Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective approaches in leadership and management
Effective approaches in leadership management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction The History of Kodak The Eastman Kodak Company was established in the 1880’s as a film business, set on establishing its brand name in the marketplace through customer-focused advertising and growth through research and development and low cost mass production. The founder, George Eastman, described Kodak’s competitive philosophy by commenting that “nothing is more important than the value of our name and the quality it stands for. We must make quality our fighting argument” (Gavetti, Henderson & Giorgi, 2005). Kodak’s competitive advantage began in black and white film products, even though the company did produce cameras and camera equipment as well. As the years progressed, Kodak “paid progressively less attention to equipment” and concentrated more on the development of colored film and photo-finishing processes (Gavetti et al, 2005). In the 1960’s, Kodak focused on growth in incremental modifications to photo equipment products, which lead to Kodak’s dominance over 90% of the film market and 85% of the camera market in 1976. Although competitors began to emerge, Kodak was satisfied with its achievement of $10 billion in sales. For much of its history, Kodak had been very successful. Kodak began to expand into other business lines in the 1980s and 1990s, acquiring Clinical Diagnostics, Mass Memory, and Sterling Drug. While Kodak dabbled in other business ventures, the scope of technology had dramatically increased, offering new players a chance at a changing market that no longer needed photographic film. Sony and Fuji were two such competitors that took advantage of this situation, steadily gaining market share in the digital film industry. While Kodak did develop innovative products in the early 1990s... ... middle of paper ... ...the digital arena. Kodak must also be sure to increase its absorptive knowledge so another such technological change will not compromise a weak value proposition once again. Works Cited Gavetti, G., Henderson, R., & Giorgi, S. (2005). Kodak and the digital revolution. Harvard Business School. Innovation Management. (2011). Unpublished raw data, Retrieved from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/87282228/Innovation-Management Jurevicius, O. (2013, May 27). Strategic Management Insight: Porter's Five Forces. Retrieved from http://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/porters-five-forces.html Jurevicius, O. (2013, February 13). Strategic Management Insight: SWOT Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/swot-analysis-how-to-do-it.html Rothaermel, F. T. (2012). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, p. 105-106.
Gustavon, Todd. Camera: A History of Photography from daguerreotype to Digital. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing, 2009. Intro p.2
It is considered that photography only became widely available to the public when the Kodak Eastman Company introduced the box shaped Brownie Camera in 1900. (Baker, n.p.) Its features became more refined since its original placing on the market; one of the reasons why it has become considered the birth of public photography is because of the processing. Using a similar image capture system, the brownie exposed the light to a 120mm roll of film, which could be wound round, meaning six photographs could be taken before the slides needed removing. The first Brownie used a six-exposure cartridge that Kodak processed for the photographer. (Kodak.com, n.d.) Realistically, the armature photographers did not need to understand darkroom processes, they could simply use capture the subjects, and send it to be developed. The cameras were relatively affordable, targeting many different markets, which is apparent from their advertisements. Figure 2 Is an advertisement from for the Eastman Kodak Company’s Brownie Camera; It states in bold lettering “Operated by any school boy or girl” which emphasis how it was targeted for amateur use.
George Eastman founded the Eastman Kodak Company in 1888, and pioneered the photography industry with new technology that would help bring photography to the mainstream. After its inception, Kodak created what many called a "monopoly" in the photography industry. Both in 1921 and in 1954 the company had to endure a consent decree imposed by the US Government in which it was concluded that Kodak monopolized the market in violation of the Sherman Act (the first and oldest of all US federal, antitrust laws). Kodak settled the 1921 decree and agreed to be bound by restrictions. The Company was barred from preventing dealers from freely selling goods produced by competitors. On the other hand, the 1954 decree prevented Kodak from selling a bundle that included the color film and the photofinishing, among other restrictions. This tying arrangement of products is an agreement by a party to sell one product on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or tied) product, or at least agrees that he will not purchase that product from any other supplier. In this case, Kodak was selling the photo film while conditioning the buyer to also buy the photofinishing product (because it was included in the price). Both decrees had supporting evidence of the high market power that Kodak had at the time, for which both cases were based.
A great deal of information was covered this week such as, the necessity in which businesses need to effectively plan and set objectives, the strategies utilized and how they are executed to obtains results, and how managements decisions can potentially affect those results. Although each topic covered was found to be interesting and informational, there was something in particular that struck a chord, which was how business establishments have to be flexible and adaptable and in many instances plan and change their strategies of today, in order to keep up with the evolving technology of tomorrow. Something that one often thinks about is how individuals use technology today and how companies that provide that technology are adapting. For instance, author Richard Daft of the textbook, Management, 12th ed. brings to light the potential issues that Intel is facing explaining “As another example of an external threat, Intel, whose microprocessors power most PCs, is being hurt by the decline in demand for personal computers as more people turn to tablets and smartphones.” (Daft, 2016, pg. 259). After reading this, one wanted to take a deep look into what it is exactly that Intel intends to do to overcome this obstacle and found some
6.Brian A. Johnson, John H. Ott, Jack M. Stephenson, Paal K. Weberg. Banking on multimedia. The McKinsey Quarterly 1995.
During the 1990s, each company experienced specific difficulties to their market share. Both companies struggled to reestablish themselves in the global consumer electronics world. As the year 2000 came around, new CEOs at both companies came up with even more complicated initiatives and reorganizations. Outsiders wondered how each company’s internal changes would affect their endless competitive battle in the industry.
In this essay I will look at the Film Company and distributor Universal Studios, also known as Universal Pictures. I will analyse the logo, branding, and marketing within the corporate company. Overview of Universal Studios. With a long history in the film making industry, Universal Studios is the largest film studio in the world, with 9000 employee’s. The company produced ‘ET: The Extra Terrestrial’ and ‘Jurassic Park’ which are two of the highest grossing movies of all time.
The case is set out in a period where leading film product producing company, Kodak is faced with competitive pressures and market share losses. According to the case, between January 17 and January 24 1994, Kodak has lost 8% of its value, due to rumors of a price cut. Kodak’s market share over a 5-year period has also fallen from 76% to 70%. Although it was still the leading firm in the film production industry, it had rising competitive pressures from players such as Fuji co, Konica and other brands, which had products that were priced much lower than Kodak’s flagship brand Gold plus. This led them to develop a new brand called Funtime, which was priced at the same level of that of Konica and Fuji, 20% lower then Gold plus brand.
Hunsk Engines is a motorcycle company that made the fatal mistake of expanding its research in the market on its new products. The companies main competitors were companies like Harley Davidson, where they sold classic products that were seen as something with altering respect. Marty Echt is hired on by Hunsk Engines to restore the company’s image, on what used to be classic motorcycles. He argues that the company made the mistake of forgetting about its original products and, “lost its identity”. This problem frequently happens when companies attempt to grow, in order for new products to make it in the market place you have to carefully strategize its competitive characteristics and know when to introduce a new product through Michael Porters life cycle.
The core focus of this report is devising a new product and implement marketing plan for Canon plc. The company is currently facing huge competition from its competitor worldwide, especially in Japan where it has lost market leadership. Due to the decreasing profit margin and threat of losing market share, the company has decided to come up with new innovate Canon Hybrid DSLR which will help the company in improving its profit margin and sustaining market share in UK and worldwide. The report is divided into six parts, which are as follow
Diversification or further investing in the current portfolio would not have been the solution. Understanding the market needs is more than understanding technological advancement because innovation should be market driven. In this case, both strategies could still have been practical but with the customers’ needs in mind. Additionally, increasing production efficiency in retention of current business strategy could also have boosted its revenues by reducing wastage or idle time. Considering not all countries move at the same technological level, the company could still have invested in supplying the outdated products to places such as India or Africa. However, as the CEO there is a need to pursue the best strategy by focusing on what works our best but still have the customers ' mind at heart (Xerox Maps Business Service Strategy,
...&D capability was not supported by their ability to efficiently produce and market the innovation. Since the R&D is separated from production and sales, it was not market-oriented enough. The limitation of sharing local market knowledge also leads Philips to its inability sell the excellent innovation that R&D has developed. Seeing this as opportunity, Japanese companies able to combine Philips invention with their mass-market production ability and successfully became the leader in the market.
Two new managers have been appointed at Sony in the last 15 years due to a number of developing problems, including the innovation ‘cogs’ within Sony slowing down, being forced into an aggressive pricing strategy, increased competition, losing the battle of VHS and Betamax, profit and sales remaining flat and the ongoing poor performance of Sony films (Mintzberg et al, 2003). Both managers initiated major strategic changes with varying degrees of success; firstly Nobuyuki Idei was appointed and initiated a major shift from analogue to digital technology, as there was a belief that Sony was falling behind the market in this respect. Idei also targeted the top position in the audio and visual industry, a universal standard in home computer devices and a new distribution infrastructure. He believed his job was the ‘regeneration of the entrepreneurial spirit’ (Mintzberg et al, 2003), believing it had been lost.
Apple, encapsulated in that name are the ideals and paradigms that have made Apple the most successful brand of the early 21st century. The connotations of that name Apple is far reaching immediately conveying to one the aims, goals and dreams of this company. As Steve Chazin (2008) put it, “They are making complex things simple and elegant”. In recent times one can easily juxtapose the word innovation with Apple, they have become synonymous with each other and rightly so in that Apple’s ability to dislodge the hegemony that Microsoft had presided over the software/hardware market required unprecedented innovative efforts. These innovative efforts were at the foundations of this company where in the 1970’s they introduced the television as a display system of watching and cassette interface for listening and recording programs. This paper attempts to gauge and give an appraisal through marketing lens specifically targeting their use of Neil Borden’s marketing mix elements (product, place, promotion & price).
People always want to keep the prefect moments in their lives. So they invented cameras that the earliest invention which can help people to do that. Nowadays cameras have become a part of people¡¯s lives. Most of families own at least one camera. Wherever there is a party, a picnic, a wedding or something else, we use a camera to save the memories. With the development of technology, there is a new kind of camera which becomes a fashion all over the word. It named digital camera which is short for DC. Digital cameras are different form the traditional cameras. The biggest differentiation between the two cameras are digital cameras do not need films whilst tradition camera need. Compare with tradition camera, digital camera has more advantages for ordinary consumer than disadvantages. But people use the tradition cameras for more than 150 years, will they easily to accept the new camera? How to motivate consumer to buy digital cameras? Can the marketers create such a need to them? For this article, I would discuss the need and motivation of consumers, and show the answer about the questions above.