Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women depicted in art
Women in pictorial history have often been used as objects; figures that passively exist for visual consumption or as catalyst for male protagonists. Anne Hollander in her book Fabric of Vision takes the idea of women as objects to a new level in her chapter “Women as Dress”. Hollander presents the reader with an argument that beginning in the mid 19th century artists created women that ceased to exist outside of their elegantly dressed state. These women, Hollander argues, have no body, only dress. This concept, while persuasive, is lacking footing which I will attempt to provide in the following essay. In order to do this, the work of James Tissot (b. 1836 d. 1902) will further cement the idea of “women as dress” while the work of Berthe …show more content…
In the case of Tissot’s The Lady in Pink, her dress is not for public as in “general public” like one might think. Rather this dress is referred to as an “indoor” dress, a dress that would not be worn out on the streets but for entertaining guest. Unlike the pink peignoir of Manet’s Young Lady from 1866 (fig. 2), Tissot’s figure is adorned in the most in-demand fashion of the time. While Manet’s young lady is presented to us in her dressing gown, Tissot’s young lady is in an elaborate gown donned with metallic elements which were made to be seen. Tissot’s lady in pink is not dressed to aid in her own private reflection, but dressed for the viewer’s consumption. Hollander continues her argument by presenting the reader with more images women in private spaces, having private thoughts while wearing public dress. The idea that these women are so comfortable in these corseted, elaborate garments, that even private contemplation cannot separate them from dress, leaves the viewer with the impression that these women have no other state of being. Hollander’s conflation of private moments with public dress makes it clear why she avoided including Tissot in her …show more content…
The unchanged splendor of their toilettes and the opulence of their flesh signified the social status and the monetary power of their fathers, husbands, or lovers, who amassed wealth but did not exhibit it.”
This practice is made clear in Tissot’s painting, The Political Lady (fig. 3) from 1883-5.
Despite the crowded composition, the central figure demands all of the viewers attention The young woman is being escorted by an older gentleman, whose face we cannot see, but whose white hair gives away his age. Her face is turned to the left and back, casting a shadow as if she is looking at something. What catches her gaze, we don’t know, nor does it really matter. Her side glace and slight smile invites the viewer to take in the spectacle.
If there is any confusion that the young woman in pink is supposed to be a spectacle, one only needs to look at the other figures within the canvas. Male figures appear to be both whispering and watching the young woman; she is on display. One male figure, placed in the middle left almost off the canvas, looks directly out of the canvas to the viewer as a reminder that we too are reveling in the
By this concept the author means that it was common for artists during the sixteenth-century to make artworks where the subject matter is about prostitution, brothels, and procuresses (Hofrichter 3). Frima Fox mentions that not only was Leyster’s perspective different from her compatriots, but also her behavior towards the subject (Hofrichter 4). The main point of view presented in this article that the author, Frima, is looking at is Leyster’s attitude toward prostitution. The author believes that Judith Leyster’s painting displays her standpoint as a woman of virtue, which is visibly portrayed in Judith’s artwork, where the woman is dressed formally and is ignoring the man’s offer (Hofrichter 6). Waiting for a response of the woman sewing, the scene is described as a silent and intimate propositional scene, which was not brought up again until 25 years later when Gerard Ter Borch was present (Hofrichter 7). The author trusts the influence of Judith Leyster’s Proposition on other artists, like Metsu and Vermeer, whose works show a similar concept of a woman being disturbed by a male figure and the silent mood of proposition in painting (Hofrichter
Working at her father’s clothing shop, she became very knowledgeable about expensive textiles and embellishments, which were captured in her works later in career. She was able to capture the beauty and lavishness of fabrics in portraits of aristocratic women.
Aristotle once claimed that, “The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance.” Artists, such as Louise-Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun and Mary Cassatt, captured not only the way things physically appeared on the outside, but also the emotions that were transpiring on the inside. A part no always visible to the viewer. While both artists, Le Brun and Cassatt, worked within the perimeters of their artistic cultures --the 18th century in which female artists were excluded and the 19th century, in which women were artistically limited-- they were able to capture the loving relationship between mother and child, but in works such as Marie Antoinette and Her Children and Mother Nursing her Child 1898,
She did not want people to feel uncomfortable or displeased with her art, she wanted them to feel content, orderly, and natural. Berthe Morisot’s The Dress Making Lesson; Le lecon De Couture (1884), depicts a mother teaching her child how to sow. “Morisot’s representation of women’s lives in the suburb of Passy play their part in establishing and maintaining the meanings of such social systems” (Adler). Teaching a child to sow is living within the society’s boundaries of what women are supposed to do and know, and that is exactly what Morisot wanted to portray. Morisot maintained her motherhood paintings very traditional and eye
As the art world moved away from Renaissance ideals, the way women were shown in the art world began to shift. In 1863, the french painter Edouard Manet used Venus of Urbino as inspiration for his radical painting Olympia, in which he challenged the limited way women were depicted in art. For one thing, he paints a prostitute, rather than an aristocrat. He paints a prostitute who is unashamed of her work, and unwilling to conform to classically idealized form. Even more radical however, is the way he painted her. Olympia meets the viewer’s gaze head on, and stares almost defiantely. She is positioned slightly above the viewer, and gazes down powerfully. She is wearing just enough to not be considered a nude figure. Instead she is a naked one,
All the scenes, all the dresses, all the girls looked identical. They simply put on a temporarily excited face and do what they should do in order to turn a man’s head. Sorry ladies, even your eggshell dress covered in twenty four karat jewels is no longer catching eyes. I was in a vulgar slump. I was so bored with these women that I was about to pack up and leave when that Lily Bart finally took the stage. She was more stunning than any subject I had ever encountered. Everything about her was a challenge to paint. My hand had a fierce tremor as I tried to mix the colors to reflect her beauty. I came across the colors to display her outer beauty, but even the finest art could not do her inner beauty justice. I spent hours on that painting, perfecting the details long after she had fused back into the social landscape. Yet, I never got it quite right. I am convinced that even Van Gogh could not create a painting that would convey her perfect yet scandalous beauty. The rest of the woman call me “the distinguished portrait painter” (137), but that Lily Bart shows me that I am no better than an appearance painting dozens of still life apples. It just so happens that my apple is a rich woman. I hope Lily teaches these poor woman a lesson, as she certainly taught me one. These high class women, and even the men are all trapped on a merry-go-round. I too was trapped like an eagle circling its prey, but this is my chance to finally catch the mouse. I plan to sail to Italy in order to find women like Lily; women with inner beauty. I refuse to return until I have become a real painter, one that does not hesitate at the sight of a exquisite sense. One that paints with love, rather than a formula. Thank you, Lily Bart, for freeing me from this repetitive world. I hope you can free yourself as
This separates her from women in all previous era’s who often gained their attention solely for their attire. Her suit is instead used to draw attention to what she says, as evidence by the upward and diagonal pinstripes that point toward her face. When all of the journalists question her about Earl, their dark colored suits in contrast to her stripes, as well as her position in the center of the frame, maker her the center of attention.This way, in every conversation she’s having all eyes focused on her quick moving lips. The importance of this contrast points to what aspects of women are noticed and highlighted. In the traditional women, it was their physique, and in the “new woman” it is in their intellect. There is also a large glowing light above her head during her dialect with Earl as he points his gun at her, which, coupled with her attire and fluent speech, could be another symbol of her
I have decided to carry out my Personal Investigation researching into the work of both artists, Alphonse Mucha and Gabriel Moreno. It is said that Mucha was and still continues to be one of the most important artists prior to World War I which has therefore influenced me to research further into his work as an artist. What I admire most about this particular artist is in my opinion Mucha chose this specific style to show that during the 19Th Century, traditionally women of the higher classes tended to conform of very formal dress codes which consisted of corsets, bonnets, top hats, bustles and petticoats. Women’s fashion during the Victorian period was largely dominated by full skirts, which gradually moved to the back of the silhouette. Whereas mucha tries to illustrate women as a whole as women of nature- natural and free, dressed in vaguely Grecian gowns, often in forests, and always surrounded by or even wearing flowers. They weren't just in nature; they were a part of it. They were desired, mysterious, lovely, and often associated with the ancient and the magical. Old legends, epics, and fairy tales repeatedly give the same message: Watch out for those older women of magic and nature, all swathed in cloaks and mystery. More often than not, these women are depicted as bitter and cruel, no longer desired by men, and jealous of a young, innocent, beautiful girl whom she tortures, banishes, and afflicts with all kinds of nasty enchantments, poisons, and potions. Indeed, the girl she hates may well be a younger version of herself: the beautiful woman of nature so idealised in art. This younger woman whom she persecutes is, in essence, her replacement. No matter how entrapped she is, her sweetness and her rapport with nature brin...
Using bright colors and subjective mood, Robert Grilley’s 1967 oil painting, the Pink Lady, depicts a man and a woman casually standing before an intensely colored background. Now exhibited at the Chazen Museum in Madison, WI, this stylized work of art conveys a fantastical, almost trippy quality of a 1960’s cocktail party and gives the viewer a sense of unease and glamour. This painting highlights two figures standing close to one another while adverting their eyes and gazing somberly away from one another. While both smoking, the two people play into their gender stereotypes as the man is dressed in a bright blue suit, and the woman in a vibrant pink cocktail dress. During the 1960’s when the painting was created, gender roles were both simultaneously being held to their traditional standards, as well as starting to push against the predetermined boundaries. Grilley’s characteristic color palette, the adverted gaze, and placement of the hands serve as symbols that deal with the complexity of gender norms and sexuality. By decoding these symbols, the painting promotes voyeurism, and encourages the viewer to dissect the role of women and their bodies. Because of its use of iconography, this painting when examined under gender theory, comments on the stereotypical gender roles and how
Stent, S., 2011, ‘Fetishizing the Feminine: the Surreal Fashion of Elsa Schiaparelli’, Nottingham French Studies, September, 50, 78-87.
John Berger’s article explained European eighteenth century art and related it to many of our ideals today. Before he began to explain the art itself, he told us the cultural constructions that exist today. These cultural constructions were enforced and were highlighted through European eighteenth century art. He began by explaining the difference between a man and a woman’s presence. Men’s presence depends how much power he is able to successfully portray. This power can be social, economical, sexual, etc. A woman’s presence expresses her attitude toward herself and in turn how she will allow other to treat her. This explains why women are so critical of themselves and critique their actions no matter what the situation may be.
By situating this work in the style of an American scene oil painting, the imagery and content of the art is further normalized and idealized as the typical American experiences that people strived for in the forties. The focus of the painting is on the people, not the art within the gallery. Blurred statues line the hall with general
The illusion of depth is present as the viewer can clearly distinguish that there exists some sort of space between her and the back; however, no other information is given to help determine how far away the wall is, if the tabletop is flat underneath the cloth, and nor whether she is standing or sitting. Theses unknown questions raise tension and give movement to the painting. Movement is created similarly like in Degas’ painting- the viewer’s eyes is directed along the combination of curved and straight lines through the work of art. As opposed to the curved lines in Degas’s painting, three straight lines arranged in a x-y-z plane manner is responsible for directing the viewer’s gaze to the focal point of this composition- the woman’s face. Emphasis to her face reveal a thoughtful and grim expression on a rosy and bright complexion, which suggest that the root of her despondent mood is not due to some internal suffering, but rather provoked by some external factor. Like Degas, Cézanne slices off the lower body of the woman to emphasize proximity and intimacy from the viewer to the woman. Both works incorporated the art elements of lines and space to draw the viewer’s attention to the woman, specifically her facial expression, but Degas and Cézanne each had their own
Feminism has been an extremely controversial and significant subject over the centuries. The issue of equality between men and women have been questioned and exceedingly debated upon, why men were treated and considered the ‘superior’ gender. During the 1960’s, civil rights, protests against war and gay and lesbian movements were at its peak. It was the period of time, which the Feminist art movement had emerged, also known as the “second-wave” of feminism, shifting away from modernism. Women wanted to gain equal rights as men within the art world. Feminist artists such as Cindy Sherman, Carolee Schneemann and Hannah Wilke pursued to change the world and perspectives on women through their artworks, specifically in body art. Their goal was to “influence cultural attitudes and transform stereotypes.” (DiTolla. T, 2013)
This paper examines representations of women in the French fashion press during the final two years of the Directory period of the French Revolution, from 1797, the foundation of the first French fashion periodical published after 1793, to the coup d’état of Napoleon in November 1799. During the Revolution, dress became a highly contested issue. Certain women wore masculine Revolutionary symbols, like the cockade and Phrygian cap, to facilitate their participation in Revolutionary processes. Many saw the actions of these women as threats to masculine citizenship and there were reports of people violently removing such symbols from the bodies of the women who wore them. In 1793, the increased controversy surrounding the issue of dress forced