Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral compass as healthcare professional
Ethical codes adhere to in health care
Legal and ethical issues in greys anatomy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral compass as healthcare professional
Doctors are not infallible; they can make mistakes. However, it is the responsibility of the medical authorities to notify the patient of the missteps. In this episode of Grey’s Anatomy, Dr. Derek had performed two surgeries on his patient, who had had seizures. Due to Derek’s mistake in the first surgery, the patient has to undergo a second surgery. The second surgery is successful, but later on, Dr. Addison informs the patient that she was preeclamptic. The patient being unaware of the term asks if she needs to be worried. Derek then stops Addison from disclosing the truth because Derek wanted to enjoy the success of the surgery and did not want the patient who just recovered from one surgery, to worry again. Nevertheless, Addison warns Derek …show more content…
To discern if the decision were morally right, we have to evaluate it based on the external criteria and internal criteria. “The external criteria… include scripture and church teaching, the community and its values, and moral principles and relevant laws” (Panicola 70). Although the scriptures or the church does not specifically address this problem, we can conclude from the writing and the teachings that it is wrong to conceal truth and pardon the person that commits a crime. This decision is not in harmony with the laws of the community. It would be unacceptable to the community because it would like to promote truthfulness and punishment of the law offenders. This decision also has to be evaluated on the basis of internal criteria. For the internal criteria, a person has to look inside oneself to evaluate the decision. Does the person feel satisfied with the decision and promote these values? The doctor’s decision does not give the inner sense of contentment; we experience “hate, discontent…confusion” (Panicola 71). Nobody wants to become a liar, thus it is not consistent with the kind of a person one would want to become. Moreover, the emotions indicate that something is wrong and these actions do not contribute to the doctor’s moral benefits. The decision of Derek to hide the truth does not promote what is right for right relationships; it definitely does not give a sense of inner content. Consequently, after evaluating the decision based on both the internal and external criteria, it can be concluded that the decision taken in the episode is morally wrong and has to be changed to option
American Medical Int’l, Inc. According to this theory, individuals’ decisions are guided by what they are supposed to do, not by consequences or effects. That is to say, a person’s action is ethically right if it coincides with a prevailing moral duty (“Deontological Ethics,” 2007). In the dilemma involving the patient Riser, Dr. Lang violated the theory of deontological ethics by not performing his duty of acquiring informed consent from the patient. By standard of conduct, Dr. Lang was supposed to present a consent form to Riser prior to the operation that would explain the procedure of a femoral arteriogram (although it was supposed to be bilateral arteriograms instead) and thoroughly explain the possible benefits and risks of the procedure. As a result, the patient should have the right to decide whether the femoral arteriogram should be performed or not. However, Riser was not aware of the femoral arteriogram at all. Therefore, deontological ethics should have been followed, which would advise Dr. Lang to follow the ethical duties of a healthcare professional, and those include obtaining informed consent from the
Timothy E. Quill in “Case of Individualized Decision Making”, described his patient Diane who was a vaginal cancer survivor, overcome alcoholism and depression. Dr. Quill diagnose her with Leukemia. He explained to Diane that the chemotherapy has only a 25% chance of survival and there were some complications involves in this process. Diane refused to take the treatment and decided to live the remaining of her life in a most enjoyable way possible, by avoiding all the pain of the treatment. Furthermore, when Diane heath condition deteriorate, Dr. Quill gave her some prescription that was primarily used to sleep assistance. He gave her information of the dose necessary to commit suicide. Diane decided to commit suicide and Dr. Quill diagnosis of death was Leukemia. Therefore, Diane did not do what she should be consider moral actions under the Kantian perspective because her maxim cannot become a universal law. Likewise, Dr. Quill did and did not did his best decision by
One of the most complex, ever-changing careers is the medical field. Physicians are not only faced with medical challenges, but also with ethical ones. In “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth”, by Susan Cullen and Margaret Klein, they discuss to great extent the complicated dilemmas physicians encounter during their practice. In their publication, Cullen and Klein discuss the pros and cons of disclosing the medical diagnosis (identifying the nature or cause of the disease), and the prognosis (the end result after treating the condition). But this subject is not easily regulated nor are there guidelines to follow. One example that clearly illustrates the ambiguity of the subject is when a patient is diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening
In certain situations it is difficult for a person to decide between a moral and immoral choice. In the field of health there are physicians and patients that may have two different mindsets. One may be a patient that believes a decision is moral, while a physician may think the decision is immoral. How can the physician stick to his beliefs and morals when he must make a choice to go against them or not?
After reading Should Doctors Tell the Truth by Joseph Collins, I started steer away from Collins views. I disagree with Collins thesis because it isn’t permissible to take control of anyone’s autonomy whether or not it’s in his or her best interest.
The article quotes this as the “worst type of preanalytical error”. The reason behind this is the result of this error means that a patient is treated for a disease or illness that they are not suffering from. This could be by medication or treatments even as extreme as chemotherapy. Problems that then grow from this is the effects of the treatment can be life threatening as they are managing a condition that isn’t there. An example of this is if a patient is incorrectly prescribed warfarin, an anticoagulant to treat blood clotting but has no issues with blood clotting the blood will thin and increase blood pressure leading to serious health defects.
I have been aware of medical errors for some time now. While in nursing school I have heard many stories from classmates and instructors of instances where people they knew, or loved ones had been either harmed or died because of a medical error. I have had experiences with medical errors. When I was in the hospital for the birth of my first child, the nurse that came to change out my IV bag did not check the
Healthcare providers must make their treatment decisions based on many determining factors, one of which is insurance reimbursement. Providers always consider whether or not the organization will be paid by the patients and/or insurance companies when providing care. Another important factor which affects the healthcare provider’s ability to provide the appropriate care is whether or not the patient has been truthful, if they have had access to health, and are willing to take the necessary steps to maintain their health.
Unfortunately stories like Sam Levine happen everyday. Is it morally ethical for doctors to know Sam Levine’s quality of life before he was admitted? Should that effect the care he receives? The best way to try and get a moral decision is by using the four principles, but first let us look back at the situation. Days ago Sam Levine was coherent enough to understand what medical care was being offered to him, but he quickly made a turn for the worst. When Sam originally decided that the medical staff use any means necessary to save his life, did he really thin about every scenario. Was every scenario giving to him by the healthcare professionals.
I watched Grey’s Anatomy Season 1 Episode 9, titled Who’s Zoomin Who. This episode starts off in a way that does relate to any ethical issue. George has just slept with a new girl and finds out that he has syphilis. The entire wing of the hospital experiences a syphilis outbreak leading the staff needing to be tested for the STD. Grey’s Anatomy has many storylines and another in this episode deals with the Chief of Surgery, Dr. Webber. He finds out that he has a tumor behind his eye, and he recruits Dr. Shepard to keep this secret and do the surgery to remove the tumor. Dr. Burke is also dealing with a friend who has an ovary that he needs to have removed.
... event arises and it was due to lack of assessment of genuine comprehension. I think the best system of obtain consent would incorporate a regulated system that accommodated each institution and their requirements, but also equally weighed the importance of true understanding of facts and realization of the patient’s capacity to make decisions. But even if this was established as standard practice, there would still be the issue of how the assessment is made and how accurate it is due to other influences i.e. current injury status or medications needed for full psychological and or conceptual functioning. There could also be an issue of how to regulate such a subjective issue; each physician is going to have different ethical views and this will inevitably influence how he/she assess the patient and their ability to make the best decisions concerning their health.
...iately discovered and the patient was fine, but had there been proper communication between the healthcare staff, such blunders could have been avoided altogether (Dolanksy, 2013).
When put inside an ethical dilemma, it is impossible to make a decision that everyone will agree is ethically sound. This is because different people have different methods of determining whether something is ethical or unethical. Different methods of evaluation exist because there are different opinions of what a better society would be like. Despite all these differences, decisions still have to be made when one is put in an ethical dilemma. The decision of the doctors in “The Serpent Was There” not to go public with their mistake was ethical.
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
Medical ethics could be so many different thing mostly bad.There's so many stories about medical ethics this this story about this girl. At the age of 13 she was diagnosed with a rare and fated type of cancer.The survived and was cleaned that didn't have cancer. Then 10 years later she fought for her life again, she had sergey. After the Surgery there was no where no sign of the cancer. There years later she married and she became pregnant because of her health history she went to a clinic so they could watch her pregnancy.She had to go back to the clinic for having a lung tumor. She want to be in the best health, surgery was not an option. Her baby was too small to be born yet ,” meaning too premature.” (Thornton )She wanted to keep treating her cancer but, the doctors said that should wait until 28 weeks.She waited and the doctors she it was too dangerous and they wouldn’t help.So they want to cort.The court made it distion and at time is was very ill. The court order a surguy but the doctor said that if she goes into surgery she might not make it. She refused, but the doctors could not refused the courts orders. She was rolled into the surgery room. she made it into through the surgery, but two days later she died. She ...