Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Humanist approach essay
Imperialism old and new
The humanistic approach essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Humanist approach essay
In George Orwell's analytically essay, Shooting an Elephant, Orwell reflects on the five years he spent working as a police officer for the Indian Imperial Police in Burma, India. While writing about a serious issue in his essay, George takes a less formal approach to this particular piece of writing; reflecting on past events in a form of a personal memoir. It is within his memoir, Orwell explores the cruelty of the human race and the actions people, including himself, take to prevent further ridicule and abuse. George Orwell utilizes an extreme humanist perspective against imperialism, using his own traumatizing experiences in India to support his claim regarding the 'natural' cruelty humans seem to inherit when feeling oppressed.
Orwell is able to effectively express his argument of the subliminal, but drastic impact that imperialism can have on a suppressed nation. Orwell achieves this by giving his readers many examples of the inhumane treatment he endured while in India. As an Imperial officer working for the British Imperial Empire, Orwell is deeply resented by all of the Burmese people in Lower Burma that are under his rule and protection. However, George states in his essay that instead of protecting the people of Burma he spent a vast majority of his time struggling not to be ridiculed or abused by the locals. George Orwell openly expresses his own frustration to his situation in his memoir; his obvious dislike "for the empire [he] served" (Orwell 282) and its imperialism oppression and his blatant "rage against evil-spirited little beasts" (282) who reciprocated his hatred because of his employment as a British officer in their home. However, it is because of Orwell's inability to choose between his British identity an...
... middle of paper ...
...upporting imperialism and the motivations behind their actions. Orwell, by admitting that his motive for killing the innocent beast was brought on by his own will to avoid humiliation at the hands of the locals means that Orwell is able to recognize the. With Orwell the oppression of the British on the Burmese people caused direct harm to Orwell. It is because of this cruelty found in humans that Orwell places emphasis in his essay on the unjustified violence inflicted on the elephant, who wrongly received judgement from the imperialistic response of Orwell to combat his own inner demons with the locals.
Works Cited
Davis, Roger, Laura K. Davis, Kay L. Stewart, and Chris J. Bullock. Essay Writing for Canadian Students with Readings. 7th ed.. Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc, 2013. Print.
Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant." New Writing [London] 1936, n. pag. Print.
In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.
Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays. Ed. Sonia Orwell. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1950. 3-12.
I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool." So ends George Orwell's poignant reminiscence of an incident representing the imperialist British in Burma. Unlike Soyinka, who wrote about colonialism from the African's point of view, Orwell, like Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness, presents the moral dilemmas of the imperialist. Orwell served with the Imperialist Police in Burma while it was still part of the British Commonwealth and Empire. His service from 1922 to 1927 burdened himwith a sense of guilt about British colonialism as well a need to make some personal expiation for it (Norton 2259). "Shooting an Elephant" chronicles an incident in which Orwell confronts a moral dilemma and abandons his morals to escape the mockery of the native Burmans. He repeatedly shoots and kills an elephant which had ravaged a bazaar and scared many Burmans even though "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him" (6).
Orwell’s essay demonstrated the British supremacy against the colonized as it revealed how insignificant their deaths were. Being a police superintendent in Burma, Orwell was called when an otherwise tame elephant ran rampant. In his search for the animal, he stumbled upon a dead Burman, who was trampled by the elephant, and referred to him as a “black Dravidian coolie.” Oxford dictionary defined a coolie as “an offensive term for an unskilled native labourer in an Asian country.” At the end of the essay, Orwell tracked down the elephant and killed it. When the discussion arose about the shooting, a young British man said he was in the wrong by justifying that even “an elephant was worth more than any damn Coringhee coolie”. Yet, Orwell stood by his actions, as he stated “I was very glad that the coolie had been killed…it gave me a suffic...
The straightforward approach Orwell uses in his prose is unlike any other, and he gets his point across with a firm hand. This lucid prose, with its unparalleled directness has left some of his works at the forefront of heated debates over many topics, including imperialism and its negative impact. In Shooting an Elephant, he addresses these effects on both parties, the imperialist British as well as the colonized Burmese. In the case of the British, the process of imperialization triggered a dehumanization fueled by the false sense of omnipotence. The people were taught to believe that the new, “better” rulers, the white ...
In the story “Shooting an Elephant”, George Orwell recounts an experience where he was faced with a moral dilemma during the unpleasant years he spent working as a British police officer in Burma. Due to the British empire's dictatorship, the natives ridiculed and mocked his foreign presence and authority. Triggering Orwell to hate his job, hate British imperialism and hate the Burmese natives. However, shooting the elephant gave him a sight of the true nature of imperialism. Through his actions, Orwell efficiently demonstrates the negative effects of imperialism on individuals and society. In the passage, the theme of colonialism is demonstrated through Orwell’s use of key literary elements such as symbolism, tone, setting, and language.
The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.
It is understandable how a animal used for labor can be used to portray the working class that were being abused and provoked just how some animals are taken advantage of. Now, although the officer had a sense of authority and military sovereignty, he was far from gaining respect from a country that was being overworked and stripped from their freedom. I also found it interesting that Orwell focused on the officer’s thoughts and his perspective on how he viewed the struggle. The officer knew morally and politically that the British Empire was in the wrong, but like many citizens that live in dictatorship countries, they really don’t speak up or go against their country simply because it easy for them to be imprisoned. In this short essay, Orwell demonstrates that it is inhumane for someone to kill an elephant. In addition, the British Empire can be seen as being inhumane for colonizing Burma and how they went about things. Furthermore, the officer’s elephant assassination exemplifies the way a forceful settling cycle can be placed upon a silenced country that no interest in being manipulated or abused. In conclusion, Orwell ends the story by writing about how the officer fires several shots into the elephant that after so much pain and agony the poor animal dies hours later. Orwell tries to explain that the animal was just trying to fight back after so many wrongs were done to
In the personal narrative Shooting an Elephant, James Orwell expresses the fear of humiliation as a message. Orwell was worried about the bystanders laughing and mocking him if he didn’t shoot the elephant and got trampled by the raging beast. This compels him to kill the, now peaceful, animal. The elephant represents the Burmese society while Orwell’s fear symbolizes the motive of the broader British colonial project. Orwell, the imperial police officer, sacrificed his knowledge of doing what’s right to not be humiliated in front of the citizens. “But at that moment I glanced round at the crowd that had followed me.” (pg. 1322)Orwell is explaining how he
George Orwell acknowledged that every line of his serious work that he had written since 1936 was implicitly or explicitly associated with anti-imperialism and in favor of democratic socialism. By democratic socialism he mostly focused on liberal and humane beliefs rather than its political and economical principles (Meyers 2000, 90). G. Orwell grew up in such atmosphere where despotic British Empire had been dominating over the East by treating the natives in a dehumanizing manner, making them feel inferior to the empire and eliminating their personal autonomy by the idea of imperialism’s being superior. However, his experiences while working in Burma made him aware of the opposite case. In his essay “Shooting the Elephant”
While imperialism is not something that, to the fullest measure, exists today, it is safe to argue that these concepts of social discrimination and racial injustice continue to remain at the top of the undeniable ‘social issues’ list in the modern society. Due to the fact that this idea of social inequality remains an extremely sensitive topic, Orwell’s works connect and resonate greatly. In Orwell’s ‘Shooting an Elephant,’ he details a situation where a policeman is forced to shoot an elephant that is no direct threat to anyone, “and it was in this moment that [he] first grasped the hollowness, the futility of the white man’s domination in the east” (Orwell 3). This piece of work is extremely notable because Orwell highlights his views on the nature of imperialism and the prejudice and harm that can come from it. This idea connects greatly to the modern world because, ideas of social prejudice are still extremely prominent today, what with current issues centering on the discrimination of African-Americans or people of color, which ultimately went on to spark the Black Lives Matter revolution, a movement that has taken great measures to educate and advocate for racial equality. All in all, Orwell’s acknowledgement and detailing of social injustice is one of the many reasons as to why his works are so important and connect with so many individuals
In his essay Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell explains how the controlling authorities in a hostile country are not controlling the country's population but are in fact a mere tool of the populous. Orwell's experience with the elephant provided the insight for his essay, and gives a clear example of the control the natives have over the authorities.
Orwell is a colonist within a colony and is therefore bestowed with a influential position of authority. As part of the white police force, he has strict obligation to his country and the British empire; anyhow, he rejects the political injustices of imperial life and despises the “real motives for which a despotic government act”. Because Orwell's actions, such as his reluctance to carry out his assignment advice as well that he is not agreeing with what his duties demand. Anyhow, he regrets having shot the elephant but more to the point he regrets having been part of colonialism and imperialism; he thinks those were harmful to both colonized and colonizers and he regrets his involvement. Orwell does not believe in imperialism; his original intentions were intimidating the elephant into submission “I had never shot an elephant and never wanted to” however, those intentions changed when he realized that the Burmese were expecting him to execute the elephant “The elephant was going to be shot. They were watching me as they would watch a conjurer about to perform a trick” His own beliefs were sacrificed for his own country’s political conquest. Moreover, Orwell himself is a symbol of that everything was bad with the colonial British rule and he himself is aware of it “The young Buddhist priest were the worst of all. There were several thousands of them in town and none of them seemed to have anything to do
Orwell first encountered colonialism as a police officer in British-ruled Burma and recognized its effect on the imperialists, one like him. In a foreign country, Orwell already felt alienated and unsafe but truly hated his job. One of his experiences involves Orwell, a gun, an elephant, a...
"Shooting an Elephant" is perhaps one of the most anthologized essays in the English language. It is a splendid essay and a terrific model for a theme of narration. The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. People do crazy and sometimes illegal moves to get a certain group or person to finally give them respect. George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country to the white man's reputation. The author's purpose is to explain the audience (who is both English and Burmese) about the kind of life he is living in Burma, about the conditions, circumstances he is facing and to tell the British Empire what he think about their imperialism and his growing displeasure for the imperial domination of British Empire.