Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion in the media
Influence of TV in society
Influence of TV in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
RTM is fully owned by the government. It has 2 channels, TV1 and TV2, both known as a prime channel and golden channel respectively (Khattab 2006). By the sense of the ownership, Khattab (2006) analyzed how RTM set the agenda in delivering their news and how they include the content in those TV channels. It is obvious that the agenda set by RTM is explicit. From Khattab’s explanation about the agenda, the implicit action or the underlying meaning of the explicit actions can be analyzed. RTM in their TV1, majorly cover sports events such the Olympics and the upcoming FIFA World Cup 2014 in Brazil. They also highlighted the Mecca pilgrimage during the Hajj (Khattab 2006). Plus, they broadcast the Friday prayers every week at the National Mosque …show more content…
RTM also has the intention to promote the interest of the ruling party by covering major news reports about the party. According to Masterman (2001, p. 5):
Seizure of radio and television stations, the telecommunications net and mass production newspapers is an immediate imperative in every coup or revolution. Symbolically and practically, this act sums up the role of information in maintaining or overthrowing a social system. In a fundamental sense, control over the means of informing people is the basis of the political power – whether those means be the mass media of communication, informal political education, or the barrel of a gun. As Alfred Sauvy put it, the power to build television stations is like medieval power to build castles along the Rhine. The agenda set by RTM is effective to the Malay and Bumiputera people. They are the one who watches TV1. There is no criticism from the public of TV1 fully prioritize their programs in Malay language because there is TV2 that has the role in using other languages to deliver their messages. Of course, the initiative of RTM to broadcast the Friday prayers live is fully supported by the Muslims. There is no way for someone to disagree to an Islamic TV
…show more content…
75, no. 7, pp. 636 – 652.
Cha, H & Yang, SU 2011, ‘Corporate Reputation and the News Media in South Korea’, in Carroll CE (eds), Corporate Reputation and the News Media Agenda-Setting within Business News Coverage in Developed, Emerging, and Frontier Markets, Routledge, New York, pp. 340 – 362.
Carroll, CE 2011, ‘International Perspectives on Agenda-Setting Theory Applied to Business News', in Carroll CE (eds), Corporate Reputation and the News Media Agenda Setting within Business News Coverage in Developed Emerging, and Frontier Markets, Routledge, New York, pp. 1 – 14.
Deng, LF 2011, ‘Corporate Reputation and the News Media in China’, in Carroll CE (eds), Corporate Reputation and the News Media Agenda-Setting within Business News Coverage in Developed Emerging, and Frontier Markets, Routledge, New York, pp. 293 – 315.
Fong, YL & Ahmad Ishak, MS 2014, ‘Framing interethnic conflict in Malaysia: A comparative analysis of newspapers coverage on the keris polemics’, Ethnicities, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 252 –
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
Epstein, Edward J. News From Nowhere: Television and the News, Vintage, New York NY. 1973, pp. 16; Pearson, David. “The Media and Government Deception.” Propaganda Review. Spring 1989, pp. 6-11.
“Constructing Canada: Do we need a public broadcaster to enhance democracy?” written by David Taras, a professor at the University of Calgary and director of Alberta Global Forum. Taras reinstates the turning point of Canada Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and their relationship with the Canadian parliament. He addressed on the developments and struggles Public Service Broadcasters (PSB), specifically CBC, encounter in order to continue to telecast. Lastly, he explains that PSB has a major role in maintaining the balance of power between the government and the mass media. PSB were created by the public for the public because a democracy can only happen if everyone cooperates.
Through the efforts of globalization, television has grown to be more than just a source for the facts. Presently, television cable channel stations seem to be more interested in capturing viewers interest and ratings than reporting the most significant events of the day. More than likely, without thinking about it, viewers fail to recall that cable network stations are in the business of making money first, then attempting to keep the public “infotained”. In other words, keeping you well informed with quality news broadcasting while simultaneously entertaining you at the same time.
Mass Media. Ed. William Dudley. Farmington Hills, MI: Thompson Gale, 2005. 121-130.
Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Milan, S. (2012). Media/society (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
One way in which government achieves this objective, is by its ability to misuse the media’s ability to set the agenda. Contrary to popular belief, media is in fact an enormous hegemony. In fact, separate independent news organizations do not exist. Rather than creating an independent structured agenda of their own, generally lesser smaller news organizations adapt to a prepared agenda, previously constructed by a higher medium. Based upon this information alone, it is quite apparent that media functions in adherence to the characteristics of a hierarchy.
During these difficult economic times sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have taken over our T.V and internet screens as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a sort of escapism for readers. Although it may seem that sensationalism has just started making waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has been influencing viewers and contributing to media bias since the days of the penny press. Sensationalisms long history has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential to today’s reporting practices. With the influence over readers’ sensationalism’s media bias have and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come.
“Through the ongoing interaction of theorizing and empirical research consistent with the scientific method, agenda-setting theory has evolved from a tightly focused perspective to a broad theory. Initially, the focus was on the way media affect the public’s view of which issues are important. Later the theory broadened to encompass five distinct aspects of public life: basic and attribute agenda-setting effects, the psychology of these processes, and the consequences of these effects for opinions and behavior. The participation of scholars worldwide has been central to the continuing productivity of the theory” (Maxwell McCombs).
O’Shaughnessy, M., Stadler, J. (2009)Media and Society: An introduction. Dominant Ideology and Hegemony. London: Oxford.
In recent years, the importance of news broadcasts has increased. More people need to access the news to stay in touch with the rest of the world’s affairs. More TV channels have developed to give viewers more news. Both commercial and government networks are used to present the news to the general public. However, because of the different fundings and target audiences, different networks will focus on different aspects of the news, to make as many people of their target audience watch their particular broadcast. Therefore the separate channels can bring in a far larger audience, and take away another channels audience, therefore reducing competition.
According to Mehrotra (2011), media sensationalism is defined as “style of reporting news to public which involves use of fear, anger, excitement and crude thrill undertaken by the media to increase the viewership, ratings and lastly profits”. Moreover, this technique is used for two reasons: first to increase the rate of the viewers, and the second is to persuade the viewer that the solution for the suggested fear will be demonstrated in the news story. (Serani, 2011) .Additionally, the key to the success of sensational based news is in presenting the news in a sensational - fearful anecdote format instead of scientific facts. Thus, the media is promoting inaccurate news as the reports are aired without fact checking and based on sensationalism rather than on accurate facts. Hence, this style of reporting inaccurate news has hazardous effects on ...
The media is an institution that works through the circular process. We tell it what is important to us, and it tells us what we should deem as important. The media is an institution, run by the people for the people, that keep us informed. It brings us stories from distant places and reveals to us what we can not personally witness. The all powerful media is a huge part of our lives. With all of this in mind, we must consider the process of agenda setting. A process which is used unrelentlessly on television.
Mass media, over the years, has had a profound effect on American society, on its
India has the largest democracy in the world and media has a powerful presence in the country. In recent times, Indian media has been subject to a lot of criticism for the manner in which they have disregarded their social responsibility. Dangerous business practices in the field of media have affected the fabric of Indian democracy. Big industrial conglomerates in the business of media have threatened the existence of pluralistic viewpoints. Post liberalisation, transnational media organisations have spread their wings in the Indian market with their own global interests. This has happened at the cost of an Indian media which was initially thought to be an agent of ushering in social change through developmental programs directed at the non-privileged and marginalised sections of the society. Though media has at times successfully played the role of a watchdog of the government functionaries and has also aided in participatory