Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding and Coping with Change
Initiating and managing change
Leading and managing change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding and Coping with Change
Managing a staff can be hard for anyone because it adds on an enormous amount of stress. Managing your own staff can also be rewarding to you and the employees. You begin to build lifelong connections with your employees and you gain a lot of different skills and abilities. Sometimes it can come with some negatives as well such as difficult employees, changes within the organization and even a facility change. Change is good but can be hard for some people to adjust too. It makes them feel uncomfortable because they now have to step out of their comfort zone. Change can add a lot of beneficial factors both positive and negative. Sometimes something can be positive for the organization and negative for the staff. There are four basic functions …show more content…
54). My department is relocating to a new facility and not all of my staff is happy about it, some are even threatening to leave. I have some plans in mind to help make things better for everyone including myself. Adjusting to change can be a very difficult thing. First, I am going to create a detailed plan that I am going to need in order to achieve the two goals for my organization. The first goal is to help all of my current employees make a smooth and plentiful transition into the new facility. This is going to show them that the move is going to be beneficial for everyone. The second goal is to help accommodate all of the new employees that are coming on board. This goal is essential because the volume of work is going to be doubling. Just by participating in these two activities, this will help to convince my employees to stick around. I will also be making a new policy that will be effective immediately once the relocation is …show more content…
Employees can feel a sense of doubt in moving or making changes to the current processes. The four basic functions of management can be beneficial for everyone in the department if done correctly. Sometimes you have to reassure someone that things are going to work out for the better in order to keep him or her around. Employees threaten to quit and that is not something that you do not want. You want people to feel comfortable and be happy in what they are doing but you also want to make necessary changes to enhance the business and performance of all employees. Everyone will gain knowledge and experience from this and this will be beneficial in their future endeavors. Once again the four basic functions of management are: planning, organizing, directing, and
Change is a word that I have constantly heard throughout my high school years. It is a transformation through which everyone goes whether it's for the better or for the worse. For me the meaning and value of change has helped me to focus on the goals I have to accomplish. For others, it is simply just a phase we go through. All of us here have been able to learn and develop from our changes to be come a better and successful person.
In March, my PSYC class was presented with a challenge - to identify a personal improvement goal and to address this issue using an Immunity to Change map. My lengthy list of personal struggles was quickly narrowed down to one item with focused reflection. My improvement goal was to engage in productive thoughts and behaviors that would provide better time management practices. I was initially looking to improve my behaviors at home so that it would translate into success in all areas of my life including my career. With thoughtful observation and consideration, the Immunity to Change (ITC) map provided a developmentally raw process that continues to help me focus on my improvement goal today. Although I am still working on this goal, this process created more opportunities to make significant development changes above and beyond my initial intentions.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Organizations do not change, people do (Sullivan and Decker, 2009). A manager’s responsibility is to manage people. Change is difficult for most people and managing through the change process is not an easy task. Many theories on managing change exist, but they basically have four elements: assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). A manager’s role is to examine each of these elements and apply them to the people that he or she leads.
Introducing a new concept of work practice to an organization means changes have to occur in order to accommodate it. This would lead to organizational changes and may disrupt work patterns. Often, a change is necessary if an organization means to be competitive, and unless new ways and methods are developed and introduced, an organization may find itself lagging and not competitive. Benchmarking is one of those concepts that aim to improve work practices and achieve optimum results. Because change can bring negative connotations, it is important to take careful steps to effect change without major disruption to employees who would, more likely, be resistant to a new concept that may threaten their work comfort zone. So, effective communication, team building, offering support and being patient by allowing time for adaptation are very important steps in implementing change.
Managers have five major functions to perform, namely planning, staffing, organizing, controlling, and coordinating. These roles or functions of the management separate management from other roles such as marketing and accounting among others. The lessons that I have currently learned will help me in becoming a manager who will be capable of making various decisions that will have an impact on the whole firm. Additionally, the area where I have much interest in is the function of controlling in management.
Whenever I perceive change to be necessary the words of one of my past professors rings in my ears, “Stop the world and fix it”, a motto that I have stood by many times as a form of encouragement to ignite change in myself or my environment. A particular experience comes to mind when I think about necessary change and this change was personal, something I needed to change about myself. During my freshman year of college I moved in with seven of my closest friends. Not only is living with seven other people difficult, but when I started to slowly drift away from them things became even more challenging. I was pulling back into my own world and disregarding them as individuals that I had once trusted with my life. The situation at hand was definitely a fault of the whole group, but I knew my personal contribution to the situation was not helping because I did not view myself as the problem. I viewed my friends as the perpetrators of my friendship and loyalty. As we began to further drift apart, less words were exchanged, and loneliness began to creep in and I finally realized a change needed to happen. Friendships are not
It is necessary for these managers to assure that their employees know what is expected of them. They also need to effectively communicate the company goals and strategies in addition to frequently giving feedback to their employees. Managers also need to have the confidence in their employees to allow them autonomy in their work roles.
It is important to identify some of the problems an organization may have and go in and analyze them. There are many techniques that can be approached to help gain businesses people side of management like improving rapid response to customer service needs, low employee output, and costs. Change is not easy for some people, so making sure employees understand why change is needed helps people to become more aware and have the time to adjust or process those changes.
The four functions of management include: planning, management, leading and controlling. Internal factors impacted the PLOC in many different ways. Everything internal and external for this company deals with planning, organizing, leading and controlling, as it is the foundation for any management team.
There are four different functions of management. In this paper, I will define these functions; planning, organizing, leading and controlling. I will also explain how each of these functions relates to my own organization. Bateman and Snell (2004) define management as the process of working with people and resources to accomplish organizational goals. By utilizing the four different functions of management companies can work with their employees and other resources to reach the organizations goals.
“Management is the process of working with people and resources to accomplish organizational goals. Good managers do those things both effectively and efficiently.” (Bateman & Snell, 2004). Management contains four basic functions; planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. By using these four functions, one can create an organization both successfully and proficiently. Planning is specifying the goals to be achieved and deciding in advance the appropriate actions needed to achieve those goals. Planning sets the stage for actions and for major achievements. Organizing is assembling and coordinating the human, financial, physical, informational, and other resources needed to achieve goals. Organizing attracts people to the organizations, specifying job responsibilities, grouping jobs into work units, marshaling and allocating resources, and creating conditions so that people and things work together to achieve maximum success. Leading is directing, motivating,...
Also, it can be a tough and often thankless job. You may have to deal with a variety of personalities and often have to make do with limited resources. It can be a challenge to motivate workers in the face of uncertainty and chaos. And managers may find it difficult to effectively blend the knowledge, skills, ambitions, and experiences of a diverse group of employees. Finally, as a manager, success typically depends on others’ work performance.
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
function, managers need to analyse how activities and resources are to be grouped and carry out plans successfully (Bartol 2007). A manager have to understand their ability to manage the lower level employee which is the most valuable of the company as they are the key of output and implement in the planning. Then manager will coordinate the jobs between authority and responsibility that is to define the role position of them (MSG 2012).