Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis on the giver
Symbolism essay the giver
Literary analysis on the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Universal Paradox stated, “You are free to make your choices but you are not free to choose the consequences.” Any choice you make no matter how big or small always comes with consequences. The theme of choice is exemplified in The Giver, No Ordinary Joe, and The Road Not Taken through the difficult decisions they had to make.
Jonas, from The Giver by Lois Lowry, makes choices that let the reader know what kind of person he really is. Jonas lives in a community that revolves around Sameness. Nobody makes any decisions for themselves and they all follow the rules of the community. However once Jonas realizes that he can choose his own legacy he takes it into his own hands. Jonas states, “If everything's the same then there aren't any choices!
…show more content…
I want to wake up in the morning and decide things!” Jonas finally realizes that he could have a say in how his life is lived.
Even if it's as small as choosing what color shirt to wear, he wanted the ability to choose. The community feared that if people were able to make choices, Sameness and control would be lost. They feared the idea of people's choices impacting others and disturbing the peace. The community made a very precise choice when they chose Jonas to be The Giver. However would they have chosen him if they knew his choices would impact the community? The choices Jonas made reflected the kind of person and citizen he was in the community.
In the story “No Ordinary Joe” by Rick Reilly the choices one made made impacted his whole future. One hot afternoon Joe Delaney, AFC’s best young running back, made the right decision that ended in the wrong way. While basking in the sun he heard shrieks of help. Being the kind of person Joe was he made the right decision to get up and help. He realized that three boys were drowned and he immediately jumped in to save them. However there was only
…show more content…
one problem….He couldn't swim himself. That day Joe delaney drowned alongside two of the boys, however he managed to save one. People wonder why he jumped in? Why did he think he could save them if he couldn't even save himself? The No Ordinary Joe article states, “After all, there were hundreds of people at the park, and not another soul dived into that pit. Nobody but Delaney, one guy who shouldn't have.” Joe Delaney was known as a selfless and generous guy who never let the fame of being a pro football player get to his head. Joe Delaney had no hesitations when it came to making the choice to jump into the pit. Being the guy he was the only thing that probably went through his head was someone's life is on the line and I am going to do anything in my power to save them. However he was not thinking about his own life on the line or the impact his choices would make on himself. However the choices Joe Delaney made on that day saved the life of LeMarkits Holland. In the following years LeMarkits went down a bad path of life. He got involved in drugs and was thrown in jail for his bad decisions. You would think that he would treasure the gift Joe Delaney gave him and be a better person. However his choices were his own and it's not Joe Delaney's fault Lemarkits made bad decisions. Although Joe Delaney had to pay a big price for his decision, he would be happy with the impact he made on the world. The theme of choice is very common in the story “The Lottery” .
J.K. Rowling said, "It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." This quote pertains very closely to Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery." In "The Lottery" Tessie Hutchinson chooses the black dot out of the black box during the annual Lottery. This meant she would be stoned. The black box represents people choosing their own destiny and future. Tessie Hutchinson chose her own future, but it wasn't the future she was hoping for. She claimed that her husband did not have enough time to pick but the town argues that everyone took the same chances. Tessies choices in the past impacted the lives of her children. In the past lottery's Tessie threw rocks at the other “chosen ones.” Once it was her turn, her children just followed in her footsteps and stoned her like she was any other person. Even though her son thought about throwing a stone he eventually gave in and contributed in stoning his mother. Also Mrs. Delacroix chose a rock that was so large she needed both hands to carry it. Mrs. Delacroix either chose the biggest rock because she was following in the cruel tradition of the lottery, or she wanted the death of her friend to end quickly. It all depends if you look at the human or inhuman side of the story. Either way Mrs. Delacroix made the choice to join in on this cruel event just like Tessie's son. The choices these characters made in this story are a reflection of the kind of
people they are. Throughout the stories of The Giver, No Ordinary Joe, and The Road Not Taken the theme of choice is manifested. The choices people make set up the path of life they are going to take. Choices are made everyday and without them we would all fall into a place of Sameness like in The Giver. In the end it all comes down to what kind of person your choices make you. Will you accept your decisions, or will you wonder about the path not taken?
What are memories to you? In the book The Giver, by Lois Lowry. There is a boy his name is Jonas. He is the Receiver of Memories. Jonas experiences the memories over the course of the book. Memories help us understand there are consequences to your actions. Although some readers may believe that memories are not important. The memories Jonas had helped him with the journey at the end of the book.
Without the ability of choice in Jonas’s society there is no ability to improve of change. For example the ceremonies “I remember how proud my parents were” exclaimed father telling Jonas how he had participated in a ceremony and his parents before him. This is true because no one has differed from the set path life in the community. Also without choice there is no ability for improvement. Humans learn from mistakes and without choices there would be no mistakes therefore making it impossible to improve anything.
The first reason why the community in the book The Giver should be given personal rights is because the inhabitants of the community could learn from their mistakes. Without any personal rights they cannot make their own decisions; if they don’t make their own decisions they cannot learn from their mistakes that their decisions had led them to. On page 98 in The Giver Jonas stated that “What if they were allowed to choose their own mate? And chose wrong?” This tells the reader...
The essential thing to overcoming adversity is the ability to cause change in yourself and others. In the book, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, Jonas is singled out after he isn’t chosen during the Ceremony of Twelve. He has to learn to overcome the pain of being The Receiver of Memory. He also has to face the truth and discover who his real allies are. This helps him to become a changemaker because he grows. He grows by using the pain to become stronger mentally and physically. Ultimately, Lowry teaches us that to make a change, you must display curiosity and determination.
“The Giver shrugged. “Our people made that choice, the choice to sameness”. This quote supports my thesis because what the Giver meant by “Our people” was the committee of elders and how they chose sameness. If the committee of elders chose that then the people in Jonas’ community didn't have a choice, they don't even know. This also proves that people choose wrong when they have
“How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made.” (Lowry, 48) In Lowry’s novel, The Giver, eliminating choices and feelings caused their society to be worse than our society today because you don’t have any choices and you don’t get to experience the feeling of joy and happiness.
Lois Lowry describes a futuristic world with controlled climate, emotions, way of living and eliminates suffering in her book The Giver. The main character, Jonas, shows the reader what his world is like by explaining a very different world from what society knows today. Everything is controlled, and no one makes choices for themselves or knows of bad and hurtful memories. There is no color, and everything is dull. As he becomes the Receiver who has to know all the memories and pass them down to the next Receiver, he realizes his world needs change. He starts to believe that a world of sameness where no one can decide or make choices for themselves is boring. Lois Lowry is warning readers that living in a world of sameness is not something to create as it is boring and dull, but if the world follows conformity and does not value diversity and difference enough, society could become that of Jonas’s.
As Jonas receives these memories, he ponders how their community would be different if they could make more choices. For example, after the Giver transmits Jonas a memory of family, Jonas thinks how crazy it is that they have generations and he says about his community, “‘What if they were allowed to choose their own mate?’”...”’Or what if’”...”’they could choose their own jobs?’” (124). Jonas then thinks if people should make these choices, and things that could go wrong if they did. For instance, while he is thinking about how crazy these choices are, he says, “‘I can’t even imagine it. We really have to protect people from wrong choices’”(124). People in his Community don’t choose their own spouse, the Community leaders assign them a spouse and children if they want. Jonas’s Community is brain-washed into not having opinions or choices. Although they have no divorce and wrong choices, Jonas would rather have choices and a real
The Giver: Analysis of Jonas On the surface, Jonas is like any other eleven-year-old boy living in his community. He seems more intelligent and perceptive than many of his peers, and he thinks more seriously than they do about life, worrying about his own future as well as his friend Asher’s. He enjoys learning and experiencing new things: he chooses to volunteer at a variety of different centers rather than focusing on one, because he enjoys the freedom of choice that volunteer hours provide. He also enjoys learning about and connecting with other people, and he craves more warmth and human contact than his society permits or encourages. The things that really set him apart from his peers—his unusual eyes, his ability to see things change in a way that he cannot explain—trouble him, but he does not let them bother him too much, since the community’s emphasis on politeness makes it easy for Jonas to conceal or ignore these little differences.
Jonas is the protagonist in The Giver. He changes from being a typical twelve-year-old boy to being a boy with the knowledge and wisdom of generations past. He has emotions that he has no idea how to handle. At first he wants to share his changes with his family by transmitting memories to them, but he soon realizes this will not work. After he feels pain and love, Jonas decides that the whole community needs to understand these memories. Therefore Jonas leaves the community and his memories behind for them to deal with. He hopes to change the society so that they may feel love and happiness, and also see color. Jonas knows that memories are hard to deal with but without memories there is no pain and with no pain, there is no true happiness.
Dystopian literature brings warning to the modern world and allows the audience to experience a new perception of life. The 1993 novel, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, fits into the dystopian genre because it makes judgment about modern society. She inscribed her novel “For all the children to whom we entrust the future”, which serves as a hope for a better future (Franklin). She targets the younger generation because they are the future. In Lowry’s novel, The Giver, Lowry’s perspective on modern society is that it tends to stay within its comfort zone, which creates limitations in life. The dystopian characteristics of the novel, importance of memory, the history surrounding the novel, and Lowry’s personal background all convey the notion that modern society should freedom bestowed it and to fully appreciate life in itself; society tends to take life’s freedoms for granted.
“The Giver” a novel by Lois Lowry (1993), is an, engaging science fiction tale that provides the reader with examples of thought provoking ethical and moral quandaries. It is a novel geared to the young teenage reader but also kept me riveted. Assigning this novel as a class assignment would provide many opportunities for teachers and students to discuss values and morals.
In the novel, The Giver by Lois Lowry, the author makes it clear through the main character Jonas that freedom and safety need to find an equal balance. Lowry shows the importance of deep emotions and family through Jonas. Jonas becomes the new receiver of memory and learns about the past. He also learned about the way it was when people knew what love was. Jonas’ father releases newborn children because they don’t weight the correct amount of weight or they don’t sleep well through the night. Release is a nice way of saying kill; the people of the community don’t know what kill means. They don’t have the freedom to expand their vocabulary. Lois Lowry makes it clear that safety has a negative side and you need that you need freedom to have a high functioning community.
Jonas always tells his dreams. He always was there for chastisement. He always shared his feelings at the evening meal. He also always took his pill every morning. “Now he swallowed the pill his mother handed him.”(Page 38). By the end of the book Jonas is rebellious. He stops taking pills for emotions that he is supposed to take everyday. Jonas stays at the Giver’s house when he sees his father kill a baby. Jonas also tries to escape from the community when Giver creates a plan to escape from the community which Jonas barely follows because of Gabe’s release. “But your role now is to escape.” (Page 162). This means that Jonas has to escape and the Giver must stay to help the community after he is gone.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”