Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shooting an elephant by orwell analysis
Orwell colonialism
Shooting an elephant analysis and summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shooting an elephant by orwell analysis
In the story “Shooting an Elephant”, George Orwell recounts an experience where he was faced with a moral dilemma during the unpleasant years he spent working as a British police officer in Burma. Due to the British empire's dictatorship, the natives ridiculed and mocked his foreign presence and authority. Triggering Orwell to hate his job, hate British imperialism and hate the Burmese natives. However, shooting the elephant gave him a sight of the true nature of imperialism. Through his actions, Orwell efficiently demonstrates the negative effects of imperialism on individuals and society. In the passage, the theme of colonialism is demonstrated through Orwell’s use of key literary elements such as symbolism, tone, setting, and language.
Orwell uses his experience of shooting an elephant as an example of the effects of colonialism. He writes “It gave a better glimpse of the real nature of imperialism – the real motives for which despotic government act.” (Orwell). Shooting an elephant as it calmly eats, once it no longer poses a threat, is an act of barbarism, which symbolized the barbarity of colonialism altogether. The elephant’s must is a result of a
…show more content…
life in captivity, as Orwell explains “It had been chained up, as tame elephants always are when their attack of “must” is due.” (Orwell). Likewise, the ridicule and disrespect that police like Orwell received from the natives were an understandable result of the limitations the colonial regime imposed on the natives. Orwell knew he shouldn’t shoot the elephant, likewise, he knew the natives did not deserve to be subjected to restraints by the government. Nonetheless, he ends up shooting the elephant not because of its immoralities, but because of the corrupt ideals of the man holding the rifle. By showing how the components of colonialism and imperialism force him to act barbarically, Orwell exemplifies that “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” (Orwell). The use irony helps Orwell strongly conveys his theme. The irony is a key component to this story, as it helps the readers understand how being an imperialistic power essentially limits freedom. Instead of listing the cruel things done by the British colonizers to the colonized, it criticizes colonialism by revealing how it ironically restrains the freedom of the colonizer. For example, the natives had control and power over the officer instead of being the other way around. Shooting the elephant made him feel important to the native people for once, as George wrote: “They did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands, I was momentarily worth watching.” (Orwell). The tone is also a key literary aspect of George Orwell’s story.
The tone toward his readers was friendly, revealing, and informal. This approach draws the reader in and motivates them to trust him because he shares intimate details about himself, such as the fact that he was hated and conflicted. This approach allows the narrator to reveal parts of his personality that we would otherwise not see. For example, when he said, "I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible.” (Orwell).Hee speaks from the perspective of working man trying to do the right thing in a situation that is, from his viewpoint, impossible. Since he’s so honest about his problems the readers can effectively follow, understand and relate to his
thoughts. The use of language and diction in his essay helps Orwell effectively conveys his emotions and message to his readers. Throughout the story, the author uses words and phrases from eastern terminology, Latin, and Hindu. He used words such as coolie (unskilled laborer), bazaar (marketplace), and mahout (skilled elephant trainer). These terms help give the reader a better picture of the social status and the culture he’s currently living in. Orwell also uses descriptive language to show the hidden cruelty of imperialism, for example when he said: "The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups" (Orwell). This shows how Burmese prisoners were treated like animals, trapped in small overcrowded rooms, in horrendous conditions. The metaphor of "stinking cages" creates a striking image for the reader of jails in imperialist Burma. “Shooting an Elephant” displays its theme powerfully with the of literary elements. Symbolism, diction, tone and language all work together to create a strong impact on the reader of the evils of imperialism. Orwell’s narrative was written to expose the corruptness of colonialism and the damages it inflicts on both parties. The author displays this perfectly by turning himself, who was supposed to be the greater power, into the victim. Thus, exposing the fact people will do immoral things simply to “avoid looking a fool."
In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.
Every day, each individual will look back on decisions he or she have made and mature from those experiences. Though it takes time to realize these choices, the morals and knowledge obtained from them are priceless. In George Orwell’s nonfictional essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, a young Orwell was stationed in Burma for the British imperial forces, tasked to deal with an elephant who destroyed various parts of the village Moulmein while its owner was away. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Written with a fusion of his young and old self’s outlook on shooting the elephant, Orwell’s essay is a sensational read that captivates his audience and leaves them questioning his decision.
Although shooting the, now seemingly calm, “mad elephant” is morally wrong to George Orwell, in his narration of Shooting an Elephant, he has to do so as he is a representative, or more so a pawn, of the British authority in the occupied country of Burma. Being such, he wages a war with his inner self to seek which decision needs to be carried out. With two outcomes in mind, one being that he will be seen as a fool if he does not shoot the elephant and the other being an authority of the law by truly showing it and protecting the villagers, he has an epiphany. With such an authority, the law and someone’s moral conscience diverge. He then realizes what must be done and shoots the elephant to protect the imperialistic authority. As the excitement
George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is a short story that not only shows cultural divides and how they affect our actions, but also how that cultural prejudice may also affect other parties, even if, in this story, that other party may only be an elephant. Orwell shows the play for power between the Burmese and the narrator, a white British police-officer. It shows the severe prejudice between the British who had claimed Burma, and the Burmese who held a deep resentment of the British occupation. Three messages, or three themes, from Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” are prejudice, cultural divide, and power.
The essay “Shooting an Elephant,” was written by George Orwell. Orwell was a British author best known for his essays and novels. In “Shooting an Elephant,” the title essay of his 1950 collection, Orwell is a British Police Officer in Lower Burma. After an elephant comes rampaging through the village in must, killing an Indian man, Orwell is looked upon to take care of the problem. The intense scene causes Orwell to make a crucial decision, reflecting on the vicious imperialism with the military in Burma during this time. The author portrays his feelings through the theme of the narrative with feelings such as, guilt, hate, and pressured.
In his early twenties, George Orwell (1946) began a line of work he would later term “an unsuitable profession”: officer of the Indian Imperial Police in Burma, which began his transformation into a writer of primarily political topics. His essay “Shooting an Elephant” describes his feelings of frustration in attempting to perform his duty – shooting a mad elephant discovered to have broken its chain, destroyed property, and killed a man – while avoiding the ridicule of the local population. (Orwell, 1936) The elephant can be seen to represent a number of individuals and groups in the story, held by various chains in their different circumstances.
A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.
In the essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, George Orwell retells his experiences and feelings of being disrespected as a sub-divisional police officer in Moulmein, Burma. Early one morning, In the lower part of Burma, an elephant was reported ravaging the bazaar. As Orwell’s curiosity persuades him to go investigate the elephant, the author sees the damage that the elephant left behind. He prepares out of fear to “murder” the elephant with an elephant rifle. In doing this he excited the Burmese, who led a crowd behind Orwell, encouraging him to shoot the elephant who was now no more harmless than a cow. Orwell’s diction and actions, shows a complex tone towards the natives through his loyalties, his use of racist slurs, and his struggle with power and control.
George Orwell dramatically writes about his time in Burma as an Imperial Officer in his essay “Shooting an Elephant”. He communicates in detail how he disagrees with the concept of imperialism but likewise dislikes the taunting Burmese community. Orwell goes on to recount the time an elephant rampages the village and how enlightening of an experience it was. Symbolism is a heavy orchestrator in this essay, with Orwell relating the concept of imperialism to several events such as the elephant’s rampage, the dead coolie, and the actual shooting of the elephant.
In the essay, Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell illustrates his experiences as a British police officer in Lower Burma, and reflects it to the nature of imperialism. Since “anti-European feeling was very bitter” due to the British Empire’s dictatorship in Burma, Orwell is being treated disrespectfully by the Burmese (12). This allows him to hate his job and the British Empire. However, the incident of shooting of an elephant gives him a “better glimpse … of the real nature of imperialism – the real motives for which despotic government act” (13). Through his life experiences as a British man, Orwell efficiently demonstrates the negative effects of imperialism on individuals and society.
In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell has conflicting problems concerning his position when it comes to shooting the elephant. Where Orwell was stationed at, in Burmese, he found himself being treated horribly by the Burmans because they didn’t welcome the British officers in their territory. One day, an elephant is in must and stomps around a village and terrorizes the villagers. Orwell has no ch...
In this story ,Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives presenting imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals. He is using the elephant as a symbol of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. He uses a large and very powerful animal to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.. In doing so he leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. Orwell?s moral values are challenged in many different ways, ironically enough while he too was the oppressor. He is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If he lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the...
I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool." So ends George Orwell's poignant reminiscence of an incident representing the imperialist British in Burma. Unlike Soyinka, who wrote about colonialism from the African's point of view, Orwell, like Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness, presents the moral dilemmas of the imperialist. Orwell served with the Imperialist Police in Burma while it was still part of the British Commonwealth and Empire. His service from 1922 to 1927 burdened himwith a sense of guilt about British colonialism as well a need to make some personal expiation for it (Norton 2259). "Shooting an Elephant" chronicles an incident in which Orwell confronts a moral dilemma and abandons his morals to escape the mockery of the native Burmans. He repeatedly shoots and kills an elephant which had ravaged a bazaar and scared many Burmans even though "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him" (6).
The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.
"Shooting an Elephant" is perhaps one of the most anthologized essays in the English language. It is a splendid essay and a terrific model for a theme of narration. The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. People do crazy and sometimes illegal moves to get a certain group or person to finally give them respect. George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country to the white man's reputation. The author's purpose is to explain the audience (who is both English and Burmese) about the kind of life he is living in Burma, about the conditions, circumstances he is facing and to tell the British Empire what he think about their imperialism and his growing displeasure for the imperial domination of British Empire.