Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A heros journey stage 3
Role of literature in personality development
A heros journey stage 3
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In most mythologies, the hero of the story must journey along a path that will lead them to becoming the person they are destined for. This hero or archetype is called to take this path because of some conflict that arises in which the hero must overcome; this journey will eventually end in the hero gaining something they did not have before. In Shakespearean tragedy the hero’s character leads to their own downfall. A fatal error in judgement on their part leads to disruption in the existing world and the hero’s fortune. Although, once the hero makes recognition of his mistakes order is restored and the hero receives a just punishment. King Lear and the Fisher King are similar characters who have a desire for power and riches, thus, because …show more content…
of their personality and desires they are forced to take the path of the hero.
The hero’s journey begins with their fall and separation from the familiar world. This then initiates both Kings into physical, mental, and spiritual trials of suffering as they search for enlightenment, which results in their transformation. They make recognition of their mistakes and overcome challenges and return to their ordinary world, spiritually reborn as a hero with self-knowledge, free of inner conflict. It is revealed that through the similar journey of King Lear and the Fisher King from a proud to humble identity, they are provided insight into what will truly satisfy them: compassion and love.
Both King Lear and the Fisher King are separated from a world of power and riches but also from the compassion of loved ones, when they blindly strive for what they think will satisfy them. Motivated by blind pride and vanity, King Lear divides
…show more content…
his kingdom based on the flattery of his daughters, and as a result the daughter that loves him the most is disowned for not being able to express her love to her father through the use of words. When Lear says, “The bow is bent and drawn, make from the shaft” (1.1.145), he exemplifies his arrogance and poor judgement as he does not realize the mistake he is making by determining true love using flattery. Likewise, he banishes his most loyal servant, Kent, for trying to help him “see better...” (1.1.160). Only in time will Lear realize what “...what plighted cunning hides” (1.1.282), and what mistake he has made. Similarly the Fisher King, as a boy, isolates himself from the world and sleeps alone in the forest to prove he is worthy of being a King. Though he proves himself worthy it is because of his “blindness for greater visions of power and glory” (Fisher King), that he eventually loses faith in men and himself. He is unable to love or be loved and is sick with experience. Both King Lear and the Fisher King are separated from the familiar world through blindly seeking for what they think will satisfy them, but instead are the ones responsible for their own fall, setting the Wheel of Fortune in motion. Although, it is necessary for the Kings to be separated from the familiar world, because it is through their separation from power, riches, and loved ones, they will realize that what they hunger for will not satisfy them. Secondly, each King is initiated into trials of physical, mental, and spiritual suffering because of their foolish mistakes and their search for power and riches. Lear blindly gives away too much power to his daughters and must now physically suffer from the absence of authority – with only his knights too show for. Yet that too will be taken away from his greedy daughters. He is reminded by the Fool of his mistakes but King Lear is still too proud to admit them and as a result of his actions, “[He] shall go mad!” (2.4.286). Similarly, the Fisher King, as a boy, is visited by a sacred vision saying “he shall be the keeper of the Holy Grail so it may heal the hearts of men” (Fisher King), but being blinded by greater visions he reaches for the grail and burns his hand. The King eventually loses faith in men and himself, and is unable to love or be loved, but most of all he spiritually suffers from loneliness. The Fisher King and Lear must suffer physically, mentally, and spiritually for their blind behaviours in order for them to acquire enlightenment towards self-knowledge or rebirth. Suffering is necessary for the Kings to experience when going through a transformation because through suffering they are able to learn the cause of their suffering and what mistakes were made. It teaches them what they need to do to change their current situation and to not go down that path again. Thirdly, both King Lear and the Fisher King overcome their challenges through experience and insight from internal suffering and the external influence of others, which then allows them to transform into the person they are destined to be. King Lear enters a storm in a state of madness with the belief that the cause for his madness is the ingratitude of his daughters. Lear starts showing some compassion and empathy, especially towards the fool when he calls him “my boy” (2.4.check line). Later, he encounters Edgar, as a beggar, who only heightens his madness bringing him recognition of his own folly. Lear shows empathy towards the beggars and realizes he has “ta’en/ Too little care of [them]” (3.4.32-33). Lear understands that humans are “no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal” (3.4.105) and that power and riches are just a sophisticated image. He begins to realize what he has done to Cordelia and recognizes that he is not an invincible King, but rather an ordinary human being. In the same manner, the Fisher King encounters a Fool who helps him make recognition of his mistakes and what he really needs. The Fool doesn’t see a King like everybody else, but rather “a man alone and in pain” (Fisher King). Without hesitation, the Fool gives the King a glass of water when he is thirsty. Though, it appears, that his physical wound is being healed, the real wound that is healed is his spiritual and mental wounds, from being alone. The King finally finds the Holy Grail he is looking for, and it was not through gaining power but through understanding what it means to be compassionate, humble, and loved. The Fisher King and Lear finally gain insight and realize their mistakes, but had to suffer for it in order to make recognition and change their identity. Thorough overcoming challenges they realize what is truly important – compassion, humility, and love. The transformation of these two Kings has helped them evolve into the true hero’s they are destined to be. They are now capable of loving those that love them and humble themselves with those below them in the hierarchy. Lastly, both King Lear and the Fisher King are spiritually reborn with self-knowledge and freedom of inner conflict through recognition, compassion and the love of others.
King Lear is free from inner agony and conflict once he reconciles with Cordelia and is forgiven. He is now spiritually a new person who has acquired humility and compassion after accepting responsibility for his actions. He is no longer the proud and blind King he was before but rather sees himself as “a very foolish fond man... [and] mainly ignorant” (4.7.60-65). Though his mistakes have resulted in the death of his most loving daughter and his suffering resulted in his own death, he dies in a state of joy and in good faith. Similarly, the Fisher King is symbolically healed from his spiritual and mental wound of loneliness. He realizes that what he was really longing for is the compassion and love from someone else to heal his loneliness and free him of inner agony. That someone was not the “brightest and bravest” (Fisher King), but a fool that “only knew [he was] thirsty” (Fisher King). Both King Lear and the Fisher King were able to recognize their mistakes and gain enlightenment of what is really important and what will truly satisfy them. It is through this spiritual rebirth that they are free of agony and inner conflict. The Kings are now able to give and receive love and compassion; they have humbled themselves and no longer have the same prideful ego. Now that the hero’s have overcome their
challenges and made recognition of their mistakes they must return to the ones that loved and showed compassion to them, and reconcile with them. Moral order is restored and the Wheel of Fortune is back to normal. To conclude, it is revealed that, through the similar journeys of King Lear and the Fisher King from a proud to humble identity, we are provided insight into what will truly satisfy us: compassion and love. Both King Lear and the Fisher King demonstrate that we should never let the pleasures of power and riches interfere with our ability to be humble and compassionate, and to recognize genuine love. If we let these materialistic obsessions change who we are then we risk the consequences of loneliness, emptiness, and mental suffering. We can never be satisfied with power and riches because they provide no contentment, only the need for wanting more. Love and compassion, however, is an eternal gratification. It is what keeps people together and happy, whether you are a King or fool(beggar).
A journey often sparks an individual’s self-realisation. In King Lear, when Edmund is close to death, he is finally aware of his despicable nature and attempts to redeem himself by revealing Cordelia and Lear’s location. When Edmund states “I pant for life. Some good I mean to do, Despite of
It tainted his familial bonds and gave him a sense of determination to escape society’s value of him. The notion of bastardy drives this aspect of the plot and is the single most important idea when looking into the phenomenon of cruelty between Edmund and Gloucester in King Lear. Edmund’s story is tragic because there is no resolution for his biggest grievance apart from a larger paradigm shift, marking a change in society’s value of the bastard. It is safe to say that Edmund and Gloucester’s relationship was plagued by powers greater than themselves. Shakespeare elevates their relationship to start a dialogue about family and societal values—creating a deeply layered and tragic
In The Tragedy of King Lear, particularly in the first half of the play, Lear continually swears to the gods. He invokes them for mercies and begs them for destruction; he binds both his oaths and his curses with their names. The older characters—Lear and Gloucester—tend view their world as strictly within the moral framework of the pagan religion. As Lear expresses it, the central core of his religion lies in the idea of earthly justice. In II.4.14-15, Lear expresses his disbelief that Regan and Albany would have put the disguised Kent, his messenger, in stocks. He at first attempts to deny the rather obvious fact in front of him, objecting “No” twice before swearing it. By the time Lear invokes the king of the pagan gods, his refusal to believe has become willful and almost absurd. Kent replies, not without sarcasm, by affixing the name of the queen of the gods to a contradictory statement. The formula is turned into nonsense by its repetition. In contradicting Lear’s oath as well as the assertion with which it is coupled, Kent is subtly challenging Lear’s conception of the universe as controlled by just gods. He is also and perhaps more importantly, challenging Lear’s relationship with the gods. It is Kent who most lucidly and repeatedly opposes the ideas put forth by Lear; his actions as well as his statements undermine Lear’s hypotheses about divine order. Lear does not find his foil in youth but in middle age; not in the opposite excess of his own—Edmund’s calculation, say—but in Kent’s comparative moderation. Likewise the viable alternative to his relationship to divine justice is not shown by Edmund with his ...
The possession of a higher power and authority is the foundation of an individual’s excessive pride, which ultimately restricts their rationality and leads to their downfall. In fact, through studying Lear in the love scene, Shakespeare has indefinitely characterised Lear as a hubristic monarch due to his initial power and authority, conveyed through the sennet and majestic plural used in Lear’s entrance and dialogue respectively. For example, Lear’s decision to ‘[divide] in three [his] kingdom’ so that ‘future strife may
It goes without saying that we all react to the experiences that we have. What differs from person to person is how those experiences affect our being and what each of us takes from those experiences and how we apply it to our lives from that point on. We see this happening not only in our own lives, but also in literature. The characters from Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth and those from Milton’s Paradise Lost show, through their conflicts, that the experiences that they are exposed to affect their lives in a negative way. In all three of these pieces of literature, the reactions the characters have to their experiences are what bring about their ultimate demise. Unfortunately, these characters don’t realize the error of their actions until it’s too late, but we, as the audience, can learn from the mistakes we see the characters make in Hamlet, Macbeth and Paradise Lost.
In William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear’, there are several issues that answer the questions about our duty to our fathers and our kings, as well as, whether there are ever circumstances when we should disobey them in order to do our duty to them. Our duty to our fathers and our kings is not only to love and obey them, show them respect and honor them, but it is also to humble them, keep them honest when necessary, keep them safe and protect them. You cannot have the praise without the discipline of being a good father or a good king. To be praised and worshiped as many kings and sometimes fathers are by their children, can breed a sense of entitlement that can be damaging to their character.
King Lear is a Shakespearian tragedy revolving largely around one central theme, personal transformation. Shakespeare shows in King Lear that the main characters of the play experience a transformative phase, where they are greatly changed through their suffering. Through the course of the play Lear is the most transformed of all the characters. He goes through seven major stages of transformation on his way to becoming an omniscient character: resentment, regret, recognition, acceptance and admittance, guilt, redemption, and optimism. Shakespeare identifies King Lear as a contemptuous human being who is purified through his suffering into some sort of god.
No tragedy of Shakespeare moves us more deeply that we can hardly look upon the bitter ending than King Lear. Though, in reality, Lear is far from like us. He himself is not an everyday man but a powerful king. Could it be that recognize in Lear the matter of dying? Each of us is, in some sense, a king who must eventually give up his kingdom. To illustrate the process of dying, Shakespeare has given Lear a picture of old age in great detail. Lear’s habit to slip out of a conversation (Shakespeare I. v. 19-33), his brash banishment of his most beloved and honest daughter, and his bitter resentment towards his own loss of function and control, highlighted as he ironically curses Goneril specifically on her functions of youth and prays that her
One of the most popular characters in Shakespearean literature, Hamlet endures difficult situations within the castle he lives in. The fatal death of his father, and urge for revenge leads Hamlet into making unreasonable decisions. In William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s sanity diminishes as the story progresses, impacting the people around him as well as the timing and outcome of his revenge against Claudius.
Shakespeare’s plays Hamlet and King Lear share many similarities. One prevalent similarity is the theme of betrayal and revenge and how betrayal leads to karmic justice through revenge. Both plays are well known Shakespearean tragedies revolving around the affairs of noble families(wracked with greed) in charge of powerful kingdoms. The plays both possess main characters who betray their family for personal gain, an upsetting of the natural order due to betrayals, and revenge for committed betrayals.
Perhaps Lear's most difficult moment to endure is when he discovers his youngest and most prized daughter, Cordelia, dead. His initial reaction is of unbearable pain, but, being in his current state of madness, some of the anguish is alleviated when he "realizes" that she is alive. The king overcomes his earlier mistakes only after losing the one daughter who truly loved him. It's debatable whether Lear is completely conscious of his loss, but more plausible to suspect he is not fully affected by it as he is no longer in his right mind. Finally, Lear has dealt with the consequences of his decisions and is redeemed.
King Lear is a play about a tragic hero, by the name of King Lear, whose flaws get the best of him. A tragic hero must possess three qualities. The first is they must have power, in other words, a leader. King Lear has the highest rank of any leader. He is a king. The next quality is they must have a tragic flaw, and King Lear has several of those. Finally, they must experience a downfall. Lear's realization of his mistakes is more than a downfall. It is a tragedy. Lear is a tragic hero because he has those three qualities. His flaws are his arrogance, his ignorance, and his misjudgments, each contributing to the other.
...breathing but it is his abundant amount of grief that kills him. Lear weeps “Pray you undo this button” Act V, sc. iii, ll. 309 allowing the audience to observe a final change in Lear, when he comes to recognize that he is only human.
Like all Shakespearean tragedies, Hamlet’s ending is no different in end-result. Hamlet’s separation from society and his self-imposed confusion caused by over-thinking results in the unnecessary deaths of most of the major characters. In turn, Hamlet’s pre-occupation with factors inessential to his mission of revenge slows down his action. It is this internal struggle that illustrates the intensity and complexity of Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, something that is often looked at from a psychological perspective.
King Lear is a tragic story by William Shakespeare is a story of a man King Lear and his decision that led to his fate and the fate of others. With every tragic story comes a tragic hero. The tragic hero of the story is King Lear. According to the definition of a tragic hero one must be born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw, doomed to make a serious error in judgement, fall from great heights or high esteem, realize they have made an irreversible mistake, and faces and accepts death with honor meets a tragic death. King Lear meets all of these qualities.