Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
College athletes getting paid
Annotated bibliography on paying college athletes
College athletes getting paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: College athletes getting paid
All college athletes should be paid. Not all athletes get a full ride scholarship for sports. Each and every player who participates on the team, should get paid, whether it is practicing or playing in the game. It may help them financially with school or to eat. This goes the same way with female athletes; they shouldn’t be treated any differently. Should college athletes be paid? Why not? All athletes should be treated the same. If they get paid, then they do not have to worry about having financial issues. Athletes put their bodies through so much pain and suffering, causing injuries and even causing severe pressure (Patterson). Coaches are paid millions just for coaching. If they can get paid, then the athletes should too. Not including …show more content…
Most of the money comes from scholarships and financial aid. President Obama considered paying college athletes. He believes that it would benefit them while in college. Over the years, it’s been a trending topic about athletes getting paid. Most athletes uses scholarships. Majority of colleges are debating whether paying college athletes would benefit them in any way. The most common two sports are football and basketball. These are the main two sports that athletes should be getting paid to do. The scholarships that most athletes receive are basically another form of way of them getting paid. They get scholarships worth up to $250,000 for their whole college career. Scholarships should be given to athletes full cost. It should cover everything they need in college. Maybe the top key players or known players on each team would be paid. They would either receive more or all. Most of the top recruit athletes used to be paid by colleges to come play for them. Football and basketball for men are getting paid billions in the NFL and the NBA, but not college. Only about 30% of athletes receive scholarships. Only about 100 athletes make it to the league. If colleges are making all this money off of athletes, then why not pay them at least half of it. Coaches get paid nearly $3 million a year. If players get that much a year, they would not have to worry about working …show more content…
Schools are making $144.8 million off of their athletes. The most paid school is Utah University. The suggestion has been looked into by the Selected Proceedings. NCAA President says college athletes should not get paid at all. College sports are much different than professional sports. In professional sports, athletes can sit the bench the whole season and still get paid. College should be the same way (Frederick). Players should get paid based off of their skill level. Their talent would pretty much dictate their amount of pay. Division 1 players would likely come before any other level in college sports. They get the most attention money wise. Yes, getting a job would help a little bit, but how long will it last? They could get laid off, fired, or even quit. If those things were to happen, then they would be back struggling with no money to have. Even though athletes would get paid, they are still eligible to play their sport. The money will only help him, not keep them from doing what they love to do. Doing what they love to do motivates them to do even better. Many people may say money's not everything, but to athletes that are struggling, it is. Some players would consider using their scholarship money for paying payments to pay for the rest of their
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote is regarding a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact that college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid to play for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income they bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
In 2004, over 40 schools brought in more than $10 million, with 10 of them bringing in over $30 million. Several athletes around the nation are worth more than $1 million to their school (Brown). Both of these statistics are proof that while these athletes are essential to their schools, they are still kept out of the revenue. Even though these universities won’t pay their players, the schools still have no problem giving their coaches some money. In 40 U.S. states, the head coach of the basketball or football program is the highest-paid public official (Edelman).
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
These athletes receive free tuition, textbooks, rooms, meal, and training. So they should not be paid extra money on top of that. Athletes may have to train hard, but while they are training, non-athletic students are out working to pay off debts. By paying athletes, it would hurt many smaller universities without much athletic funding, as they would not be able to buy the best players like bigger colleges could. College sports are meant to bring players and fans together to celebrate their school, but sports are becoming too big a part of college life. Colleges were created to help further educate students and all college attendees should be focused on education and not extracurricular activities like
Yes, college athletes with scholarship money are still in need of money to have in their pockets: they need personal money for gas, food, clothing, and other things that a college student may need. Paying these athletes may lessen the stress they have dealing with a job during the off-season. Unlike a student going to college with an academic scholarship, a college athlete on an athletic scholarship does not have the time for a job with workouts, classes, practice, and study time that is required. But if you compare a student athlete to just a regular student, the athlete still receives many benefits. Several of the Division I college athletes are always being looked at by their respective professional leagues. There are not re...
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
The scholarships given to college athletes are not sufficient enough to sustain them throughout the year, which is why I believe they should get paid and receive benefits. Student athletes, especially football and basketball players, play a major role in generating revenue for schools, businesses, coaches and the players do not see a penny. College athletes often do not have money in their pockets for extra food, clothes, housing and extracurricular activities. They also can potentially get dropped from their teams due to injury, leaving them incapable of paying for college. College athletes should be treated like every other employee because they work hard, and make everyone but themselves a lot of money.
Colleges make a plethora of money off of the sports teams and the players do not see any of that money at all but if they do then their performance would be poor on the field and off the field as well. According to Fred Bowen, “only football and men’s basketball are money-making college sports. Most others, such as field hockey, wrestling and swimming, do not attract big crowds or make big bucks.” (Should college athletes get paid?). Also the sports team that give out the most money for athletes to come and play for them, are football and men’s basketball. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue. They argue that if players were paid, a handful of exceptional athletes would receive large salaries while most players would receive a pittance, and would probably no longer be offered valuable athletic scholarships” (Paying College Athletes). It is not a surprise to anyone that the main athletes that do want to be paid is football and basketball players. They want to be paid because they bring in all of the money for the school and the...
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
“Top 25 College make over 100 million dollars with the top school University of Oregon making $196.0 million dollars and the 25th University of Kentucky at $96.7 million dollars” College athletes are just as well-known as professional athletes but they don’t get paid, why is that? While the NCAA coaches at a Division 1 school can make over 1 million dollars a year’ while the student athletes receive not one dollar for the use of their likeness, commercials, jerseys or television interviews. Most of these college athletes come from poor inner-city homes where the average family could not afford to send their children to college. Once they enter college those same families are unable to financially support them while they are in school.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
College programs make billions of dollars each year (“Should”). The NCAA and the colleges benefit tremendously from the revenue student athletes make, but the student athletes themselves? They don’t even get a penny! First, the student athletes make huge commitments to their schools and the Ncaa. Next, the student athletes have to juggle twice what the professionals getting paid millions of dollars have to do. Lastly, practice schedules can take away what career path they really want to go down. Student athletes should get paid.
There has been an extensive debate over the years about college athletes being paid and I honestly don’t see why there is a debate about it at all. The NCAA has strict rules about players receiving benefits from the school in forms of helping players and their families in the form of paychecks or even helping pay bills. College sports bring in an enormous amount of money for the schools every year and are expected to be given nothing in return. Sports do not only bring in money to schools but also more students and fans. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) have taken several players’ records and rewards from them for the simple fact of getting benefits from the school and that is just not acceptable (Allen 115). Athletes are just like every other student in the way of having to pay for housing, food, bills, and more. Having to balance school and sports gives athletes no time to have jobs which means they do not have a way to bring in money to pay for the essentials of going to