Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on disobedience
An essay on disobedience
An essay on the consequences of disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on disobedience
Oscar Wilde, an Irish author, once suggested that if one were to ever look at the discourse of history, they would find that disobedience is man’s original virtue, and through disobedience social progress is made. The study of history is the study of social progress. Social progressions are the changes that occur in society that progress or improve social, political, and economic structures. Social progress can be achieved in several ways, but just like Oscar Wilde, I believe that disobedience is a valuable human trait that just so happens to be a huge part in the progression our society has made and continues to make. When social progress is defined, the first thing that comes to mind is the Civil Rights Movement- the fight against …show more content…
Slavery itself is an institution disobeying any somewhat sane or decent man’s ethical boundaries. But instead of looking at slavery as an institution right now, I will zoom into a certain one slave. Colson Whitehead’s the Underground Railroad is a story about a slave named Cora. She lives on a plantation with brutal owners as enforcers and an inevitable life not well-spent ahead of her. Slavery itself had made-up rules that were implied to all and rules that varied from plantation to plantation. One obvious, and important rule of slavery- do not run away from your owner. Because Cora knew that her life on the plantation would be an continuous downhill tumble, she decided that taking a chance on an escape would be her hope for a decent future. Whitehead explained Cora’s struggles and setbacks on her way out of the possession of another human. Cora lost friends on the way, gained enemies, and was near death many times on this journey. In the end, Cora’s disobedience payed off. She was no longer a possession of another human being and was no longer being dehumanized. Cora proves Oscar Wilde’s point that disobedience results in social progress. Cora created social progress by increasing the number of free blacks and decreasing the number of enslaved ones. Cora was one of many that pushed equal rights among race using disobedience as a …show more content…
Disobedience in the sense that one is rationally disobeying someone or something because they believe it will result in improvement of the greater good is the valuable human trait Wilde is talking about. Looking at history, we saw that the major event in the Civil Rights Movement were ones of civil disobedience. We saw that civil disobedience can lead to the freedom of a country. Think about what you have done to progress society. Think about what you haven’t done. And, think about what you can do. Simple acts of disobedience for a good cause can result in progress that can change the lives of many. Remember, civil disobedience is
According to Oscar Wilde, disobedience is a valuable human trait that promotes social progress. Civil disobedience allows for the unification of various groups to fight towards a common goal, often resulting in change. Historically, there has been much evidence supporting Wilde’s claim. Significant examples of disobedience that led to social progress include the Boston Tea Party, the Salt March, and the Civil Rights Movement.
One of the greatest feelings in the world is going against the grain of society and the universal fear to be different than the rest. Whether you are sparked by your own fire, or someone else’s, breaking the status quo to be diverse enhances progress. Oscar Wilde once said, “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.” This quote sparks interest due to disobedience often containing a negative connotation. However, in this quote disobedience is honorable, and to be called disobedient is a compliment. According to Wilde, disobedience is beneficial and without it, social progress could not be made. Without
“No radical change on the plane of history is possible without crime,” This quote from Hermann Keyserling is just one of many statements that help describe the meaning and true raw power of Civil Disobedience. Civil disobedience as defined by Merriam Webster is the “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government”. The most promising and understandable of the definitions of Civil Disobedience would be that given to us by Gandhi from India “Compassion in the form of respectful disagreement”. Even the Veterans Fast for Life from here in the United States must agree when saying, “when leaders act contrary to conscience, we must act contrary to leaders.” To understand why civil disobedience is so important in our lives you must first look into your heart and realize that the integrity of mankind has no need of rules.
In 1968, Martin Luther King Jr passed away from a sniper’s bullet. He gave us thirteen years of nonviolent protest during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. Before I can give my opinion on the history of race relations in the United States since King’s assassination in 1968 strengthened or weakened his arguments on the necessity and value of civil disobedience? You should know the meaning of civil disobedience. The word civil has several definitions. “The one that is intended in this case is "relating to citizens and their interrelations with one another or with the state", and so civil disobedience means "disobedience to the state". Sometimes people assume that civil in this case means "observing accepted social forms; polite" which would make civil disobedience something like polite, orderly disobedience. Although this is an acceptable dictionary definition of the word civil, it is not what is intended here. This misinterpretation is one reason the essay (by Henry David Thoreau that was first published in 1849) is sometimes considered to be an argument for pacifism or for exclusively nonviolent resistance”.
Why partake in civil disobedience? Oscar Wilde, an influential author, has an opinion on utilization of civil disobedience. “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion. Meaning, if a person wants to change society and its actions, they must rebel against the governing body in order to create effective alterations. Many situations exist where civil disobedience advocates change. In those situations, people have rights for disobedience, but must realize consequences may result from their disobedient actions.
Civil disobedience has been around for a long time. In Bible times Christians would disobey laws that would go against their beliefs, such as the law that they couldn’t preach. (Acts 4) Christians still disobey laws in many countries that do not let them practice their faith, some end up in jail or killed.
By definition, civil disobedience means to actively refuse to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government or of an occupying power without resorting to physical violence (Wikipedia 2007). Many of the influential people in history have felt passionately about what they believe. These passions caused them to rebel against a government or authority. Many times they felt so strongly about what they believed and how they were being treated was wrong they became disobedient. They would take physical and verbal abuse for being disobedient but would never retaliate. They believed in what they thought was wrong and tried to change the way they were governed. Albert Einstein once said 'never do anything against conscience even if the state demands it.' Albert Einstein's views seem to be reasonable. The claim by Albert Einstein is accurate because people should stand up for what they believe, they should know when they are right and their government is wrong, and they should trust in themselves and their own beliefs.
(An analysis of how Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau has impacted people through time.)
It can be seen in history and modern society that people have opposing opinions on disobedience. As a result some people believe that we should always live by the rules put in place while others believe they need to fight for change through disobedience. Author Oscar Wilde thought that disobedience is a virtue because it helped progress societies and causes social reform. Something is virtuous when it helps others and shows strong morals. Disobedience is when people does not follow the rules that are in place. Social reform is the progression of societies to improve them for the citizens.Disobedience is a virtue considering it allows people to fight for what they believe and cause social progress.
Following any kind of authority with dishonest morals is wrong. In the writings “Disobedience As A Psychological And Moral Problem” by Eric Fromm, “Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram and “Fourteen Defining Characteristics of Fascism” by Lawrence Britt they speak on similar principles of obedience by using observations and experiments. These experiments and concepts proved that most people unthinkingly follow orders from authoritative figures just by their social influence. The person being obedience to the autorotative figure must identify rational and irrational authority because can lead to unjustifiable treatment of the population, therefore people should be aware that blind obedience is a major threat to
Civil Disobedience is one using their freedom to express how they feel. How could it negatively impact a free society, when society is the thing that gave them the freedom to peacefully resist. It is only when the people’s reaction to peaceful resistance becomes violent does it begin to negatively impact a free society. When the Freedom Riders choose to peacefully protest by riding the buses, they made a statement. They did not want to fight with the hands, but rather with their actions. Even when the were met with cruel violence in Alabama, they continued to remain peaceful, and chose not strike back. This showed the world that peaceful resistance was possible, and it’s impact of society only depended on how people reacted to it.
In physics class, students learn all about Newton’s first law which states that an object at rest will stay at rest while an object in motion will stay in motion unless it is acted upon by a force. So, it shouldn't be a surprise that we the students, believe that civil disobedience is necessary to keep America great. If we the students apply Newton's first law to our world, as the Enlightenment encouraged, we can see that only by applying a force can change occur. Likewise, it is only through civil disobedience and peaceful resistance to laws that can change the course and society and propel social progress for humanity as a whole.
There is no doubt that throughout history of the world, we have seen disobedience, both for good causes and for bad. But the question of whether disobedience is necessary for social progress and societal development as a whole is multifaceted, like the human race itself. While Wilde is correct in that disobedience and rebellion can lead to immense social progress, one must also see the flaws in this ambiguous argument, and we must ask the question, “how far is too far?”
I'm aware that Oscar Wilde is claiming that “man’s original virtue,” disobedience, even rebellion, is a valuable trait which promotes social progress. I'm aware that the word disobedience, doing something good at first, is difficult to imagine, but unless one goes deeper and takes account of history, Wilde’s claim will always seem as invalid.
Obedience has always been in society. It is how we live our everyday lives. It is how we drive on roads everyday. It is how people are to walk on sidewalks rather than the streets themselves. How people accept certain authority and how they take it seriously determines if people would obey law/rules, and that means to what extent they would do so. Luke seemed as a regular man. He was drunk at the time of when he cut of the heads off of parking meters. And so he was then directed to pay the consequence of what he did in that moment, which was getting arrested for his wrong doings. Luke was then sentenced to prison in Florida. Upon arrival, Luke made the prison seem awfully unappealing. He made the prison seem like somewhere he did not want to