More handpicked essays just for you.
How can sport improve academic excellence
Academic success through sports
How does sport contribute to academic excellence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Emil Zatopek once said “An athlete cannot run with money in his pockets. He must run with hope in his heart and dreams in his head.” This quote applies to every college athlete. The quote means that an athlete may not be getting paid in college, but if they put in the hard work and dedication they can make it to the big leagues. College football is the second most watched sport in America. And the athletes playing the game do not even get paid a penny to play the game. In the sports world. this has been talked about for an extremely long time. College athletes put their body on the line for injury. They put their grades in on the line because of the hours they put on the court, or field (Keolanui). They also sell their apparel at the game and at stores and they get no money at all (Keolanui).
The NCAA athletics
…show more content…
make a revenue of 11 billion dollars (Rivers). The college gets all of the money (Keolanui). Why not pay the athletes? The University of Alabama made 143.3 million dollars in revenue (Rivers). The 11 billion dollars is more than the NBA or the NHL (Rivers). If they were payed, they could get fined for illegal hits or if they violate their conducts (Patterson. 2015). This would make the athletes think more when they are about to do bad stuff (Patterson. 2015). Players would be less willing to risk a steady paycheck to sign autographs or make money illegally (Keolanui). The coaches salaries keep on getting ridiculously high ( Admin. 2016). The bigger conferences make way more money than the small conferences through their huge television deals (Admin, 2016). The power five conferences are Big Ten, Southeastern Conference, Big 12, Pac-12, and Atlantic Coast Conference (Admin, 2016). The power five conferences make more money than the other conferences. The game would be more competitive (Rivers). The athletes would stay longer in school (Rivers). They would also get a degree if they stay all four years (Keolanui). Getting paid to play in college can make it easier to stay in school when a player’s draft stock can be improved, experience at the collegiate level enhanced and education on and off the field (Keolanui). If the NCAA paid athletes, the student athletes would not have so much stress worrying about where they are going to get money (Rivers). More teams will have high star recruits due to high star athletes staying longer at one school (Rivers). Some high star recruits want to be the highlight player for that team (Rivers). They could also, get payed for their performance in how they played in the whole season. This would make it a lot more competitive, because who does not want to make the most money you can make. They could also get a bonus, like all other jobs. for their academic so they can strive for excellence in the classroom. The athletes need to learn how to manage their money properly so something bad in the future does not happen to them (Rivers). The ESPN documentary Broke gave an inside view of the financial woes of many professional athletes, noting that around 60 percent of NBA players are broke five years into retirement (Patterson. 2015). In a survey about if college athletes were paid 64 percent said yes (Griffin,11). Many of these players are blamed for poor investment in a company that is going to go nowhere (Patterson. 2015). If the schools were allowed to pay players, they could teach them how to make better financial investment in the future (Patterson. 2015). It would teach them how to save their money. They do not have to be getting paid millions of dollars like professional athletes, but they could make a small salary (Rivers). Some of the players are getting caught, getting paid because they cannot get the simple needs to live (Admin, 2016). They are always getting payed under the table and the school is the only one getting blamed for it (Admin, 2016). The college athlete should be allowed to have their own endorsement deals (Griffin, 29). It would make money for the endorsement companies like Nike, Under Armour, Reebok, Air Jordan and other (Griffin,30). What athlete does not want to be endorsed by Nike or one of the other high up companies (Griffin,32). Cash management is one of the most essential skills to have in this world, because money is one of the most important things to survive in this world (Toptenion. 2014). Being a college athlete is a full time job (Rivers). it takes so much time out of the week (Toptenion. 2014). 43.3 hours a week is the average time that the players are spending in their sport (Toptenion. 2014). A full time job for a regular person is 40 hours a week. These athletes are risking their education for this team (Rivers). Due to their 40 hours a week they only have a small amount of time to work on class work (Rivers). The typical American full-time work contract often stipulates that the worker will work between the hours of 8 AM and 5 PM 5 days per week (Rivers). Salaries are also often based mostly around a 40 hour work week (Rivers). There is 168 hours in a week and 40 of it is with this sport by practicing. coaches session. playing the sport. traveling. and other required session (Toptenion. 2014). With the 168 hours subtracted from the 40 hours is 128 hours, they have to sleep. They sleep 80 hours a week on average, which, if subtracted from the hours it is 68 hours (Rivers). The average American spends 17 hours a week eating, which subtracted from the last total is 51 hours (Rivers). The average of time they are in class is 15 hours so if subtracted from the last total is 36 hours (Rivers). They also watch television, go on their phone, play video games, read, go to the bathroom for about 24 hours a week (Rivers). If subtracted from the 36 hours it is 12 hours (Rivers). If you double the time the student is in class hours and that is the time that the student is supposed to study. They only have 12 hours, when they are supposed to have double the amount of class time for their study time (Rivers). The student athletes are working two full time jobs with the sport and school work (Rivers). The athletes spend 50 hours every week studying and attending obligatory classes and study halls. Which means college athletes need to work 90 hours per week simply to stay in class on their scholarship. (Rivers) That is the similar to working two full-time jobs with an aspect job on the weekends simply to pay their bills (Rivers). Football is a demanding physical sport which the players give everything to win (Keolanui). Some of the time they get injured during the game and they have to stay in tip top shape (Keolanui). It is not a simple class where the student can get a C in and be find the athlete has to be A+ player or someone else will be and take their spot (Keolanui). The athlete could get injured anytime during the game or practice (Keolanui). They sacrifice their bodies everyday and put themselves in danger without pay (Keolanui). There are also further costs for sports that aren’t covered by scholarships. Renting or buying suits for banquets and fundraisers (Rivers). The sports that the athletes play is not a physical education class it is a dangerous game no matter what game it is (Sportster, 2016). If the student athletes were paid the graduation rate would go up. The main reason of going to college is to get a degree and what if they get hurt and they get released from a team and no one wants to pick them up (Rivers). What are they going to do next? No one knows they might go bankrupt. Many college athletes do not get drafted or pick up in free agency, so getting a degree is a great backup plan if they do not drafted or pick up in free agency (Rivers). Paying college athletes would a minimum of help them leave education with a little bit of money to purchase them time to discover a new path (Rivers). Any college athlete can not get a job because they have no time (Rivers). College athletes have a tough time making ends meet (Rivers).
There are many cost related to being a university athlete that the schooling doesn’t cover (Rivers). There are crucial expenses that aren’t covered by scholarships (Rivers). For instance, athletes who spend 90 hours every week coaching and studying will typically find themselves starving, well after the university’s dining facilities have closed (Rivers). University sometimes do not pay for textbooks, school supplies and clothes for going to football banquets more often than not have to come out of the players’ pockets (Keolanui). It is not fair that players have to put in extra time to keep up with their studies but also have to worry about being able to afford the extras that other students have to buy (Keolanui). If the NCAA paid its athletes, the scholars wouldn’t have so as to add additional stress worrying about where they’ll get their money from (Keolanui). If students didn’t need to worry about their funds, they might spend more time specializing in their game and their classes (Keolanui). This helps prevent drained and burnt out athletes from underperforming in their games
(Keolanui). The NCAA athletes make 11 billion dollars and none go to the students directly (Keolanui). Athletes should get a little bit of the 11 billion (Rivers). It should not be like professional athletes, but the salaries should be a smaller amount (Rivers). The NCAA makes more money than the NBA and the NHL (Rivers). The colleges will not get punished for the athletes wrongdoings (Rivers). The game would be more competitive (Rivers). They would also get a degree if they stay all four years (Keolanui). Getting paid to play in college can make it easier to stay in school when a player’s draft stock can be improved, experience at the collegiate level enhanced and education and education on and off the field (Keolanui). More teams will have high star recruits due to high star athletes staying longer at one school (Rivers). They could also get a bonus, like all other jobs, for their play on the field and academic so they can strive for excellence in the classroom. The athletes need to learn how to manage their money properly so something bad in the future does not happen to them (Rivers). The ESPN documentary Broke gave an inside view of the financial woes of many professional athletes, noting that around 60 percent of NBA players are broke five years into retirement (Patterson. 2015). Cash management is one of the most essential skills to have in this world. because money is one of the most important things to survive in this world (Rivers). It would make money for the endorsement companies like Nike, under armour, reebok, Air Jordan and other (Griffin,30). What athlete does not want to be endorsed by Nike or one of the other high up companies (Griffin,32). 43.3 hours a week is the average time that the players are spending in their sport (Rivers). College athletes have no time to study with all of the activities they do (Rivers). They cannot get a part time job, due to the 40 hours a week they spend with the sport.
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote is regarding a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact that college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid to play for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income they bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
Many sports people say that if the NCAA pays the athletes to play, it will encourage them to stay in school longer. The money that the athletes will receive at the next level will be bigger than any amount the NCAA can afford to pay them. Athletes argue that the NCAA and ESPN are making billions of dollars off of them to air their games; why can’t they get compensation for it. This argument is valid, but no matter what amount, free education is far more valuable than any financial amount. You’re talking about giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to
Another reason that college athletes should not be paid is because they are, under NCAA rules, to be considered amateurs. In the National Collegiate Athletic Association Rules it states, “College athletes are not to be paid, not to cash in on their prominence, never to cross any kind of line of professionalism.” Steve Wieberg, of the USA Today, studied the rules that the NCAA has placed on paying college athletes. He concludes that, “Athletic programs are meant to be an integral part of the educational program” (Weinberg). The reoccurring theme here should be obvious now —education is the most important part of the student’s time in college and being an athlete should come second.
College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
Some people argue about the poor financial situation some colleges are in and their ability to afford to pay student athletes this additional money. This does not make sense, though because Universities make tons of money off of their tuition and overpriced room and board. Also, the NCAA could be asked to chip in to pay for these additional scholarships considering that the NCAA, a non-profit organization, makes six billion dollars annually (Frederick 2013).
The cost of housing and food, puts a huge dent in college student’s pockets every year. College students need anywhere from five-hundred-dollars to one-thousand-dollars a year for food. Getting all the things you need just to make it through college can range anywhere from four-thousand-dollars to eleven-thousand-dollars a year depending on your needs (Frazier). Athletes have a hard time finding time for a job because the sport they play and academics take up their life. If the NCAA would allow schools to pay their athletes it would not only help the many athletes bringing in money to the school, but it could help the school as well by bringing up grades from athletes. When you don’t have to worry about if your bills are going to be paid or you can afford a place to live, you can focus more on the sport you play and the academics that come with
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
“A scholarship doesn't equal cash in a player's pocket. Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke” (Hartnett). Being an athlete in college is as demanding as a full time job. They also have to put the time in to be a full time student as well. That is a lot of time they have to commit for their university. Additionally if the student does not come from a wealthy family or a family willing to give them money, he or she may also have to add on a part time job on to that if they ever want to do something fun on a day off or get some food from somewhere other than the dining halls. Even when a student athlete has a job, it is almost impossible for them to keep it during the season because of their demanding schedule, ...
rahim Martinez Throughout the last century, college athletics have turned into a high revenue generating. industry. There have been several issues that have faced the college athletics, one of those being whether or not college athletes should get paid. The issue has been but in the spotlight has been due to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).
Not paying collegiate athletes is not fair. College football and men's basketball generate revenues of more than $6 billion every year. Yet not one penny goes toward paying the people who make the sports possible: the student athletes. None of the $6 billion dollars brought in every year by college football and basketball goes to paying the athletes that make it possible. That is only two sports bringing in that much money, just imagine all the money other sports bring in. If it was not for them, collegiate athletics would not exist and colleges wouldn’t be making that much money each year, so it is only fair to pay the people who make it possible.Michael Polak, states,"All colleges have work- study programs, so students can work in the library