Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology's affect on culture
The problems with honor killings
The problems with honor killings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology's affect on culture
The brutality of ancient society has long since past, yet in this modern era of civility, honor killings still exist. Honor killings take place in certain cultures within a family. Honor killing victims are most frequently females. If the family feels that they have brought shame or have dishonored the family in anyway the only means to get rid of the shame or dishonor is to kill that member of the family. After that is done the honor is restored within the family again. Honor killings can commence due to multiple factors such as disobeying husbands, having affairs, talking to other males outside of the family, asking for a divorce, and many other harmless actions that many women do daily in other cultures. However a question still arise …show more content…
One could argue that culture can be changed and modified to fit today’s society. With the advancement in technology and resources cultures have changed. Many cultures have tweaked traditions and lifestyles to fit in with the new changes in society. For instance, “after several centuries of relentless pressure from European Americans to adopt their ways, Native American cultures have been largely acculturated. As a result, the vast majority of American Indians now speak English instead of their ancestral language, wear European style clothes, go to school to learn about the world from a European perspective, and see themselves as being a part of the broader American society.”( O'Neil). This proves that culture is not set in stone and can be changed or be modified to fit today’s society. Then again, honor killings have become a part of a “social norm” to the culture and are not questioned by the community. “Traditional misinterpretations of religion have played a role in developing a patriarchal culture that places and emphasis on female chastity and male superiority.” (Muhammad, 28). The people in these countries …show more content…
People are not fazed by it and do not think to stop it. The abuse of females is very common in the culture and not questioned. If no one questions this cultural practice it will keep reoccurring in society. The culture behind this tradition is male superiority. It is up to the men to decide if the tradition should still go on. Women do not have a say if they agree or disagree with this tradition. Studies on this event have found that “Families and communities contribute to covering up the perpetrator’s homicide by maintaining their silence because of their support for honour killing as a culturally acceptable and heroic act” (Muhammad,27). The community do not think twice to about covering up since in is imbedded to their culture and feel it must be done. This causes problems because if the authorities are not informed about the amount of honour killings occurring then nothing will be done to stop it. This is a huge problem because of the lack of awareness around this problem. In 2000 an estimated 5000 cases happen per year worldwide. (Cohan, 191). Although this number might seem low on a global scale it is not very accurate considering the
Honour went hand in hand with how reputable a family was considered to be within the community. There were two types of honour; “honor” which symbolized the honour brought to an individual by their family or their birth right, and “honra” which represented ones virtue in the sense of morality and piety or their saintliness. Honour killings would occasionally be performed (most often by men) on women who took lovers behind their husband’s backs. To restore his honour, the husband would be legally allowed to kill both his wife and her lover. Women would also resort to violent tendencies if anyone threatened their families’ honour and reputation. High class woman were known to protect both their own honour and the households by filing lawsuits and beating other women they saw as treats, making women more likely than men to act out in defence. In the “Scandal at the Church” case, Mr. de Alfaro indirectly refers to his wife’s and his family’s honour multiple times as his wife was attacked in the daylight crowds after mass. With so many people present to witness his wife’s beating and Mrs. Bravo’s insulting words, Mr. de Alfaro’s family honour was tarnished as a direct result from the scandal. Even as a man of a lower class, honour is still incredibly important as other families within the community base their perceptions on how honourable and thus reputable a family is. Mrs.
“Honor is the value of a person in his or her own eyes. Honor is a claim to worth along with social acknowledgement of worth.” (Malina 31) This phrase tells us that honor was extremely important to the ancient people. Honor is a value that was present during many occasions in the play. This value can be seen in Oedipus. He promised the citizens of Thebes that he would find the murderer of Laius and free the lands from the plague. The murderer was to be exiled from Thebes. Oedipus later found out that he himself was the murderer. Even though he was king, he honored the punishment and exiled himself from Thebes. The New Testament states that honor in women meant positive shame. Positive shame is the sensitivity of one 's own reputation. A shameless person is considered a dishonorable woman. Women have to be ashamed and remain shy to avoid human contacts that might expose her to dishonor. (Malina 50) This value can be seen in Jocasta. She feels ashamed when she finds out that her husband Oedipus turned out to be her son. In order to remain honorable, her shame led her to commit
The book A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini is one great example of religious and cultural conformity. A young girl living in Afghanistan, Mariam, is sent to live with her father after her mother commits suicide. His wives are not accepting of Mariam because she has not been apart of their happy lives and they don’t want to have a stranger living with them. Also, religious and cultural expectations pressure them to convince Mariam’s father to marry her off to a much older man in Kabul. Her father and his wives conformed to what was socially acceptable in their society. Even though the wives wanted Mariam gone, her father did not, but still gave in. The pressure that made Mariam’s dad and his wives send her off was conformity, or to go with the flow of the rest of society. Their decision ultimately lead Mariam to have to conform to the new culture and role as a wife. The conformity in Afghanistan and more specifically in this book lead a young girl to be separated from her father and placed in a whole new place and had to figure it out basically in her own. Society is based upon different opinions and society should not want conformity because some people are pressured to do things that they don’t have the capability to do or might not agree
Franklin Zimring (2003) examines the relationship between the history of lynching and current capital punishment in the United States argueing that the link between them is a vigilante tradition. He adequately shows an association between historical lynchings and modern executions, though this paper will show additional evidence that would help strengthen this argument, but other areas of Zimring’s argument are not as well supported. His attitudinal and behavioral measures of modern vigilantism are insufficient and could easily be interpreted as measuring other concepts. Also missing from Zimring’s analysis is an explanation for the transition of executions from representing government control in the past to executions as representing community control in the present. Finally, I argue that Zimring leaves out any meaningful discussion of the role of race in both past lynchings and modern executions. To support my argument, using recent research, I will show how race has played an important role in both past lynchings and modern executions and how the changing form of racial relations may explain the transition from lynchings to legal executions.
Culture often means an appreciation of the finer things in life; however, culture brings members of a society together. We have a sense of belonging because we share similar beliefs, values, and attitudes about what’s right and wrong. As a result, culture changes as people adapt to their surroundings. According to Bishop Donald, “let it begin with me and my children and grandchildren” (211). Among other things, culture influences what you eat; how you were raised and will raise your own children? If, when, and whom you will marry; how you make and spend money. Truth is culture is adaptive and always changing over time because
The story of “Killings” by Andre Dubus looked into the themes of crime, revenge and morality. The crime committed in the story depicted the father’s love for his son and the desire to avenge his son’s death. However, his own crime led to his own destruction as he was faced with questions of morality. The character found himself in a difficult position after taking his revenge. He failed to anticipate the guilt associated with the crime he committed. Feelings of anger and righteousness are illustrated by the character throughout the story.
Other than honor killings, domestic violence is another form of interpersonal crime. Honor killings and domestic violence are similar because both cases involve control. They both involve denying the victim their individual right to free and conscious choice and decision making. On the other hand, honor
Honor, just as today, is the way your name is viewed by others in the public. Threats toward ones honor might be defended differently in the public view. Honor varied between genders. Males felt it necessary to defend their honor when another slighted their masculinity, family, or physical ability. Females felt honor too. They often saw it important to defend their honor like did the males. Usually it was defended by gossip or name-calling but on occasion did result in physical violence as well. Females saw honor in a moral sense. Ones sexual activity or lack thereof before marriage, fidelity in marriage and celibacy after marriage all proved a woman to be honorable. Just like today, a personal reputation would be on the line if called a demoralizing name.
The culture of a community invariably determines the social structures and the formation of a society. Developed over time, culture is the collection of beliefs and values that a group of people maintain together. Culture is never constant, and thought to be continually renewed over years as new ideas and concepts become mainstream. It ranges from how people live, day to day topics for conversations, religion, and even entertainment. It is analogous to guidelines, or the rulebook of the said group of people. Society, on the other hand, emanates from the social structure of the community. It is the very institutions to which create a regulated and acceptable form of interaction between peoples. Indeed, culture and society are so perversely intertwined in a
Lets start by understanding that cultures are a melting pot of people’s beliefs, language, behaviors, values, material objects, and norms. Norms are written and non-written “expectations of behavior” that govern a certain location, place, or culture (26). These norms also vary from culture to culture meaning what is a norm in the U.S may not be a norm in India. For example, a norm in America would be tipping a waiter after a meal. Another would be acknowledging someone as you walk past him or her, typically done at work or in a public place. In all, norms are folkways, mores, taboos, and written laws that are an established standard of one’s behavior.
Culture is expressed through a variety of different ways, from clothing styles to lifestyles to faithful traditions. It can also have a deep impact on the viewpoints of those around you, whether negatively or positively. No matter how a person goes about their everyday life, they can rise above the expectations of their culture to change the world around them. Culture does not have to be the basis of every thought, word, or deed of a person.
Throughout the history of man there has always existed a sort of rule pertaining to retribution for just and unjust acts. For the just came rewards, and for the unjust came punishments. This has been a law as old as time. One philosophy about the treatment of the unjust is most controversial in modern time and throughout our history; which is is the ethical decision of a death penalty. This controversial issue of punishment by death has been going on for centuries. It dates back to as early as 399 B.C.E., to when Socrates was forced to drink hemlock for his “corruption of the youth” and “impiety”.
While a culture doesn’t need to try and justify murder in the name of honor, it does show that they are devoted and centered around such concepts. If this is what a person views to be honor, the United States and most other western cultures are unhonorable. If the United States are to be viewed as honorable, it is only obtainable through militarily obtaining it in most cases. While most people might believe that American honor has no more than to do with the military, which makes sense provided all the evidence that there is that would point a person to this conclusion, others believe otherwise. These people hold firm to the idea that anyone can be considered honorable in their everyday lives by simply doing minor things. Simply put, these people don’t believe that you need to be a hero and serve your country through combat. Honor has been viewed diffurently by many different cultures and time periods, some even going to the quite extreme of killing either yourself or females in your family to keep honor, but one thing is certain, honor bears the simple principles of nobility and
...pics we can get at least a partial picture of how the ancient civilizations regarded the concept of honour and come to a few conclusions about what it is and how it functions. At times it seems like a commodity that is traded around, and it is certainly attached to material goods. One’s birth and fate, and more importantly how they act and what they do with their fate, adds to one’s honour, but it is most important to be courageous and show excellence through great deeds, especially military victory.
First of all the most important tool we have available against this type of crime are the authorities, which include the police department, hospital, and social workers. If they manage to work together as a team to make the whole process of protecting a victim more efficiently, it will encourage victims to actually phone for help. It is believed that over half of the abuses remain unreported due to the fear of the victims from their intimate partner who has committed the crime. If such crime is reported in a western country, the offender would be arrested by the police department until a clear picture is made of the happenings. In addition, the victim, which is usually the wife of the offender, would be brought to a safe place were she would receive medical attention and can talk to someone (a women), since the best method of digesting such tragedy is to share it with someone that can listen and give advice. Safe places are established in many modern countries such as Switzerland, but unfortunately this is not the norm in all parts of the country, since it is not law yet. Such safe houses are essential in aiding the sufferers, since t...