Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does self esteem influence the development of a child
The importance of self-esteem in child development
Determinants of intelligence according to heredity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
Intelligence is the ability to obtain and use knowledge and skills. Intelligence is what assists humans in thinking rationally, acting purposefully, and adapting to the environment. This is a broad description of intelligence. When it comes to specifying intelligence, there is much debate, especially when it comes to how to measure intelligence. There are IQ tests that produce a single intelligence. However, many argue that these tests are too vague and that these tests do not consider factors that play a role in an individual’s intelligence. While this is true, psychologists have used this test to conduct studies on what affects intelligence levels. Three significant factors that have been studied on and that are believed to
…show more content…
Some believe that this is because of heredity, which is the passing of traits from parents to children. While not completely being responsible for intelligence levels, genetic factors are believed to play a huge role in the intelligence of an individual. There have been studies conducted to understand how genes influence intelligence. The best example of a study that shows the relation between intelligence and heredity is the Bouchard twin study done by Thomas Bouchard. In this experiment, the IQ levels of identical twins who were raised apart and the IQ levels of identical twins who were raised together are compared. This allowed Bouchard to to see how much, if at all, heredity affects intelligence. The results of the experiment showed that the correlation of the IQ scores of identical twins who were raised together was .86. The identical twins who were raised apart had an IQ correlation of .72. While this seems to show that heredity greatly affects intelligence, psychologists argue that identical twins who were raised apart are still treated similar to their twin and that this study did not consider any external factors. However, this study has led psychologists to believe that heredity has an approximate 50 percent effect on …show more content…
Every culture has its own set of virtues, and each culture values different behaviors. So, this means that not every culture has the same concept of intelligence and values the same mental abilities. An IQ score of a student in the United States and the IQ score of a child in a West African tribe would differ because these two cultures vary greatly. Subcultures have to also be considered in this scenario. A subculture is a group of people in a culture that separate themselves from their culture by practicing their own values. Different types of subcultures would be those who live in poor communities, those who live in rural areas, and ethnic families. Because these groups have different situations and different values, their intelligence would vary. The differences in culture have so greatly affected IQ scores, that psychologists have tried to develop a culture-fair test. This is an intelligence test that minimizes the significance of skills and knowledge that may be more common in some cultures than others. However,there has yet been a test that has been created that has no cultural influences. Another problem with the culture theory is that there are many successful and smart people who come from different cultures. They say this is because it really depends on the person’s environment. While many psychologists argue over the concept of intelligence, many will agree that culture has an effect on levels of
In his article, “None of the Above: What IQ Doesn’t Tell You about Race” journalist Malcolm Gladwell refutes the notion that intelligence is based on genetics and argues that IQ is not just based on an individual’s level of thinking but also on the location where an individual resides. In 1984, James Flynn discovered that over the years, the IQ of people around the world had been increasing by three points per decade. This is now known as the Flynn effect. The IQ fundamentalists around the world believe that IQ score shows an individual’s level of thinking and it is based on genetics. However, Flynn effect disproves this
General intelligence tends to relate to various degrees with each other (Cohen 2012). An example of this is that if an individual is good in math, they may also be good in spelling. In this weeks reading we reviewed several different models of measurement of intelligence. In regard to these theories and general intelligence (g), the theories are various but have commonality and overlap. The Spearman's two-factor theory is if a test has high correlation with other test than the measurement of g is highly saturated (Cohen, 2012). The greater the importance of g on a test, the better the test is believed to predict intelligence
Intelligence tests have been developed by scientists as a tool to categorize army recruits or analyze school children. But still discussing what intelligence is, academics have a difficult time defining what intelligence tests should measure. According to the American researcher Thorndike, intelligence is only that what intelligence tests claim it is (Comer, Gould, & Furnham, 2013). Thus, depending on what is being researched in the test and depending on the scientist’s definition of intelligence the meaning of the word intelligence may vary a lot. This essay will discuss what intelligence is in order to be able to understand the intelligence theories and aims of intelligence tests.
interpreted as being caused by genetic or environmental differences among groups? A strong promoter of the belief that there is undoubtedly a racial difference in intelligence is Phillippe Rushton. As a professor of psychology, he argues that there is irrefutable scientific evidence of difference...
Author David Livermore defines cultural intelligence is as the “capability to function effectively in a variety of cultural contexts” (Livermore, 2011, p. 3). In order for achieving dimensional
In this world, there are many different individuals who are not only different in demographics but also different neurologically. Due to an immense amount of people it is important to first understand each individual, in order, to better understand them and to help them when it comes to certain areas such as education, the work force, and etc…. For this reason psychologists have aimed to further understand individuals through the use of psychological assessments. This paper aims to examine a particular assessment tool, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (Fifth Edition), which measures both intelligence and cognitive abilities (Roid, 2003). This assessment is usually administered by psychologists and the scores are most often used to determine placement in academics and services allotted to children and adolescents (despite their compatibility for adults) (Wilson & Gilmore, 2012). Furthermore before the investigation dives into the particulars of the test, such as its strengths and weakness’, it is best to first learn more about the intelligence scales general characteristics.
This is an essay about the different theories of intelligence; it will discuss which theory is best at determining intelligence in my opinion. The information provided will help describe the pros and cons of each of the theories being used to define intelligence, explain why is it important to assess children’s intelligence, and discuss the type of intelligence I possess. The different theories of intelligence are complex and understanding the elements of each can help an individual choose the one that they believe is the best for determining intelligence. Comparing the positive and the negative elements of each theory of intelligence will allow an individual to see both sides of the theory and the flaws that may be twisted
Most researchers believe that we are born with a certain intelligence or potential intelligence. They also believe that the intelligence we are born with is difficult to change. Psychologists use short-answer tests to assess one’s intelligence (Gardner papers). It was believed that intelligence was a single inherited thing. Human beings start out initially as a blank slate and could be trained to learn anything, provided that it was presented in an appropriate way (Multiple Intelligences and Education). Currently an “increasing number of researchers believe the opposite. Gardner defined intelligence as: “the ability to create an effective product or offer a service that is valued in culture; a set ...
Sir Francis (Galton, 1869) believed intelligence was inherited, and saw conceptualised general mental ability as a largely inheritable trait, and very much like physical traits, having a normal distribution in the population. Biologically, siblings share genes, and evidence shows that (Schacter, Gilbert & Wegner, 2012) intelligence test scores of siblings to be much more similar than the intelligence scores of unrelated people. Identical twins(monozygotic) share 100% DNA and studies show
Unfortunately, I do not have much experience with intelligence tests modern or otherwise so my answer will come from course material. I came across this statement which I found interesting “there is no shared agreement as to what intelligence is and how it should be measured” (Drummond & Jones, 2010, p. 173). Intelligence testing carries with it so much controversy, it also places limits on where people believe their place is in society. There are multiple factors that can affect the testing on a given day: fatigue, stress, heredity, socioeconomic status the list could on and on. The results of this test can be damming painting inaccurate self-images of people. On one hand people will attempt to achieve heights unattainable, conversely
One of the most definitive things ever said regarding the nature of intelligence was that intelligence is whatever IQ tests measure. The IQ test has been in use throughout the 20th century and serves as an accepted measure of a person’s intelligence. It is used by institutions such as schools and the army to screen people’s level of intelligence and decisions are made based on that. The IQ test consists of a series of questions regarding certain skills such as vocabulary, mathematics, spatial relations. The scores that a person gets on these tests depend on the amount of questions that a person answers correctly. The actual score that a person gets is dependant on how others in that age group do on those particular questions.
On the ‘nature’ side of the debate is the psychometric approach, considered to be the most dominant in the study of intelligence, which “inspired the most research and attracted the most attention” (Neisser et al. 1996, p. 77). It argues that there is one general (‘g’) factor which accounts for intelligence. In the 1880s, Francis Galton conducted many tests (measuring reaction times to cognitive tasks), (Boundless 2013), in order to scientifically measure intelligence. These tests were linked to the eugenic breeding programme, which aimed to eliminate biologically inferior people from society. Galton believed that as intelligence was inherited, social class or position were significant indicators of intelligence. If an individual was of high social standing, they would be more intelligent than those of a lower position. However he failed to show any consistency across the tests for this hypothesis, weakening his theory that social class correlated with intelligence. Nevertheless, his creation of the intelligence test led many to continue to develop...
Professor Bigot argues that intelligence is only influenced by nature, meaning it is entirely based in genetics, and that one's environment or surroundings can't influence it. However, Dr. Bigot's argument does have some truth to it. With the purpose of investigating the role of genetics in intelligence, researchers have approached twin studies. According to Bouchard and McGue (1981), the closer the biological relationship, the higher the IQ correlation is. This idea was the result of a meta-analysis of 111 studies of IQ correlations between siblings from research studies on intelligence. The Minnesota Twin Study (Bouchard et al. 1990) studies identical twins raised together and identical twins raised apart. Bouchard et al (1990) concluded that 70% of intelligence is associated to genetic inheritance. Therefore, 30% of intelligence may be attributed to other factors. Although the Minnesota Twin Study has been one of the most impressive twin studies carried out, there are several criticisms that test its validity. One of its greatest criticisms was the "equal environment assumption", which states that it can't be assumed that twins reared together are exposed to the same environment.
Intelligence is the cognitive ability to think, deal and rationalize new information, but what exactly determines whether someone is smarter than someone else? Well, many factors contribute to intelligence, such as education and heredity, but a major contributor is also socioeconomic status. In the popular 1994 publication The Bell Curve, socioeconomic status has been proven to have an effect on intelligence on lower-class households in poverty with implications with poor nutrition and health, violence, domestic problems, abuse and lack of a stimulating learning environment (pg.100). A proper nutritional diet during early childhood is essential for brain development.
Firstly it is difficult to measure the intelligence of people with different education, language or culture as the exam was prepared for. Secondly the school of thought that race had a link to intelligence falls apart when put under scrutiny and put into context. Third the Environment that we live in had changes dramatically and with it our Intellect has changed as well over time, and the twin’s dilemma although a very interesting research, need more context and a more broad variety of sample s before a conclusion can be made. All in all it seems that the theory of the way someone is raised affects intellect more that the circumstances of one’s