Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between books and movies
The hound of the baskervilles critical essay
Book versus movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast between books and movies
Every quality classic novel is made into a cheesy rendition that everyone dismisses as horrible. But that might not always no be the truth, especially when comparing the book The Hound of the Baskervilles and the movie version of it. Both the book The Hound of the Baskervilles and the movie adaptation of it are very different yet very similar in more ways than one. They both use the same story and plot line, but they diverge and portray events in easily identifiable ways. The book was written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle - a brilliant author who wrote all of the other Sherlock Holmes mysteries. David Attwood is the director of the 2002 movie adaption of this classic story. While comparing movie and the book version of The Hound of the Baskervilles, the movie has a lesser level of excitement than the book, it does not let you process facts thoroughly, while giving a much different mood on the moor, making it quite a contrast to the better crafted book version.
As it is shown in both the book The Hound
…show more content…
The book and the movie contrast greatly in their methods of presenting these facts. In the book, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle presents each clue slowly but surely and allows time for you to process and connect the clues. This method also gives the reader time to contemplate possible red herrings and identify all of the real evidence. On page 44, it says that the note was created by TIME Magazine clippings, in order to hide the identity of the writer (Doyle, 44). After that, it gives background and Holmes’ thoughts on the matter, which allows time for reflection and digging deeper into the clue. However, the movie has a very different style of doing this. In the movie, they immediately go from one clue to another, and they connect it for you, leaving you with nothing to wonder about or make predictions
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Many movies based on books, have similarities and differences between them. The same goes for To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Although the movie ran smoothly there were many elements missing from it or that differentiated from the book. Of course there were similarities and the overall theme and message of the novel was reached in the movie. Although the book was more detailed, the movie had the same plot line for the most part. There were some high points and favorite characters in both t he movie and in the book and overall both of these works of creations were very enjoyable.
The Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie The Hound of the Baskervilles directed by Jeremy Bret are two works of art that are mainly telling the same story. There are, however, many differences about the book and the movie. Those differences don’t affect the outcome of the story, but they give less impact to the story. Along with the differences there are many similarities, and those similarities give you confidence that it is the same story.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
In conclusion, books and their movies are never the same. This tenet is known to cause some serious controversy in the secret world of fandoms, the community of people who are dedicated lovers of the same books, movies, TV shows, or any other form of media. John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men is a great example of the changes that differentiate between a novel and the book, as seen above. This book and its movie have obvious changes between the characters, the plot, and dialogue. These things are picked up in practically every book and its movie adaptation. Because of this, there are various discrepancies amongst enthusiasts debating whether the movie outshines the book, or vice versa. But it is all up to you to decide: Do apples taste better, or do oranges?
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
“The Hound of the Baskervilles” demonstrated the differences between the upper class and the lower class and even between those people who were in the same class as each others at the end of the 19th century in England. Beside those differences, there were also some similarities between the two classes. In this essay, I will analyse how they are alike and different in some main aspects such as the belief in the curse, the relationship to the law, their mysterious actions, and especially the subjugation between people in the same class.
Thousands of readers made complaints and the once well known cult figure had been feared to be gone forever. For a couple of years Conan Doyle avoided the reader's. complaints but Doyle eventually buckled under stress and wrote a book. called "The Hound of the Baskervilles". A story set before the tragic ending of Sherlock Holmes.
In order to make good battle scenes in movies and in books the battles need to be serious, they need to have gory deaths, and they need to have a determined leader. The Braveheart novel seems to capture these three elements much better than the movie does. In the book the moments before battle seem much more serious. In the book the Scots under William Wallace could not wait to fight for their freedom, as a matter of fact, it was actually hard to keep them from rushing into it blindly.
“The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, one of the most classic books of all time, written by Washington Irving, was remade into a movie in 1999 by Director Tim Burton. Surprisingly there are many differences between the book and the movie, and little to no similarities. One of the major differences was that in the movie Tim Burton made Ichabod Crane a detective, while in the story he’s a nerdy teacher. Tim Burton did this to make the movie more interesting and for there to be a reason why Ichabod is so good at finding clues and solving the headless horseman case. Also they made Ichabod a little bit more brave in the movie so that there would be more action and drama in the movie. A total different between the story and the movie, is that they give a background of young Ichabod and his mother, but none of that was
The Hound of the Baskervilles is one of Arthur Conan Doyle 's most famous works. The novel is the prime example of a Gothic Detective Story. Written during the first year of the 20th Century, the novel is a reflection of the concerns and issues that were prevalent at the time. The novel incorporates beliefs that were widely popular, including atavism and criminality. Although the novel is viewed as just another addition to the Sherlock Holmes canon, there are deeper philosophical conflicts that reflect the time period in which the novel was written.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
The setting of The Hound of the Baskervilles by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is very important to the book’s story. In the beginning of the story, the setting is late 18th century London, where Sherlock Holmes and his colleague, John Watson live. Sherlock and John live in a small, yet upscale flat on Baker Street in London. Tobacco smoke often fills this apartment, and this is where he gets a lot of his thinking about theories and threads done for cases. The book itself states, “As I entered, however, my fears were set at rest, for it was the acrid fumes of strong coarse tobacco which took me by the throat and set me coughing.” This shows that while Sherlock is left alone to think, he smokes huge amounts of tobacco. The text also later states, “‘Yes, I have thought a good deal throughout the course of the day.’” When Watson leaves Sherlock to think about the case and consider theories, SHerlock sits alone in the flat, smokes tobacco, and solely focuses on the case at hand.
The Hound of the Baskervilles, written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a novel which evidently demonstrates the sexual politics towards women found throughout Victorian literature. The women in this novel are portrayed as stereotypical characters of the time period. They hold jobs such as a typist and housekeeper, both very fitting for the time. Two women in this novel find themselves being manipulated by a men, one in particular, Mr. Stapleton, who uses these women as pawns in his political agenda. Mr. Stapleton demonstrates the amount of power men held over women during this time period.
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.