The Great Cat Massacre Summary

488 Words1 Page

The author Robert Darnton argues in his article “The Great Cat Massacre” the harsh conditions of the daily life of an apprentices. More specifically, Darnton uses statistics and sources to establish his credibility, by mentioning various stories to appeal and persuade to his audience. For example, Darnton commences by intriguing his audience by the statement “The funniest thing that ever happened…”. He successfully makes the reader question what he will say. The author approaches with unimaginable statements keeping the reader intrigued from start to finish. Darnton then uses valid sources by stating the testimony of Nicolas Contat in the shop rue Saint-Severin. Nicolas Contat proceeds by explaining first-hand the life of an apprentice was tough and vulgarized. Moreover, the demise of the cats is already a questionable issue itself. Especially, how the bourgeoisie put cats in a pedestal. …show more content…

For example, Darnton writes “They slept in a filthy freezing room, rose before dawn, ran errands all day while dodging insults…” This questions the morality and structure of Paris in the late 1730’s. To conclude, Darnton successfully gets his argument across and explains the atrocious structure of the 1730’s, by using sources to appeal and persuade the audience. Barbara A. Hanawalt in her work “Childrearing Among the Lower Classes of Late Medieval England” argues the rearing of children after the age of 7. Furthermore, Hanawalt explains the circumstances in society that leads for the system to be atrocious. Those of nobility in urban settings are less common to meet the same experience than ordinary people such as; calamities or homicides. Additionally, those in power are except from a wide spectrum of judicial process and coroners request. Consequently, the nobility will never experience the harshness of the lower class or want modification of the

Open Document