Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects on computers in everyday lives
Effects on computers in everyday lives
Effects on computers in everyday lives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects on computers in everyday lives
When I think of the word gatekeeping, what it comes to my mind is a person who works guarding a gate which has the responsibility of letting people in and out of the gate. I believe this analogy works the same when we talk about gatekeeping relating to ethical communication.
According to Neher and Sandin (2007) described that “The theory highlights the gatekeeping and framing functions managers of the media exercise in deciding what events and topics will be brought to the attention of the public” (p. 303). Gatekeeping, in the media, has the duty to inform the news to the public, and at the same time, he or she is the one who considered what to show to the public and what not to. Consequently, dilemmas such as what is appropriate for the public
…show more content…
For instance, Neher and Sandin (2007) said that “The Computer Ethics Institute, a Project of the Brookings Institution, established such a code of ethics that apply to communication technology. Being called the Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics” (p. 300). In my opinion, all the commandments have a significant importance, but for me, three of them stand out from the …show more content…
2007, p. 301). We can see in this sentence how the words USE and HARM are used to make a powerful statement. The importance of these words has a significant relationship with Technology Communication because nowadays, we use computers as a way to communicate with people. For instance, we use computers when we send or read emails, or when we use social media websites like Facebook to communicate with friends and family. Now, the responsibilities that imply on how we use computers is a dilemma or concern for a lot of people. The harm we can cause to people through this way of communication can be a catastrophe. Since every time we chat or read emails, we do not have a face to face contact with the other people. People can find a way to harm others. For instance, they can send emails or post false statements about a person only with the purpose to ruin the reputation of others. A problem like this can be irrelevant for others, but for some people can be a cause of depression and possible a psychological illness. The way on how people use computers has to be an important matter for individuals and organizations in
In “Reporting the News” by George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Robert L. Lineberry, the main idea is how the media determines what to air, where to get said stories that will air, how the media presents the news, and the medias effect on the general public. “Reporting The News” is a very strong and detailed article. The authors’ purpose is to inform the readers of what goes on in the news media. This can be inferred by the authors’ tone. The authors’ overall tone is critical of the topics that are covered. The tone can be determined by the authors’ strong use of transitions, specific examples, and phrases or words that indicate analysis. To summarize, first, the authors’ indicate that the media chooses its stories that will air
Mostly gatekeeping bias is used in some of the big and important news but what gatekeeping is when releasing the story or keeping some information under the wraps. This occurs very often because media does inform the public the truth but decides to keep certain truth and not real ease it to the public. Another big type of bias in the media coverage bias which basically is when the media decides to cover a news but only talk about or covers certain parts to make their audience understand what they want the audience to understand. The media is suppose to tell the truth but now it the total opposite. Bias is everywhere and the media is no longer the helpful and trustworthy way to learn what is happening around the world. It been like this for a long time but no one has talked about bias because the media controls what happens and what gets to the public. Of course the media can't control when people in the media talk how bias occurs for example like Goldberg and knowing bias exist everywhere in the
The internet’s interconnectivity has undoubtedly allowed for easier forms of communication; nevertheless, it also has exponentially increased the misuse of communication between its users. As Ha Jin’s “The Bane of the internet” exemplifies, the same factors that facilitate conveyance, can spoil the quality and rapport between its users and develop negative unhealthy
According to Mackay (2009, p. 466), Agenda setting theory suggests that the media has the ability to influence the public’s way of thinking through the topics that are covered. If a news item is more prominently covered, it is thought that
With the entry of technology, humankind built up the capacity to communicate around the world. However, there were many debates whether technology changed the way of socializing with people. Despite the fact that technology has its positive sides, it ought to be found in a negative light. As technology made people's lives easier, they lost their social skills. The problem is that Nowadays' generation is failing to understand the epidemic of communicating via internet and its side effects.
The articles “How Computers Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle and “Electronic Intimacy” by Christine Rosen argue that technology is quite damaging to society as a whole and that even though it can at times be helpful it is more damaging. I have to agree and disagree with this because it really just depends on how it is used and it can damage or help the user.The progressing changes in technology, like social media, can both push us, as a society, further and closer to and from each other and personal connections because it has become a tool that can be manipulated to help or hurt our relationships and us as human beings who are capable of more with and without technology.
For instance, the online article “Television News: Are we Amusing Ourselves to Death?” by John W. Whitehead, John quoted, “Although the news items spoon-fed to you may have some value, they are primarily a commodity to gather an audience, which will in turn to be sold to advertisers. Most people, believing themselves to be in control of their media consumption, are not really bothered by this. But TV is a two-way attack: it not only delivers programming to your home, it also delivers you (the consumer) to a sponsor”. John’s report demonstrates how companies’ influence has negatively impacted television network by using commercial to gain attention from the viewers to keep consumers glued to the screen. Another form of corporate influence on news network is news network attempting to appease corporate sponsor by not resisting person with dynamism and domination. For example, the article “Democracy Now! Decolonising US News Media” by Kevin Howley, Kevin quoted, “Anxious to avoid antagonizing commercial interests or government news sources, journalists rarely challenge people in positions of power and authority for fear of losing access to “official sources.” Instead, working journalists play it safe by taking a less confrontational stance toward elites, pursuing instead the sensational, the titillating or the trivial news item. Thus, journalists create the illusion of conflict and controversy by covering relatively inconsequential “news items” like celebrity gossip, or the sexual misconduct of politicians, while studiously avoiding substantive public policy issues”. The quote written by Kevin represents how news reporters are forced to appease the sponsor by reporting on emotional news event over significant social issues in order to please the sponsor. As a result, audience only obtains information on minor news, preventing people
Using everything more than its recommended doses have side effects, and the same is for the use of our technology. The use of technology and its accelerated innovation in our societies is affecting our life form different angles. From making disincentive our kids about valance, school shooting, lake of sexual boundaries, depression, lake of educational stander and so much more are all caused by the overuse of technology. After making my research questions, and reading the articles about the overuse and said effect of technology for my annotated bibliography, I will be able to present my research paper about the harms’ of technology and internet. My thesis will focus on the negative sid...
Ethical standards that evolved over the history of Western civilization deal with interpersonal relationships. What is right or wrong? What one should do and not do when dealing with other people. Ethical behavior in a business environment has not been as clearly defined. When businesses were small and the property of a few individuals, traditional ethical standards were applied to meet different situations. However, as businesses became larger, the interpersonal ethical relations did not provide any clear behavioral guidelines. Likewise, the principles of ethical relationships were even less pertinent to the corporate environments.
GateKeeping is the control over the selection of content treated by the media usually thought to be in the hands of a few news editors who act as guardians of the information. Basically they are the people who determine the stories and information we get to hear. I would say that the gatekeeper at Fox News is Rupert Murdoch and his team because he is the founder at Fox News and he owns so much of the media that his team has to be the one making the calls on what type of news they want to talk about. The film shows gatekeeping in the works when they show the memos that Fox News sends out discussing what the anchors are and aren't allowed to talk about and how they should talk about certain topics. For example when one of the memos stated “Let’s refer to the U.S Marines we see in the foregrounds as “sharpshooters” not snipers, which carries a negative connotation" That right there shows how they manipulate the words they say to get the information to come out exactly how they want the viewers to perceive it just by changing one word. By doing things like that it twists all the facts and gives people the wrong idea
“Through the ongoing interaction of theorizing and empirical research consistent with the scientific method, agenda-setting theory has evolved from a tightly focused perspective to a broad theory. Initially, the focus was on the way media affect the public’s view of which issues are important. Later the theory broadened to encompass five distinct aspects of public life: basic and attribute agenda-setting effects, the psychology of these processes, and the consequences of these effects for opinions and behavior. The participation of scholars worldwide has been central to the continuing productivity of the theory” (Maxwell McCombs).
Shoemaker, PJ 1996, ‘Media Gatekeeping’, in Salwen MB & Stack DW (eds), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, New Jersey, pp. 79 – 91.
Salwen, M. B. (1987). Mass Media Issue Dependency and Agenda Setting. Communication Research Reports, 4(1), 26-31.
In our democratic society, mass media is the driving force of public opinion. Media sources such as Internet, newspaper, news-broadcasts, etc, play significant roles in shaping a person’s understanding and perception about the events occurred in our daily lives. As long as the newspapers, internet, network television, etc, continued to be easily accessible to the public, the media will continue to have an influence in shaping its opinions. Factors such as agenda-setting, framing and priming help shape the public opinions. Agenda-setting is when the media focuses their attention on selected issues on which the public will form opinion on, whereas framing allows the media to select certain aspects about the problem and then make them appear more salient. Similarly, priming works by repeatedly exposing certain issues to public. As the issues get more exposure, the individual will be more likely to recall or retain the information in their minds. This paper will discuss these three factors played out systemically by media and how our opinions are constantly being influence and shape by them.
First of all, people that use technology everyday makes them fall into the risks of infidelity, peer pressure, or mainly bullying. In order to comprehend this factor, a person should indicate the corruptions of overusing technology, and how is has harmed our society today. According to research conducted by Larry D. Rosen, PhD, a professor a...