step at a time and learn new mathematics" (Gerver & Sgroi, 2003). This way, instead of simply being told the procedure for solving a problem, the student can develop the steps mainly on his own with only a little guidance from the teacher.
“They should be able to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the technologies and resources they use, and to assess how well those two things relate to the mathematics lesson being taught, keeping in mind subject matter, student diversity, and instructional strategies” (Ridener & Fritzer, 2004, p.97). It also allows for teachers to plan more hands on activities, classroom discussions, and open learning. Giving students the time to actually think about what they are learning and how they actually got their answers helps them gain a deeper understanding of what they are learning. “Encourage them to think about their thinking, to conceptualize how they got an answer to a math problem” (Wakefield, 2001, para. 6).